• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Manual response inhibition and quality of life in adults who stutter.口吃成人的手动反应抑制与生活质量。
J Commun Disord. 2020 Nov-Dec;88:106053. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2020.106053. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
2
Verbal Response Inhibition in Adults Who Stutter.口吃成人的言语反应抑制。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Sep 14;64(9):3382-3397. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00739. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
3
Temperament in Adults Who Stutter and Its Association With Stuttering Frequency and Quality-of-Life Impacts.口吃成年人的气质及其与口吃频率和生活质量影响的关联。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Aug 15;62(8):2691-2702. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-S-18-0225. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
4
Exogenous verbal response inhibition in adults who do and do not stutter.有口吃和无口吃成年人的外源性言语反应抑制
J Fluency Disord. 2023 Mar;75:105957. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2022.105957. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
5
Validation and evaluation of the Dutch translation of the Overall Assessment of the Speaker's Experience of Stuttering for School-age children (OASES-S-D).学龄儿童口吃者总体体验评估(OASES-S-D)荷兰语翻译版的验证与评估。
J Fluency Disord. 2015 Sep;45:27-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2015.05.003. Epub 2015 May 31.
6
Psychometric evaluation of the Dutch translation of the Overall Assessment of the Speaker's Experience of Stuttering for adults (OASES-A-D).成人口吃体验总体评估量表(OASES-A-D)荷兰语翻译版的心理测量学评估。
J Fluency Disord. 2011 Sep;36(3):222-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2011.03.002. Epub 2011 Apr 5.
7
Relative contributions to overall impact of stuttering in adults using the overall assessment of the Speaker's Experience of Stuttering (OASES).使用演讲者口吃体验整体评估量表(OASES)评估成年人口吃的总体影响的相对贡献。
J Fluency Disord. 2020 Sep;65:105775. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2020.105775. Epub 2020 Jun 13.
8
Communication attitude of Kannada-speaking adults who do and do not stutter.有口吃和无口吃的卡纳达语成年者的沟通态度。
J Fluency Disord. 2021 Dec;70:105866. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2021.105866. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
9
The experience of Polish individuals who stutter based on the OASES outcomes.波兰口吃者基于 OASES 结果的体验。
J Fluency Disord. 2023 Sep;77:105991. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2023.105991. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
10
Sleep Problems, Social Anxiety and Stuttering Severity in Adults Who Do and Adults Who Do Not Stutter.有口吃和无口吃成年人的睡眠问题、社交焦虑及口吃严重程度
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 25;12(1):161. doi: 10.3390/jcm12010161.

引用本文的文献

1
An fMRI study of initiation and inhibition of manual and spoken responses in people who stutter.一项关于口吃者手动和言语反应启动与抑制的功能磁共振成像研究。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2025 Jul 31;3. doi: 10.1162/IMAG.a.89. eCollection 2025.
2
White matter tract strength correlates with therapy outcome in persistent developmental stuttering.脑白质束强度与持续性发展性口吃的治疗效果相关。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2022 Aug 1;43(11):3357-3374. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25853. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
3
Adults Who Stutter Show Diminished Word Fluency, Regardless of Mode.口吃成年人无论采用何种模式,言语流畅性均降低。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Mar 8;65(3):906-922. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00344. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
4
Complex nonverbal response inhibition and stopping impulsivity in childhood stuttering.儿童口吃中复杂的非言语反应抑制和停止冲动。
J Fluency Disord. 2021 Dec;70:105877. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2021.105877. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
5
Verbal Response Inhibition in Adults Who Stutter.口吃成人的言语反应抑制。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Sep 14;64(9):3382-3397. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00739. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
6
Towards real-world generalizability of a circuit for action-stopping.迈向行动停止电路在真实世界中的泛化能力。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2021 Sep;22(9):538-552. doi: 10.1038/s41583-021-00485-1. Epub 2021 Jul 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Repetitive Negative Thinking, Temperament, and Adverse Impact in Adults Who Stutter.重复性消极思维、气质与口吃成人的不良影响。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020 Feb 7;29(1):201-215. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-19-00077. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
2
A Phenomenological Analysis of the Experience of Stuttering.口吃体验的现象学分析。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 Oct 19;27(3S):1180-1194. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-ODC11-17-0192.
3
Short-Term Memory, Inhibition, and Attention in Developmental Stuttering: A Meta-Analysis.发展性口吃中短期记忆、抑制和注意力的元分析。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 Jul 13;61(7):1626-1648. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-S-17-0372.
4
Exogenously triggered response inhibition in developmental stuttering.发育性口吃中由外部触发的反应抑制
J Fluency Disord. 2018 Jun;56:33-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2018.02.001. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
5
Executive function and childhood stuttering: Parent ratings and evidence from a behavioral task.执行功能与儿童口吃:父母评分及一项行为任务的证据
J Fluency Disord. 2018 Jun;56:18-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2017.12.001. Epub 2017 Dec 30.
6
Structural connectivity of right frontal hyperactive areas scales with stuttering severity.右侧额区过度活跃的结构连接与口吃严重程度相关。
Brain. 2018 Jan 1;141(1):191-204. doi: 10.1093/brain/awx316.
7
Do all inhibitions act alike? A study of go/no-go and stop-signal paradigms.所有抑制作用的表现都相同吗?一项关于“执行/不执行”和停止信号范式的研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 24;12(10):e0186774. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186774. eCollection 2017.
8
Should we stop thinking about inhibition? Searching for individual and age differences in inhibition ability.我们是否应该停止思考抑制作用?探寻抑制能力的个体差异和年龄差异。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Apr;44(4):501-526. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000450. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
9
Explicit and Implicit Verbal Response Inhibition in Preschool-Age Children Who Stutter.口吃学龄前儿童的显性和隐性言语反应抑制
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Apr 14;60(4):836-852. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-16-0135.
10
Children who stutter show reduced action-related activity in the rostral cingulate zone.口吃的儿童在喙部扣带区表现出与动作相关的活动减少。
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Feb;96:213-221. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.01.022. Epub 2017 Jan 21.

