Bai Jianying, Dong Xue, He Sheng, Bao Min
CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Beijing 100101, China.
CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Beijing 100101, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China.
Neuroscience. 2017 Jun 3;352:122-130. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.03.053. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
Ocular dominance has been extensively studied, often with the goal to understand neuroplasticity, which is a key characteristic within the critical period. Recent work on monocular deprivation, however, demonstrates residual neuroplasticity in the adult visual cortex. After deprivation of patterned inputs by monocular patching, the patched eye becomes more dominant. Since patching blocks both the Fourier amplitude and phase information of the input image, it remains unclear whether deprivation of the Fourier phase information alone is able to reshape eye dominance. Here, for the first time, we show that removing of the phase regularity without changing the amplitude spectra of the input image induced a shift of eye dominance toward the deprived eye, but only if the eye dominance was measured with a binocular rivalry task rather than an interocular phase combination task. These different results indicate that the two measurements are supported by different mechanisms. Phase integration requires the fusion of monocular images. The fused percept highly relies on the weights of the phase-sensitive monocular neurons that respond to the two monocular images. However, binocular rivalry reflects the result of direct interocular competition that strongly weights the contour information transmitted along each monocular pathway. Monocular phase deprivation may not change the weights in the integration (fusion) mechanism much, but alters the balance in the rivalry (competition) mechanism. Our work suggests that ocular dominance plasticity may occur at different stages of visual processing, and that homeostatic compensation also occurs for the lack of phase regularity in natural scenes.
眼优势已经得到了广泛研究,其目的通常是为了理解神经可塑性,这是关键期内的一个关键特征。然而,最近关于单眼剥夺的研究表明,成年视觉皮层中存在残余神经可塑性。在通过单眼罩剥夺有图案的输入后,被遮盖的眼睛变得更具优势。由于遮盖会阻断输入图像的傅里叶幅度和相位信息,因此尚不清楚仅剥夺傅里叶相位信息是否能够重塑眼优势。在这里,我们首次表明,在不改变输入图像幅度谱的情况下去除相位规律性会导致眼优势向被剥夺眼转移,但前提是使用双眼竞争任务而非眼间相位组合任务来测量眼优势。这些不同的结果表明,这两种测量方法由不同的机制支持。相位整合需要单眼图像的融合。融合后的感知高度依赖于对两个单眼图像做出反应的相位敏感单眼神经元的权重。然而,双眼竞争反映了直接的眼间竞争结果,这种竞争强烈地权衡了沿每条单眼通路传输的轮廓信息。单眼相位剥夺可能不会对整合(融合)机制中的权重产生太大影响,但会改变竞争机制中的平衡。我们的研究表明,眼优势可塑性可能发生在视觉处理的不同阶段,并且对于自然场景中相位规律性的缺乏也会发生稳态补偿。