• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与者对问卷的接受程度会影响性侵犯发生率的统计结果。

Participant Acceptability of Questionnaires Impacts Sexual Victimization Prevalence Rates.

机构信息

University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, North Dakota, United States of America.

出版信息

J Child Sex Abus. 2023 Jul-Dec;32(6):771-789. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2023.2240778. Epub 2023 Aug 2.

DOI:10.1080/10538712.2023.2240778
PMID:37533189
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10528996/
Abstract

Obtaining accurate prevalence rates of sexual violence is made difficult by discrepancies in self-report questionnaires. Thus, the current study sought to explore participants' perceptions of acceptability (i.e., perceived difficulty and preference) as a potential mechanism of discrepancy between different questionnaires. Participants were 673 college students who completed two frequently used sexual victimization questionnaires, the Sexual Experiences Survey-Short Form Victimization (SES-SFV) and the Post-Refusal Sexual Persistence Scales-Victimization (PRSPS-V). Participants then answered questions about each measure's perceived difficulty and their preference between the two. Participants found the PRSPS-V easier to understand and preferred it 2.5 to 1 over the SES-SFV. Preference was related to reporting; participants who preferred the PRSPS-V reported more instances of sexual victimization on the PRSPS-V by 9.8%. Our results indicate that acceptability impacts reported prevalence rates and is one mechanism of discrepancy between questionnaires. Thus, researchers may wish to consider acceptability when choosing sexual victimization questionnaires.

摘要

获得性暴力的准确患病率是困难的,因为自我报告问卷存在差异。因此,本研究旨在探讨参与者对可接受性(即感知难度和偏好)的看法,作为不同问卷之间差异的潜在机制。参与者是 673 名大学生,他们完成了两个常用的性受害问卷,性经历调查-简短形式受害(SES-SFV)和拒绝后性坚持量表-受害(PRSPS-V)。然后,参与者回答了关于每个措施的感知难度和他们在两者之间的偏好的问题。参与者发现 PRSPS-V 更容易理解,并且更喜欢它 2.5 比 SES-SFV。偏好与报告有关;更喜欢 PRSPS-V 的参与者在 PRSPS-V 上报告的性受害事件多了 9.8%。我们的结果表明,可接受性影响报告的流行率,是问卷之间差异的机制之一。因此,研究人员在选择性受害问卷时可能希望考虑可接受性。

