Gabler Lee F, Patton Declan A, Reynier Kristen A, Barnett Ian J, Miles Alexander M, Dau Nathan Z, Clugston James R, Cobian Daniel G, Harmon Kimberly G, Kontos Anthony P, Lynall Robert C, Mihalik Jason P, Moran Ryan N, Terry Douglas P, Mayer Thom, Solomon Gary S, Sills Allen K, Arbogast Kristy B, Crandall Jeff R
Biomechanics Consulting & Research LLC, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Center for Injury Research and Prevention, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2025 Mar 17;11(1):e002365. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002365. eCollection 2025.
To compare the severity of head impacts between professional and Division I (D-I) collegiate football games for the purpose of improving protective equipment.
A total of 243 football players from the National Football League (NFL) and from D-I of the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) were equipped with instrumented mouthpieces capable of measuring six degrees-of-freedom head kinematics. Head impacts were processed using a custom algorithm and combined with game period descriptors to produce a curated dataset for analysis. Head impact severity distributions for several kinematic-based metrics were compared within position groupings between leagues.
A total of 11 038 head impacts greater than 10 g from 1208 player-games were collected during 286 player-seasons (2019-2022). No significant differences were found between leagues in the distributions of kinematic-based metrics for all investigated position groupings (p≥0.320). The median and IQRs for peak linear acceleration for NFL and NCAA were 17.2 (9.3) g and 17.0 (8.6) g for linemen, 20.7 (13.8) g and 20.0 (13.5) g for hybrid and 21.0 (17.0) g and 20.8 (15.5) g for speed position groupings, respectively.
The absence of statistically significant differences in the distributions of head impact severity between professional and D-I collegiate football players indicates that these data can be combined for the purpose of understanding the range of loading conditions for which new protective equipment, such as position-specific helmets, should be designed. This observation underscores the potential for knowledge transfer regarding biomechanical factors affecting head loading across professional and D-I college football, highlighting crucial implications for innovation in protective equipment.
比较职业橄榄球比赛与美国大学体育协会(NCAA)一级联赛(D-I)橄榄球比赛中头部撞击的严重程度,以改进防护装备。
共有243名来自国家橄榄球联盟(NFL)和NCAA D-I的橄榄球运动员配备了能够测量六个自由度头部运动学的仪器化口器。使用自定义算法处理头部撞击数据,并与比赛时段描述符相结合,以生成用于分析的精选数据集。在不同联盟的位置分组内比较了几种基于运动学指标的头部撞击严重程度分布。
在286个球员赛季(2019 - 2022年)期间,共收集了来自1208场球员比赛的11038次大于10g的头部撞击。在所有调查的位置分组中,基于运动学指标的分布在不同联盟之间未发现显著差异(p≥0.320)。NFL和NCAA线卫的峰值线性加速度中位数和四分位距分别为17.2(9.3)g和17.0(8.6)g,混合型球员为20.7(13.8)g和20.0(13.5)g,速度型位置分组为21.0(17.0)g和20.8(15.5)g。
职业橄榄球运动员和NCAA D-I橄榄球运动员之间头部撞击严重程度分布没有统计学上的显著差异,这表明这些数据可以合并起来,用于了解新防护装备(如特定位置头盔)应设计应对的负荷条件范围。这一观察结果强调了在职业橄榄球和NCAA D-I大学橄榄球之间就影响头部负荷的生物力学因素进行知识转移的潜力,突出了防护装备创新的关键意义。