O'Connor Kathryn L, Rowson Steven, Duma Stefan M, Broglio Steven P
NeuroTrauma Research Laboratory, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
School of Biomedical Engineering and Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg.
J Athl Train. 2017 Mar;52(3):206-227. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050.52.2.05.
With an estimated 3.8 million sport- and recreation-related concussions occurring annually, targeted prevention and diagnostic methods are needed. Biomechanical analysis of head impacts may provide quantitative information that can inform both prevention and diagnostic strategies.
To assess available head-impact devices and their clinical utility.
We performed a systematic search of the electronic database PubMed for peer-reviewed publications, using the following phrases: accelerometer and concussion, head impact telemetry, head impacts and concussion and sensor, head impacts and sensor, impact sensor and concussion, linear acceleration and concussion, rotational acceleration and concussion, and xpatch concussion. In addition to the literature review, a Google search for head impact monitor and concussion monitor yielded 15 more devices.
Included studies were performed in vivo, used commercially available devices, and focused on sport-related concussion.
One author reviewed the title and abstract of each study for inclusion and exclusion criteria and then reviewed each full-text article to confirm inclusion criteria. Controversial articles were reviewed by all authors to reach consensus.
In total, 61 peer-reviewed articles involving 4 head-impact devices were included. Participants in boxing, football, ice hockey, soccer, or snow sports ranged in age from 6 to 24 years; 18% (n = 11) of the studies included female athletes. The Head Impact Telemetry System was the most widely used device (n = 53). Fourteen additional commercially available devices were presented.
Measurements collected by impact monitors provided real-time data to estimate player exposure but did not have the requisite sensitivity to concussion. Proper interpretation of previously reported head-impact kinematics across age, sport, and position may inform future research and enable staff clinicians working on the sidelines to monitor athletes. However, head-impact-monitoring systems have limited clinical utility due to error rates, designs, and low specificity in predicting concussive injury.
据估计,每年有380万起与运动和娱乐相关的脑震荡事件发生,因此需要有针对性的预防和诊断方法。头部撞击的生物力学分析可能会提供定量信息,为预防和诊断策略提供依据。
评估现有的头部撞击设备及其临床效用。
我们使用以下短语对电子数据库PubMed进行了系统检索,以查找同行评审的出版物:加速度计与脑震荡、头部撞击遥测、头部撞击与脑震荡及传感器、头部撞击与传感器、撞击传感器与脑震荡、线性加速度与脑震荡、旋转加速度与脑震荡以及xpatch脑震荡。除了文献综述外,通过谷歌搜索头部撞击监测器和脑震荡监测器又找到了15种设备。
纳入的研究在活体中进行,使用市售设备,并专注于与运动相关的脑震荡。
一位作者审查每项研究的标题和摘要,以确定纳入和排除标准,然后审查每篇全文文章以确认纳入标准。有争议的文章由所有作者共同审查以达成共识。
总共纳入了61篇涉及4种头部撞击设备的同行评审文章。拳击、足球、冰球、足球或冰雪运动的参与者年龄在6至24岁之间;18%(n = 11)的研究纳入了女运动员。头部撞击遥测系统是使用最广泛的设备(n = 53)。另外还介绍了14种市售设备。
撞击监测器收集的测量数据提供了估计运动员暴露情况的实时数据,但对脑震荡的敏感性不足。对先前报告的不同年龄、运动和位置的头部撞击运动学进行正确解读,可能会为未来的研究提供参考,并使在场边工作的临床工作人员能够监测运动员。然而,由于错误率、设计以及预测震荡性损伤的特异性较低,头部撞击监测系统的临床效用有限。