a Department of Veterans Affairs , Tucson Vet Center.
b Department of Psychological Sciences , University of Missouri-St. Louis.
J Sex Res. 2017 Oct;54(8):971-983. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2017.1304519. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
The development of effective sexual aggression prevention programs for men relies on data garnered from studies using self-report measures of sexual aggression perpetration. However, few studies have focused on understanding and improving self-report measures of sexual aggression perpetration. The current study used open-ended interviews to explore the nature and frequency of community men's (N = 34) unintentional misreporting-including both overreporting and underreporting-on two self-report measures of sexual aggression perpetration: the Sexual Experiences Survey-Long Form Perpetration (SES-LFP; Koss et al., 2007) and the Sexual Strategies Scale (SSS; Strang, Peterson, Hill, & Heiman, 2013a). Item misinterpretation led to both overreporting and underreporting of sexual aggression, although underreporting was more common. Men's interpretations of items, decision-making processes, and reasons for producing discrepant reports across measures were analyzed and discussed. Results could help inform efforts to refine self-report measurement of men's sexual aggression.
有效的男性性侵犯预防计划的制定依赖于使用性侵犯实施的自我报告措施从研究中收集的数据。然而,很少有研究关注理解和改进性侵犯实施的自我报告措施。本研究使用开放式访谈,探讨了社区男性(N=34)在两种性侵犯实施的自我报告措施上无意误报的性质和频率:性经历调查-长式实施(SES-LFP;Koss 等人,2007 年)和性策略量表(SSS;Strang、Peterson、Hill 和 Heiman,2013a)。项目误解导致性侵犯的误报和漏报,尽管漏报更为常见。对男性对项目的解释、决策过程以及跨措施产生差异报告的原因进行了分析和讨论。研究结果可以帮助改进男性性侵犯的自我报告测量。