Frank Jens, Eklund Ann
Grimsö Wildlife Research Station, Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Riddarhyttan, Sweden.
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 10;12(4):e0175211. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175211. eCollection 2017.
Large carnivore conservation may be considered as successful in Sweden, as wolf (Canis lupus), lynx (Lynx lynx), brown bear (Ursus arctos), golden eagles (Aquila chrysaetos), and wolverine (Gulo gulo) populations have recovered from extinction or near extinction to viable populations during the last three decades. Particularly the wolf and lynx populations have returned at the cost of an increasing number of carnivore attacks on domestic livestock. To support coexistence between carnivores and livestock production, the Swedish authorities subsidise interventions to prevent or reduce the number of carnivore attacks. The most commonly used intervention is carnivore deterring fencing, and all livestock owners can apply for subsidies to build a fence. To receive reimbursement the fence must be approved by the authorities according to predefined criteria. An important part of any management aiming to be adaptive is evaluating interventions. In this paper we evaluate to what extent previously subsidised fences still meet the criteria 1-15 years after their approval. Of 296 fences that had received subsidies in the county of Värmland, 100 randomly selected fences were revisited in 2016. From this subsample 14% of the fences still met the initial criteria for subsidies. None of the fences that still fulfilled the criteria were more than 8 years old, whereas fences with identified failures occurred in all age groups. Of the 86 fences that failed to meet the criteria, construction failures were the most commonly occurring problem. Maintenance failures, wear and tear, only explain a minor part of the failures. To improve the quality of fencing, as well as the quality and longevity of the subsidies programme, there is a need for improved communication between authorities, and improved communication and support from the authorities to livestock producers before and during construction of fences, as well as more rigorous inspection when the fences are built.
在瑞典,大型食肉动物保护可被视为成功的,因为在过去三十年里,狼(犬属灰狼)、猞猁(欧亚猞猁)、棕熊(棕熊)、金雕(金雕)和 Wolverine(貂熊)种群已从灭绝或近乎灭绝恢复到可存活种群。特别是狼和猞猁种群的回归是以食肉动物对家畜的攻击数量不断增加为代价的。为了支持食肉动物与畜牧生产之间的共存,瑞典当局对预防或减少食肉动物攻击的干预措施提供补贴。最常用的干预措施是设置阻止食肉动物的围栏,所有家畜所有者都可以申请补贴来建造围栏。为了获得报销,围栏必须根据预先确定的标准得到当局的批准。任何旨在适应性管理的重要部分都是评估干预措施。在本文中,我们评估了先前获得补贴的围栏在批准后的 1 - 15 年内仍符合标准的程度。在韦姆兰县获得补贴的 296 个围栏中,2016 年随机挑选了 100 个围栏进行复查。在这个子样本中,14%的围栏仍符合补贴的初始标准。仍符合标准的围栏没有超过 8 年的,而在所有年龄组中都出现了被认定有故障的围栏。在 86 个不符合标准的围栏中,建造故障是最常见的问题。维护故障、磨损,只能解释一小部分故障。为了提高围栏的质量以及补贴计划的质量和持久性,当局之间需要改善沟通,并且在围栏建造之前和期间,当局需要改善与家畜生产者的沟通并提供支持,同时在建造围栏时进行更严格的检查。