BIOEPAR, INRA, Oniris, La Chantrerie, F-44307 Nantes, France; Valorex, La Messayais, F-35210 Combourtillé, France.
Unité de Recherche sur les Systèmes d'Elevage, Univ Bretagne Loire, Ecole Supérieure d'Agricultures, 55 rue Rabelais, F-49007 Angers, France.
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Jun;100(6):4394-4408. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11850. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
The objectives of this study were to quantify the effects on production performance and milk fatty acid (FA) profile of feeding dairy cows extruded linseed (EL), a feed rich in α-linolenic acid, and to assess the variability of the responses related to the dose of EL and the basal diet composition. This meta-analysis was carried out using only data from trials including a control diet without fat supplementation. The dependent variables were defined by the mean differences between values from EL-supplemented groups and values from control groups. The data were processed by regression testing the dose effect, multivariable regression testing the effect of each potential interfering factor associated with the dose effect, and then stepwise regression with backward elimination procedure with all potential interfering factors retained in previous steps. This entire strategy was also applied to a restricted data set, including only trials conducted inside a practical range of fat feeding (only supplemented diets with <60 g of fat/kg of dry matter and supplemented with <600 g of fat from EL). The whole data set consisted of 17 publications, representing 21 control diets and 29 EL-supplemented diets. The daily intake of fat from EL supplementation ranged from 87 to 1,194 g/cow per day. The dry matter intake was numerically reduced in high-fat diets. Extruded linseed supplementation increased milk yield (0.72 kg/d in the restricted data set) and decreased milk protein content by a dilutive effect (-0.58 g/kg in the restricted data set). No effect of dose or diet was identified on dry matter intake, milk yield, or milk protein content. Milk fat content decreased when EL was supplemented to diets with high proportion of corn silage in the forage (-2.8 g/kg between low and high corn silage-based diets in the restricted data set) but did not decrease when the diet contained alfalfa hay. Milk trans-10 18:1 proportion increased when EL was supplemented to high corn silage-based diets. A shift in ruminal biohydrogenation pathways, from trans-11 18:1 to trans-10 18:1, probably occurred when supplementing EL with high corn silage-based diets related to a change in the activity or composition of the microbial equilibrium in the rumen. The sum of pairs 4:0 to 14:0 (FA synthesized de novo by the udder), palmitic acid, and the sum of saturated FA decreased linearly, whereas oleic acid, vaccenic acid, rumenic acid, α-linolenic acid, and the sums of mono- and polyunsaturated FA increased linearly when the daily intake of fat from EL was increased. In experimental conditions, EL supplementation increased linearly proportions of potentially human health-beneficial FA in milk (i.e., oleic acid, vaccenic acid, rumenic acid, α-linolenic acid, total polyunsaturated FA), but should be used cautiously in corn silage-based diets.
本研究的目的是量化给奶牛投喂富含 α-亚麻酸的挤压亚麻籽(EL)对生产性能和牛奶脂肪酸(FA)谱的影响,并评估与 EL 剂量和基础日粮组成相关的反应的可变性。这项荟萃分析仅使用了不添加脂肪的对照日粮的试验数据。因变量由 EL 补充组与对照组之间的差异平均值定义。通过回归检验剂量效应、多元回归检验与剂量效应相关的每个潜在干扰因素的效应、然后采用逐步回归和向后消除程序保留前几步中的所有潜在干扰因素,对数据进行处理。整个策略也应用于一个受限数据集,其中仅包括在脂肪喂养的实际范围内进行的试验(仅补充脂肪含量<60g/kg 干物质的日粮,且仅从 EL 补充<600g 脂肪)。整个数据集由 17 篇出版物组成,代表 21 个对照日粮和 29 个 EL 补充日粮。EL 补充的脂肪日摄入量范围为 87-1194g/头/天。高脂肪日粮的干物质摄入量略有减少。挤压亚麻籽的补充增加了牛奶产量(在受限数据集中为 0.72kg/d),并通过稀释效应降低了牛奶蛋白含量(在受限数据集中为-0.58g/kg)。剂量或日粮对干物质摄入量、牛奶产量或牛奶蛋白含量没有影响。当 EL 补充到以玉米青贮为主要饲料的日粮中时,牛奶脂肪含量降低(在受限数据集中,低玉米青贮和高玉米青贮日粮之间降低了 2.8g/kg),但当日粮中含有苜蓿干草时,牛奶脂肪含量不降低。当 EL 补充到高玉米青贮日粮中时,牛奶中转-10 18:1 的比例增加。当补充 EL 与高玉米青贮日粮相关时,瘤胃生物氢化途径可能从反式-11 18:1 转变为反式-10 18:1,这可能与瘤胃微生物平衡的活性或组成的变化有关。从头合成的 FA(4:0 到 14:0)、棕榈酸和饱和 FA 的总和线性降低,而油酸、油酸、瘤胃酸、α-亚麻酸和单不饱和及多不饱和 FA 的总和线性增加,当 EL 摄入的脂肪量增加时。在实验条件下,EL 补充使牛奶中潜在有益于人类健康的 FA 的比例线性增加(即油酸、油酸、瘤胃酸、α-亚麻酸、总多不饱和 FA),但在以玉米青贮为基础的日粮中应谨慎使用。