Bynum Julie P W, Chang Chiang-Hua, Austin Andrea, Carmichael Don, Meara Ellen
Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Sep;65(9):1916-1923. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14882. Epub 2017 Apr 8.
To determine whether receiving the predominance of ambulatory visits from a primary care provider compared to a specialty provider is associated with better outcomes in older adults with multi morbidity.
Observational study using propensity score matching.
Medicare fee-for-service, 2011-12.
Beneficiaries aged 65 and older with multimorbidity.
The independent variable was an indicator for having a specialty (versus primary care) as the predominant provider of care (PPC). Main outcomes were 1-year mortality, hospitalization, standardized expenditures, and ambulatory visit patterns.
Two-thirds of 3,934,942 beneficiaries with multimorbidity had a primary care provider as their PPC. Individuals with a specialty PPC had more hospitalizations (40.3 more per 1,000) and higher spending ($1,781 more per beneficiary) than those with a primary care PPC, but there was little difference in mortality (0.2% higher) or preventable hospitalizations. Spending differences were largest for professional fees ($769 higher per beneficiary), inpatient stays ($572 higher per beneficiary), and outpatient facilities ($510 higher per beneficiary) (all P < .001). In addition, people with a specialist PPC had lower continuity of care and saw more providers.
Older adults with multimorbidity with a specialist as their main ambulatory care provider had higher spending and lower continuity of care than those whose PPC was in primary care but similar clinical outcomes.
确定与专科医疗服务提供者相比,以初级医疗服务提供者为主进行门诊就诊,是否与患有多种疾病的老年人的更好预后相关。
采用倾向得分匹配的观察性研究。
2011 - 2012年医疗保险按服务收费。
65岁及以上患有多种疾病的受益人。
自变量是将专科医疗服务提供者(相对于初级医疗服务提供者)作为主要医疗服务提供者(PPC)的指标。主要结局包括1年死亡率、住院情况、标准化支出和门诊就诊模式。
在3934942名患有多种疾病的受益人中,三分之二的人的主要医疗服务提供者是初级医疗服务提供者。与以初级医疗服务提供者作为主要医疗服务提供者的人相比,以专科医疗服务提供者作为主要医疗服务提供者的人住院次数更多(每1000人多40.3次),支出更高(每位受益人多1781美元),但在死亡率(高0.2%)或可避免的住院方面差异不大。支出差异在专业费用方面最大(每位受益人高769美元)、住院费用方面(每位受益人高572美元)和门诊设施费用方面(每位受益人高510美元)(均P < 0.001)。此外,以专科医疗服务提供者作为主要医疗服务提供者的人医疗连续性较低,就诊的医疗服务提供者更多。
患有多种疾病且以专科医生作为主要门诊医疗服务提供者的老年人,与以初级医疗服务提供者作为主要医疗服务提供者的老年人相比,支出更高,医疗连续性更低,但临床结局相似。