Nelson Antonia M
Antonia M. Nelson is an Associate Professor of Nursing, Saint Anselm College, Manchester, NH. The author can be reached via e-mail at
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2017 Jul/Aug;42(4):216-225. doi: 10.1097/NMC.0000000000000344.
Swaddling has been practiced since antiquity; however, there is controversy about its safety.
The purpose of this review is to update and build upon previous reviews and synthesize evidence on risks and benefits of swaddling in healthy-term, near-term, or older infants.
MEDLINE (1960-May 13, 2016) and CINAHL (1963-May 13, 2016) searches were conducted, relevant articles retrieved, and citation lists reviewed for other references.
A table summarizes study details. Selected older references and supporting literature are integrated into the synthesis to provide context.
Swaddling calms infants and promotes sleep, but it is equally or less effective than other nonpharmacological methods in managing pain. There may be a slight risk for sudden infant death syndrome associated with supine swaddling, although the impact of confounding variables is unclear. Early skin-to-skin contact supports early breastfeeding, but swaddling does not have a negative impact on breastfeeding long term. Swaddling tightly around the hips is strongly associated with developmental dysplasia of the hip. More research is needed on the impact of swaddling on pain in term infants, infant vital signs, arousal thresholds, and a possible association between swaddling, vitamin D deficiency, and acute lower respiratory tract infection.
The number of studies was small, with few randomized control trials, and researchers used different definitions of swaddling.
If a few precautions are taken, such as swaddling securely to minimize risk of unwrapping, avoiding overheating, placing infants to sleep supine, and discontinuing swaddling when infants first show signs of rolling over, swaddling presents minimal risk.
Maternity and neonatal nurses should model swaddling practices based on the evidence and promote informed decision-making among infant caregivers.
襁褓包裹法自古以来就被使用;然而,其安全性存在争议。
本综述的目的是更新并在先前综述的基础上进行拓展,综合健康足月儿、近足月儿或较大婴儿使用襁褓包裹法的风险和益处的证据。
检索了MEDLINE(1960年至2016年5月13日)和CINAHL(1963年至2016年5月13日),获取了相关文章,并查阅了参考文献列表以寻找其他参考文献。
用表格总结研究细节。将选定的早期参考文献和支持性文献纳入综合内容以提供背景信息。
襁褓包裹法能使婴儿安静并促进睡眠,但在缓解疼痛方面,其效果与其他非药物方法相当或更差。仰卧襁褓包裹法可能与婴儿猝死综合征存在轻微风险,尽管混杂变量的影响尚不清楚。早期皮肤接触有助于早期母乳喂养,但襁褓包裹法对长期母乳喂养没有负面影响。臀部紧密包裹襁褓与髋关节发育不良密切相关。关于襁褓包裹法对足月儿疼痛、婴儿生命体征、觉醒阈值以及襁褓包裹法与维生素D缺乏和急性下呼吸道感染之间可能存在的关联的影响,还需要更多研究。
研究数量较少,随机对照试验很少,且研究人员对襁褓包裹法的定义不同。
如果采取一些预防措施,如牢固包裹以尽量减少松开的风险、避免过热、让婴儿仰卧睡觉以及当婴儿首次出现翻身迹象时停止包裹,襁褓包裹法的风险极小。
产科和新生儿护士应根据证据示范襁褓包裹法的操作,并促进婴儿护理人员做出明智的决策。