口吃成人的手动反应抑制与生活质量。

Manual response inhibition and quality of life in adults who stutter.

机构信息

Louisiana State University, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, 68 Hatcher Hall, Field House Drive, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, United States.

Louisiana State University, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, 68 Hatcher Hall, Field House Drive, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, United States.

出版信息

J Commun Disord. 2020 Nov-Dec;88:106053. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2020.106053. Epub 2020 Sep 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2020.106053
PMID:33065458
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7736488/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A considerable amount of research has identified inhibition differences, including slower inhibition of manual responses, in people who stutter. Recent investigations have failed to link slowed motor inhibition with overt stuttering severity. This study investigated the potential relationship between slowed manual response inhibition and the negative impact of stuttering upon individual lives of adults who stutter (AWS).

METHODS

Thirty-four adults (AWS, n = 17; AWNS, n = 17) matched by nonverbal IQ completed a manual stop-signal task and provided a conversational speech sample. Motor inhibition latency for AWS and AWNS were compared. For AWS, motor inhibition latency was compared to the four subsections of the Overall Assessment of the Speaker's Experience with Stuttering (OASES; Yaruss & Quesal, 2006; General Information, Reactions to Stuttering, Communication in Daily Situations, Quality of Life).

RESULTS

Similar to previous studies, AWS were significantly slower to inhibit inaccurate manual responses than AWNS. Quality of Life subtest of the OASES was found to significantly predict inhibition latency.

CONCLUSION

These data replicate findings that indicate that AWS exhibit slower manual inhibition latency, and suggest that these inhibition differences may be associated with an individual's negative experience with stuttering rather than stuttering severity.

摘要

背景

大量研究已经确定了抑制差异,包括口吃者手动反应的抑制速度较慢。最近的调查未能将运动抑制速度较慢与明显的口吃严重程度联系起来。本研究调查了口吃者(AWS)的手动反应抑制速度较慢与口吃对个体生活的负面影响之间的潜在关系。

方法

34 名成年人(AWS,n = 17;AWNS,n = 17)按非言语智商匹配,完成了手动停止信号任务,并提供了会话语音样本。比较了 AWS 和 AWNS 的运动抑制潜伏期。对于 AWS,将运动抑制潜伏期与口吃者体验总评估(OASES;Yaruss & Quesal,2006;一般信息、对口吃的反应、日常生活中的沟通、生活质量)的四个部分进行了比较。

结果

与之前的研究相似,AWS 抑制不准确的手动反应明显较慢,而 AWNS 则较快。OASES 的生活质量子测试被发现显著预测抑制潜伏期。

结论

这些数据复制了表明 AWS 表现出较慢的手动抑制潜伏期的发现,并表明这些抑制差异可能与个体对口吃的负面体验有关,而不是与口吃严重程度有关。