• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

水牙线与牙间隙刷在去除牙菌斑方面的比较:一项一次性试点研究。

Comparison of Water Flosser and Interdental Brush on Plaque Removal: A Single-Use Pilot Study.

作者信息

Lyle Deborah M, Goyal C Ram, Qaqish Jimmy G, Schuller Reinhard

机构信息

Water Pik, Inc., Fort Collins, CO, USA.

All Sum Research Center, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Dent. 2016 Mar;27(1):23-26.

PMID:28390213
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this randomized, single-use, single-blind, two-group, parallel pilot study was to compare the plaque removal ability of a water flosser and interdental brush when used in combination with a manual toothbrush.

METHODS

Twenty-eight (28) subjects completed the study. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of two groups: Waterpik®Water Flosser (WF) plus manual tooth brushing or interdental brushes (IDB) plus manual tooth brushing. Pre-cleaning plaque scores were obtained using the Rustogi Modification of the Navy Plaque Index (RMNPI). Subjects were instructed on the use of their interdental product. Post-cleaning scores were obtained after a supervised brushing and use of the interdental device. Scores were recorded for whole mouth, marginal, approximal, facial, and lingual regions for each subject.

RESULTS

There were no differences between the groups for pre-cleaning plaque scores for whole mouth, marginal, approximal, facial, or lingual regions. Both groups showed significant reductions in plaque from baseline for all areas measured (p < 0.001). The WF group was significantly more effective than the IDB group for removing plaque from all areas measured. Specifically, the WF was 18% more effective for whole mouth and marginal areas, 20% for approximal areas, 11% for facial areas, and 29% for lingual areas.

CONCLUSIONS

The Waterpik Water Flosser and manual toothbrush removes significantly more plaque from tooth surfaces (whole mouth, marginal, approximal, facial, and lingual) than interdental brushes and a manual toothbrush after a single use.

摘要

目的

本随机、一次性使用、单盲、两组平行的试点研究旨在比较水牙线和牙间隙刷与手动牙刷联合使用时的牙菌斑清除能力。

方法

28名受试者完成了该研究。受试者被随机分配到两组中的一组:Waterpik®水牙线(WF)加手动刷牙或牙间隙刷(IDB)加手动刷牙。使用海军牙菌斑指数的Rustogi改良版(RMNPI)获得清洁前的牙菌斑评分。指导受试者使用牙间隙清洁产品。在监督刷牙和使用牙间隙清洁装置后获得清洁后的评分。记录每个受试者全口、边缘、邻面、颊面和舌面区域的评分。

结果

两组在全口、边缘、邻面、颊面或舌面区域的清洁前牙菌斑评分无差异。两组在所有测量区域的牙菌斑均较基线有显著减少(p < 0.001)。在所有测量区域,WF组清除牙菌斑的效果明显优于IDB组。具体而言,WF在全口和边缘区域的效果高18%,邻面区域高20%,颊面区域高11%,舌面区域高29%。

