• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初次全膝关节置换术后假体周围骨折的术前预后评估指标有哪些?

What Are the Preoperative Outcome Measures That Predispose to Periprosthetic Fractures After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty?

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Republic of Singapore.

Centre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, Republic of Singapore.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2017 Aug;32(8):2531-2534. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.03.013. Epub 2017 Mar 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2017.03.013
PMID:28390885
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is little known in the literature about whether preoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) would affect the risk of periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Our study aims to evaluate the predictive values of PROMs on PPF after primary TKA. We hypothesize that poorer PROMs are associated with a higher risk of PPF after primary TKA.

METHODS

We reviewed prospectively collected data in our hospital arthroplasty registry. Patients who sustained PPF after primary TKA between 2000 and 2015 were identified. Forty-two patients were identified and matched for gender, age, and body mass index to a control group of 84 patients who had primary TKA without PPF in a 2:1 ratio. Preoperative demographics, Short Form-36 (SF-36) scores, Oxford Knee score and Knee Society Score were evaluated. Variables of PROMs were entered into a multivariate logistic regression model. A variable was considered to be a significant predictor if its odds ratio was significant at P < .05.

RESULTS

After multivariate regression analysis, SF-36 subdomains of physical functioning (PF) and vitality (VT) were identified as significant predictors for PPFs after primary TKA. A lower SF-36 PF and VT scores were associated with higher risks of sustaining a PPF after primary TKA.

CONCLUSION

From our study, low preoperative SF-36 PF and VT scores are associated with a higher risk of PPFs after primary TKA. These results can allow the preoperative identification of patients at higher risk of PPF, and appropriate preoperative counseling, optimization, and close follow-up can be instituted for this at-risk group.

摘要

背景

文献中对于术前患者报告的结局测量(PROMs)是否会影响初次全膝关节置换(TKA)后假体周围骨折(PPF)的风险知之甚少。我们的研究旨在评估 PROMs 对初次 TKA 后 PPF 的预测价值。我们假设较差的 PROMs 与初次 TKA 后 PPF 的风险增加相关。

方法

我们回顾了我院关节置换登记处前瞻性收集的数据。确定了 2000 年至 2015 年间初次 TKA 后发生 PPF 的患者。按照性别、年龄和体重指数,以 2:1 的比例将 42 例患者与初次 TKA 无 PPF 的对照组 84 例患者进行匹配。评估术前人口统计学、SF-36(健康调查简表)评分、牛津膝关节评分和膝关节协会评分。将 PROMs 的变量纳入多变量逻辑回归模型。如果其优势比在 P <.05 时具有统计学意义,则认为该变量是显著的预测因子。

结果

经过多变量回归分析,SF-36 子领域的身体功能(PF)和活力(VT)被确定为初次 TKA 后 PPF 的显著预测因子。SF-36 PF 和 VT 评分较低与初次 TKA 后发生 PPF 的风险增加相关。

结论

根据我们的研究,术前 SF-36 PF 和 VT 评分较低与初次 TKA 后 PPF 的风险增加相关。这些结果可以让我们在术前识别出发生 PPF 风险较高的患者,并为这一高危人群提供适当的术前咨询、优化和密切随访。

