Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, 308 Harvard St. S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Department of Psychology, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, 3333 Green Bay Road, North Chicago, IL 60064, USA.
Schizophr Res. 2017 Dec;190:129-135. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.03.034. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
Patients with psychotic disorders are often treated with numerous medications, many of which have anticholinergic activity. We assessed cognition in relation to the cumulative anticholinergic burden of multiple drugs included in treatment regimens of participants from the Bipolar-Schizophrenia Network on Intermediate Phenotypes (B-SNIP) study.
Clinically stable participants with schizophrenia (n=206), schizoaffective disorder (n=131), and psychotic bipolar disorder (n=146) were examined. Anticholinergic properties of all scheduled drugs were quantified using the Anticholinergic Drug Scale (ADS). ADS scores were summed across individual drugs to create a total ADS burden score for each participant and examined in relation to the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS).
Anticholinergic burden aggregated across all medications was inversely related to cognitive performance starting at ADS scores of 4 in participants with schizophrenia. Those with ADS scores ≥4 had lower composite BACS scores compared to those with ADS<4 (p=0.004). Among BACS subtests, Verbal Memory was the most adversely affected by high anticholinergic burden. Despite similar anticholinergic burden scores across groups, a significant threshold effect of anticholinergic burden was not detected in schizoaffective or psychotic bipolar disorder.
We identified an adverse effect threshold of anticholinergic burden on cognition in clinically stable participants with schizophrenia. This relationship was not identified in affective psychoses. Examination of other medications, doses, and clinical measures did not account for these findings. Patients with schizophrenia may have increased cognitive susceptibility to anticholinergic medications and the aggregate effects of one's medication regimen may be important to consider in clinical practice.
精神障碍患者常需使用多种药物治疗,其中许多药物具有抗胆碱能活性。我们评估了认知功能与参与者的治疗方案中包含的多种药物的累积抗胆碱能负担之间的关系,这些参与者来自双相情感障碍-精神分裂症网络中间表型(B-SNIP)研究。
检查了 206 名精神分裂症患者、131 名分裂情感障碍患者和 146 名精神病性双相情感障碍患者的临床稳定状态。使用抗胆碱能药物量表(ADS)对所有计划药物的抗胆碱能特性进行量化。将个体药物的 ADS 评分相加,为每个参与者创建一个总 ADS 负担评分,并与简明精神分裂症认知评估(BACS)进行比较。
从精神分裂症患者的 ADS 评分达到 4 分开始,所有药物累加的抗胆碱能负担与认知表现呈负相关。那些 ADS 评分≥4 的人比 ADS<4 的人综合 BACS 评分低(p=0.004)。在 BACS 子测试中,言语记忆受高抗胆碱能负担的影响最大。尽管在各组中抗胆碱能负担评分相似,但在分裂情感性或精神病性双相情感障碍中并未检测到抗胆碱能负担的显著阈值效应。
我们在临床稳定的精神分裂症患者中确定了抗胆碱能负担对认知的不良影响阈值。在情感性精神病中未发现这种关系。对其他药物、剂量和临床指标的检查并不能解释这些发现。精神分裂症患者可能对抗胆碱能药物的认知敏感性增加,而一个人的药物治疗方案的累积效应在临床实践中可能很重要。