Cianferotti Luisella, Bertoldo Francesco, Bischoff-Ferrari Heike A, Bruyere Olivier, Cooper Cyrus, Cutolo Maurizio, Kanis John A, Kaufman Jean-Marc, Reginster Jean-Yves, Rizzoli Rene, Brandi Maria Luisa
Bone Metabolic Diseases Unit, Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University Hospital of Florence and University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Endocrine. 2017 May;56(2):245-261. doi: 10.1007/s12020-017-1290-9. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
Optimal vitamin D status promotes skeletal health and is recommended with specific treatment in individuals at high risk for fragility fractures. A growing body of literature has provided indirect and some direct evidence for possible extraskeletal vitamin D-related effects.
Members of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis have reviewed the main evidence for possible proven benefits of vitamin D supplementation in adults at risk of or with overt chronic extra-skeletal diseases, providing recommendations and guidelines for future studies in this field.
Robust mechanistic evidence is available from in vitro studies and in vivo animal studies, usually employing cholecalciferol, calcidiol or calcitriol in pharmacologic rather than physiologic doses. Although many cross-sectional and prospective association studies in humans have shown that low 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels (i.e., <50 nmol/L) are consistently associated with chronic diseases, further strengthened by a dose-response relationship, several meta-analyses of clinical trials have shown contradictory results. Overall, large randomized controlled trials with sufficient doses of vitamin D are missing, and available small to moderate-size trials often included people with baseline levels of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels >50 nmol/L, did not simultaneously assess multiple outcomes, and did not report overall safety (e.g., falls). Thus, no recommendations can be made to date for the use of vitamin D supplementation in general, parental compounds, or non-hypercalcemic vitamin D analogs in the prevention and treatment of extra-skeletal chronic diseases. Moreover, attainment of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels well above the threshold desired for bone health cannot be recommended based on current evidence, since safety has yet to be confirmed. Finally, the promising findings from mechanistic studies, large cohort studies, and small clinical trials obtained for autoimmune diseases (including type 1 diabetes, multiple sclerosis, and systemic lupus erythematosus), cardiovascular disorders, and overall reduction in mortality require further confirmation.
最佳维生素D状态可促进骨骼健康,对于脆性骨折高危个体,建议进行特定治疗。越来越多的文献提供了间接证据以及一些直接证据,证明维生素D可能存在骨骼外相关作用。
欧洲骨质疏松症和骨关节炎临床与经济学会的成员回顾了维生素D补充剂对有发生明显慢性骨骼外疾病风险或已患有该疾病的成年人可能具有的已证实益处的主要证据,为该领域的未来研究提供建议和指南。
体外研究和体内动物研究提供了有力的机制证据,这些研究通常使用药理剂量而非生理剂量的胆钙化醇、骨化二醇或骨化三醇。尽管许多针对人类的横断面和前瞻性关联研究表明,低25-羟基维生素D水平(即<50 nmol/L)始终与慢性疾病相关,且剂量反应关系进一步强化了这一关联,但多项临床试验的荟萃分析得出了相互矛盾的结果。总体而言,缺乏足够剂量维生素D的大型随机对照试验,现有的中小型试验通常纳入血清25-羟基维生素D水平>50 nmol/L的人群,未同时评估多个结局,也未报告总体安全性(如跌倒情况)。因此,目前无法就使用维生素D补充剂、母体化合物或非高钙血症维生素D类似物预防和治疗骨骼外慢性疾病给出建议。此外,基于现有证据,不建议将血清25-羟基维生素D水平提升至远高于骨骼健康所需阈值,因为安全性尚未得到证实。最后,机制研究、大型队列研究和小型临床试验在自身免疫性疾病(包括1型糖尿病、多发性硬化症和系统性红斑狼疮)、心血管疾病以及总体死亡率降低方面取得的有前景的结果需要进一步证实。