相似文献

1
What Are the Preoperative Outcome Measures That Predispose to Periprosthetic Fractures After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty?初次全膝关节置换术后假体周围骨折的术前预后评估指标有哪些?
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Aug;32(8):2531-2534. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.03.013. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
2
Megaprostheses in the treatment of periprosthetic fractures of the knee joint: indication, technique, results and review of literature.膝关节假体周围骨折治疗中的大假体:适应证、技术、结果及文献综述
Int Orthop. 2016 May;40(5):935-43. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2991-4. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
3
Can Preoperative Patient-reported Outcome Measures Be Used to Predict Meaningful Improvement in Function After TKA?术前患者报告的结局指标能否用于预测全膝关节置换术后功能的显著改善?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jan;475(1):149-157. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4770-y.
4
Periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后假体周围骨折
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2014 Apr;22(1):24-9. doi: 10.1177/230949901402200108.
5
The Prevalence and Predictors of Patient Dissatisfaction 5-years Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.初次全膝关节置换术后5年患者不满意的患病率及预测因素
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Jun;37(6S):S121-S128. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.02.077. Epub 2022 Feb 26.
6
Single-Stage Revision of the Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Associated With Improved Functional Outcomes: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.感染性全膝关节置换术的单阶段翻修与功能结局改善相关:一项倾向评分匹配队列研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jan;36(1):298-304. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.07.012. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
7
Revision total knee arthroplasty for failed high tibial osteotomy and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty have similar patient-reported outcome measures in a two-year follow-up study.在一项为期两年的随访研究中,针对失败的高位胫骨截骨术和单髁膝关节置换术进行的全膝关节翻修术,患者报告的结局指标相似。
Bone Joint J. 2017 Oct;99-B(10):1329-1334. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B10.BJJ-2017-0034.R1.
8
Change in Body Mass Index After Total Knee Arthroplasty and Its Influence on Functional Outcome.全膝关节置换术后体重指数的变化及其对功能结局的影响。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Mar;33(3):718-722. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.10.046. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
9
The impact of prior fragility fractures on long-term periprosthetic fracture risk following total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后既往脆性骨折对假体周围骨折长期风险的影响。
Osteoporos Int. 2023 Aug;34(8):1429-1436. doi: 10.1007/s00198-023-06746-2. Epub 2023 May 11.
10
Comparison of outcome measures from different pathways following total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后不同路径的疗效指标比较。
Singapore Med J. 2018 Sep;59(9):476-486. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2018011. Epub 2018 Jan 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of Incidence and Risk Factors for Periprosthetic Fracture after Total Knee Arthroplasty in South Korea from 2010 to 2020 Based on National Registry Data.基于国家登记数据对2010年至2020年韩国全膝关节置换术后假体周围骨折的发病率及危险因素分析
Clin Orthop Surg. 2025 Jun;17(3):408-416. doi: 10.4055/cios24250. Epub 2025 May 15.
2
Transfemoral Osseointegration in Association With Total Hip Replacement: Observational Cohort Study of Patients With Follow-Up Exceeding 2 Years.经股骨干骨整合与全髋关节置换术:随访超过2年患者的观察性队列研究。
Arthroplast Today. 2024 Jul 20;28:101463. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101463. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Global mapping of institutional and hospital-based (Level II-IV) arthroplasty registries: a scoping review.
全球范围内机构和医院为基础(二级至四级)关节置换术登记处的绘制:范围综述。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Feb;34(2):1219-1251. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03691-y. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
4
Evaluation of FRAX in patients with periprosthetic fractures following primary total hip and knee arthroplasty.评估原发性全髋关节和全膝关节置换术后假体周围骨折患者的 FRAX 风险。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 2;13(1):7145. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34230-8.
5
Risk factors of early periprosthetic femoral fracture after total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后早期假体周围股骨骨折的危险因素。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Dec 2;22(1):1009. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04875-5.
6
Anterior femoral notching ≥ 3 mm is associated with increased risk for supracondylar periprosthetic femoral fracture after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.股骨髁前方切迹≥3毫米与全膝关节置换术后髁上假体周围股骨骨折风险增加相关:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2022 Apr;32(3):383-393. doi: 10.1007/s00590-021-02989-z. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
7
Comparison of implant related complications amongst patients with opioid use disorder and non-users following total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后阿片类药物使用障碍患者与非使用者之间植入物相关并发症的比较。
World J Orthop. 2019 Mar 18;10(3):137-144. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v10.i3.137.
8
Impact of time to surgery from injury on postoperative infection and deep vein thrombosis in periprosthetic knee fractures.受伤至手术的时间对人工膝关节周围骨折术后感染和深静脉血栓形成的影响。
Chin J Traumatol. 2018 Dec;21(6):329-332. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2018.03.005. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
9
Comparison of implant survivability in primary 1- to 2-level lumbar fusion amongst opioid abusers and non-opioid abusers.阿片类药物滥用者与非阿片类药物滥用者在初次1至2节段腰椎融合术中植入物生存率的比较。
J Spine Surg. 2018 Sep;4(3):568-574. doi: 10.21037/jss.2018.07.07.