相似文献

1
Participant Acceptability of Questionnaires Impacts Sexual Victimization Prevalence Rates.参与者对问卷的接受程度会影响性侵犯发生率的统计结果。
J Child Sex Abus. 2023 Jul-Dec;32(6):771-789. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2023.2240778. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
2
Discrepant Responding across Measures of College Students' Sexual Victimization Experiences: Conceptual Replication and Extension.大学生性侵害经历测量中的差异反应:概念复制与拓展
J Sex Res. 2020 May-Jun;57(5):585-596. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2019.1669135. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
3
Valid for who? A preliminary investigation of the validity of two sexual victimization questionnaires in men and sexual minorities.对谁有效?对两份性侵害调查问卷在男性和性少数群体中的有效性进行的初步调查。
Am J Crim Justice. 2021 Feb;46(1):168-185. doi: 10.1007/s12103-020-09589-3. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
4
Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence victimization--national intimate partner and sexual violence survey, United States, 2011.性暴力、跟踪和亲密伴侣暴力受害的流行率和特征——2011 年美国全国亲密伴侣和性暴力调查。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2014 Sep 5;63(8):1-18.
5
Examining Women's Sexual Assault Victimization Experiences since Entering College via Two Behavioral Assessments.通过两项行为评估考察女性进入大学后的性侵犯受害经历。
J Sex Res. 2022 Jul;59(6):780-791. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2021.1994912. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
6
An Experimental Test of the Impact of Varying Questionnaire Response Format on Prevalence Rates for Sexual Violence Victimization and Perpetration.一种变化的调查问卷回答格式对性暴力受害和加害发生率影响的实验测试。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Dec;37(23-24):NP23541-NP23562. doi: 10.1177/08862605211064239. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
7
An examination of the disparity between self-identified versus legally identified rape victimization: A pilot study.自我认定与法律认定的强奸受害情况差异研究:一项试点研究。
J Am Coll Health. 2016 Jul;64(5):416-20. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2015.1107838. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
8
Sexual Assault Victimization Among Female Undergraduates During Study Abroad: A Single Campus Survey Study.留学期间女大学生遭受性侵犯情况:一项单校园调查研究
J Interpers Violence. 2015 Dec;30(20):3453-66. doi: 10.1177/0886260514563833. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
9
Study Title-Based Framing Effects on Reports of Sexual Violence and Associated Risk Factors in College Students.研究基于标题的框架效应对大学生中性暴力和相关风险因素报告的影响。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Sep;37(17-18):NP15359-NP15383. doi: 10.1177/08862605211016349. Epub 2021 May 15.
10
Sexual Assault Supportive Attitudes: Rape Myth Acceptance and Token Resistance in Greek and Non-Greek College Students From Two University Samples in the United States.性侵犯支持态度:美国两所大学的希腊裔和非希腊裔大学生中的强奸谬论接受和象征性抵制。
J Interpers Violence. 2018 Nov;33(22):3502-3530. doi: 10.1177/0886260516636064. Epub 2016 Mar 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring Measurement Strategies for Identifying Multiple-Perpetrator Sexual Violence: Higher Prevalence Rates Than Past Research.探索识别多人实施的性暴力的测量策略:患病率高于以往研究。
Aggress Behav. 2025 Mar;51(2):e70021. doi: 10.1002/ab.70021.
2
Words Can Hurt: A Taxonomy of Verbally Pressured Sexual Exploitation in the SES-V.言语施压型性剥削:SES-V 中的动词分类。
J Sex Res. 2024 Jul;61(6):882-896. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2024.2358414. Epub 2024 Jul 7.
3
Between "You" and "Me": Effects of Pronouns and Order on Disclosing Sexual Assault.“你”与“我”之间:代词及顺序对披露性侵犯事件的影响
J Sex Res. 2025 Feb;62(2):276-289. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2024.2341426. Epub 2024 Apr 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Test-Retest Reliabilities of Four Tactic-first Sexual Violence History Questionnaires.四种以策略为先的性暴力史调查问卷的重测信度
Psychol Violence. 2021 Nov;11(6):580-590. doi: 10.1037/vio0000384. Epub 2021 May 6.
2
An Initial Test of the Tactic-First and Item-Order Hypotheses: Accounting for Response Discrepancies in Sexual Victimization Questionnaires.策略优先和项目顺序假设的初步测试:解释性侵犯问卷中的反应差异
Am J Crim Justice. 2021 Feb;46(1):149-167. doi: 10.1007/s12103-020-09584-8. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
3
Valid for who? A preliminary investigation of the validity of two sexual victimization questionnaires in men and sexual minorities.对谁有效?对两份性侵害调查问卷在男性和性少数群体中的有效性进行的初步调查。
Am J Crim Justice. 2021 Feb;46(1):168-185. doi: 10.1007/s12103-020-09589-3. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
4
Discrepant Responding across Measures of College Students' Sexual Victimization Experiences: Conceptual Replication and Extension.大学生性侵害经历测量中的差异反应:概念复制与拓展
J Sex Res. 2020 May-Jun;57(5):585-596. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2019.1669135. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
5
A Trauma-Informed Approach to Sexual Violence Research Ethics and Open Science.创伤知情方法在性暴力研究伦理和开放科学中的应用。
J Interpers Violence. 2019 Dec;34(23-24):4765-4793. doi: 10.1177/0886260519871530.
6
The Frequency of Sexual Perpetration in College Men: A Systematic Review of Reported Prevalence Rates From 2000 to 2017.大学男性性侵害的发生率:对2000年至2017年报告患病率的系统评价
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2021 Jul;22(3):481-495. doi: 10.1177/1524838019860619. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
7
Recovery Assessment Scale-Domains and Stages: Measurement capacity, relevance, acceptability and feasibility of use with young people.康复评估量表-领域和阶段:在年轻人中使用的测量能力、相关性、可接受性和可行性。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;14(2):179-187. doi: 10.1111/eip.12842. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
8
Differential executive functioning in young adulthood as a function of experienced child abuse.儿童期虐待经历对青年期执行功能的影响
Int J Psychophysiol. 2019 Jan;135:126-135. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.12.004. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
9
Sexual Violence on Campus: Differences Across Gender and Sexual Minority Status.校园性暴力:基于性别和性少数群体地位的差异。
J Adolesc Health. 2018 Jun;62(6):701-707. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.12.013. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
10
Sexual assault victimization and psychopathology: A review and meta-analysis.性侵犯受害经历与精神病理学:一项综述与荟萃分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2017 Aug;56:65-81. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.06.002. Epub 2017 Jun 30.