Suppr超能文献

一项比较研究:“课堂应答器”能否提高学生在多学科临床微生物学教学中的参与度?

A comparative study: do "clickers" increase student engagement in multidisciplinary clinical microbiology teaching?

作者信息

Stevens Niall T, McDermott Hélène, Boland Fiona, Pawlikowska Teresa, Humphreys Hilary

机构信息

Department of Clinical Microbiology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, RCSI Education and Research Centre, Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont, Dublin 9, Ireland.

Division of Population Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Beaux Lane House, Lower Mercer Street, Dublin 2, Ireland.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2017 Apr 8;17(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0906-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Audience response devices, or "clickers", have been used in the education of future healthcare professionals for several years with varying success. They have been reported to improve the learning experience by promoting engagement and knowledge retention. In 2014, our department evaluated the use of "clickers" in a newly introduced multidisciplinary approach to teaching large groups of third year medical students clinical cases developed around a microbiology theme.

METHODS

Six multidisciplinary teaching sessions covering community-acquired pneumonia, tuberculosis, infective endocarditis, peritonitis, bloodstream infection with pyelonephritis and bacterial meningitis were included in the study. Three involved the use of the "clickers" and three did not. Consenting undergraduate students attended the designated classes and afterwards answered a short online quiz relating to the session. Students also answered a short questionnaire about the "clickers" to gauge their attitudes on the use of these devices.

RESULTS

Of 310 students, 294 (94.8%) agreed to participate in the study. Interestingly, the grades of online quizzes after a session where a "clicker" was used were slightly lower. Looking only at the grades of students who engaged completely with the process (n = 19), there was no statistical difference to suggest that the devices had a positive or negative impact on knowledge retention. However, student attitudes to using the devices were positive overall. Fifty-five percent strongly agreed and 27% agreed that teaching sessions where the "clickers" were used were more engaging. Thirty-four percent strongly agreed and 36% agreed that the "clickers" made important concepts more memorable and 54% felt the device enhanced their understanding of the topic being covered.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, it appears that "clickers" help in improving student engagement in large classroom environments, enhance the learning experience, and are received positively by medical students but their impact on knowledge retention is variable.

摘要

背景

观众反应设备,即“点击器”,已在未来医疗保健专业人员的教育中使用了数年,效果各异。据报道,它们通过促进参与度和知识保留来改善学习体验。2014年,我们部门评估了“点击器”在一种新引入的多学科教学方法中的使用情况,该方法用于教授一大群三年级医学生围绕微生物学主题开发的临床病例。

方法

本研究纳入了六次多学科教学课程,内容涵盖社区获得性肺炎、肺结核、感染性心内膜炎、腹膜炎、伴有肾盂肾炎的血流感染和细菌性脑膜炎。其中三次使用了“点击器”,三次未使用。同意参与的本科生参加指定课程,之后回答与该课程相关的简短在线测验。学生们还回答了一份关于“点击器”的简短问卷,以了解他们对使用这些设备的态度。

结果

在310名学生中,294名(94.8%)同意参与研究。有趣的是,使用“点击器”的课程之后的在线测验成绩略低。仅看完全参与该过程的学生(n = 19)的成绩,没有统计学差异表明这些设备对知识保留有积极或消极影响。然而,学生对使用这些设备的态度总体上是积极的。55%的学生强烈同意,27%的学生同意使用“点击器 ”的教学课程更具吸引力。34 %的学生强烈同意,36%的学生同意“点击器”使重要概念更易记忆,54%的学生认为该设备增强了他们对所涵盖主题的理解。

结论

总体而言,“点击器”似乎有助于提高学生在大课堂环境中的参与度,增强学习体验,并且受到医学生的积极认可,但它们对知识保留的影响是可变的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21c1/5385002/ba4fc83bc6d0/12909_2017_906_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验