Martins Catia, Aschehoug Irina, Ludviksen Marit, Holst Jens, Finlayson Graham, Wisloff Ulrik, Morgan Linda, King Neil, Kulseng Bård
1Obesity Research Group at Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, NORWAY; 2Center for Obesity, Department of Surgery, St. Olav Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, NORWAY; 3NNF Center for basic Metabolic Research and Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DENMARK; 4BioPsychology Group, Institute of Psychological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UNITED KINGDOM; 5K.G. Jebsen Center for Exercise in Medicine at Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, NORWAY; 6School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, Queensland, AUSTRALIA; 7School of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UNITED KINGDOM; and 8Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, AUSTRALIA.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017 Sep;49(9):1851-1858. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001296.
Studies on the effect of chronic interval training on appetite in the obese population are scarce. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of 12 wk of isocaloric programs of moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT), high-intensity interval training (HIIT), or short-duration HIIT on subjective feelings of appetite, appetite-related hormones, and reward value of food in sedentary obese individuals.
Forty-six sedentary obese individuals (30 women and 16 men), with a body mass index of 33.3 ± 2.9 kg·m and age of 34.4 ± 8.8 yr, were randomly assigned to one of the three training groups: MICT (n = 14), HIIT (n = 16), or short-duration HIIT (n = 16). Exercise was performed three times per week for 12 wk. Subjective feelings of appetite and plasma levels of acylated ghrelin, polypeptide YY3-36, and glucagon-like peptide 1 were measured before and after a standard breakfast (every 30 min up to 3 h), before and after the exercise intervention. Fat and sweet taste preferences and food reward were measured using the Leeds Food Preference Questionnaire.
A significant increase in fasting and postprandial feelings of hunger was observed with the exercise intervention (P = 0.01 and P = 0.048, respectively), but no effect of group and no interaction. No significant effect of exercise intervention, group, or interaction was found on fasting or postprandial subjective feelings of fullness, desire to eat, and prospective food consumption or plasma concentration of acylated ghrelin, polypeptide YY3-36, and glucagon-like peptide 1. No changes in food preference or reward over time, differences between groups, or interactions were found.
This study suggests that chronic HIIT has no independent effect on appetite or food reward when compared with an isocaloric program of MICT in obese individuals.
关于慢性间歇训练对肥胖人群食欲影响的研究较少。本研究的目的是确定为期12周的等热量中等强度持续训练(MICT)、高强度间歇训练(HIIT)或短时长HIIT方案对久坐不动的肥胖个体的主观食欲感受、食欲相关激素以及食物奖励值的影响。
46名久坐不动的肥胖个体(30名女性和16名男性),体重指数为33.3±2.9kg·m²,年龄为34.4±8.8岁,被随机分配到三个训练组之一:MICT组(n = 14)、HIIT组(n = 16)或短时长HIIT组(n = 16)。每周进行3次运动,共12周。在标准早餐前后(每30分钟直至3小时)以及运动干预前后,测量主观食欲感受以及酰基化胃饥饿素、酪酪肽(多肽YY3 - 36)和胰高血糖素样肽1的血浆水平。使用利兹食物偏好问卷测量脂肪和甜味偏好以及食物奖励。
运动干预后观察到空腹和餐后饥饿感显著增加(分别为P = 0.01和P = 0.048),但组间无影响且无交互作用。在空腹或餐后饱腹感、进食欲望、预期食物摄入量或酰基化胃饥饿素、酪酪肽和胰高血糖素样肽1的血浆浓度方面,未发现运动干预、组间或交互作用有显著影响。未发现食物偏好或奖励随时间、组间差异或交互作用有变化。
本研究表明,与肥胖个体的等热量MICT方案相比,慢性HIIT对食欲或食物奖励无独立影响。