结论

一次性使用后,Waterpik水牙线和手动牙刷比牙间隙刷和手动牙刷能显著清除更多牙齿表面(全口、边缘、邻面、颊面和舌面)的牙菌斑。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Water Flosser and Interdental Brush on Plaque Removal: A Single-Use Pilot Study.水牙线与牙间隙刷在去除牙菌斑方面的比较:一项一次性试点研究。
J Clin Dent. 2016 Mar;27(1):23-26.
2
Comparison of Water Flosser and Interdental Brush on Reduction of Gingival Bleeding and Plaque: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.水牙线与牙间刷在减少牙龈出血和牙菌斑方面的比较:一项随机对照试验性研究
J Clin Dent. 2016 Jun;27(2):61-65.
3
Comparison of two power interdental cleaning devices on plaque removal.两种电动齿间清洁装置在去除牙菌斑方面的比较。
J Clin Dent. 2012;23(1):17-21.
4
The addition of a water flosser to power tooth brushing: effect on bleeding, gingivitis, and plaque.在电动牙刷的基础上增加水牙线:对出血、牙龈炎和牙菌斑的影响。
J Clin Dent. 2012;23(2):57-63.
5
Evaluation of the plaque removal efficacy of a water flosser compared to string floss in adults after a single use.一次性使用后,比较水牙线与牙线对成人牙菌斑清除效果的评估。
J Clin Dent. 2013;24(2):37-42.
6
Comparison of two power interdental cleaning devices on the reduction of gingivitis.两种电动牙间隙清洁装置对牙龈炎减轻效果的比较。
J Clin Dent. 2012;23(1):22-6.
7
Evaluation of the Addition of a Water Flosser to Manual Brushing on Gingival Health.评估在手动刷牙基础上添加水牙线对牙龈健康的影响。
J Clin Dent. 2018 Dec;29(4):81-86.
8
Efficacy of Two Interdental Cleaning Devices on Clinical Signs of Inflammation: A Four-Week Randomized Controlled Trial.两种牙间隙清洁装置对炎症临床体征的疗效:一项为期四周的随机对照试验。
J Clin Dent. 2015;26(2):55-60.
9
Evaluation of the plaque removal efficacy of three power toothbrushes.三种电动牙刷清除牙菌斑效果的评估
J Int Acad Periodontol. 2006 Jul;8(3):83-8.
10
Effectiveness of a sonic-flosser toothbrush with different size brush heads and manual toothbrush plus dental floss on plaque, gingival bleeding and inflammation in adults with naturally occurring gingivitis: A 4-week randomized controlled trial.不同尺寸刷头的声波牙刷与手动牙刷加牙线对患有自然发生牙龈炎的成年人的菌斑、牙龈出血和炎症的效果:一项为期 4 周的随机对照试验。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2023 Aug;21(3):624-633. doi: 10.1111/idh.12675. Epub 2023 May 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Innovations in oral hygiene tools: a mini review on recent developments.口腔卫生工具的创新:近期发展的小型综述
Front Dent Med. 2024 Aug 14;5:1442887. doi: 10.3389/fdmed.2024.1442887. eCollection 2024.
2
Efficacy of oral irrigators compared to other interdental aids for managing peri-implant diseases: a systematic review.与其他牙间隙清洁辅助工具相比,口腔冲洗器在治疗种植体周围疾病方面的疗效:一项系统评价。
BDJ Open. 2025 Jan 29;11(1):7. doi: 10.1038/s41405-025-00301-3.
3
Cleansing efficacy of an oral irrigator with microburst technology in adolescent orthodontic patients. A randomized-controlled crossover study.
带有微爆技术的口腔冲洗器对青少年正畸患者的清洁效果。一项随机对照交叉研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Sep 13;28(10):524. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05842-9.
4
Efficacy of a water flosser compared to an interdental brush on gingival bleeding and gingival abrasion: A 4 week randomized controlled trial.水牙线与牙间隙刷对牙龈出血和牙龈磨损的疗效比较:一项为期4周的随机对照试验。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2025 Feb;23(1):176-185. doi: 10.1111/idh.12817. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
5
Effects of water flossing on gingival inflammation and supragingival plaque microbiota: a 12-week randomized controlled trial.水牙线对牙龈炎和龈上菌斑微生物群的影响:一项为期 12 周的随机对照试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Aug;27(8):4567-4577. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05081-4. Epub 2023 May 25.
6
The use of interdental cleaning devices and periodontal disease contingent on the number of remaining teeth in Korean adults.使用牙间清洁器械与牙周病取决于韩国成年人的剩余牙齿数量。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 16;12(1):13853. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17885-7.
7
Dental Floss Prescription Pattern among the Dental Interns of Nepal.尼泊尔牙科实习生的牙线处方模式。
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2020 Aug 31;58(228):580-586. doi: 10.31729/jnma.5133.
8
Effect of water-jet flossing on surface roughness and color stability of dental resin-based composites.水喷射牙线清洁对牙科树脂基复合材料表面粗糙度和颜色稳定性的影响。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2020 Feb 1;12(2):e169-e177. doi: 10.4317/jced.56153. eCollection 2020 Feb.
9
The use of an interdental brush mitigates periodontal health inequalities: the Korean National Health and nutrition examination survey (KNHANES).使用牙间刷可以减轻牙周健康不平等现象:韩国国民健康营养调查(KNHANES)。
BMC Oral Health. 2019 Jul 29;19(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0858-6.
10
An Overview of Different Interdental Cleaning Aids and Their Effectiveness.不同牙间隙清洁辅助工具及其效果概述
Dent J (Basel). 2019 Jun 1;7(2):56. doi: 10.3390/dj7020056.