Price Lynndi M, Hinton Elizabeth
1School of Nursing, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, United States 2Rowland Medical Library, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, United States 3UMMC School of Nursing Evidence Based Practice and Research Team: a Joanna Briggs Institute Affiliated Group, Jackson, Mississippi, United States 4The Center for Translational Research: a Joanna Briggs Institute Center of Excellence, Fort Worth, Texas, United States.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Apr;15(4):905-913. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003116.
The objective of this review is to compare International Normalized Ratio (INR) monitoring adherence in two different settings: the outpatient INR clinic and the patient's home or residence. The review seeks to identify non-adherence trends in both settings to help providers determine which setting is best for patients on warfarin to improve INR monitoring adherence. Improved INR monitoring adherence correlates with maintaining routine INR testing.Specifically, the review question is what is the effect of home point-of-care INR monitoring compared to clinic monitoring on INR monitoring adherence in adults taking oral anticoagulant medications?
本综述的目的是比较国际标准化比值(INR)监测在两种不同环境下的依从性:门诊INR诊所和患者家中或住所。该综述旨在确定两种环境下的不依从趋势,以帮助医疗服务提供者确定哪种环境最适合服用华法林的患者,以提高INR监测的依从性。改善INR监测依从性与维持常规INR检测相关。具体而言,综述问题是与诊所监测相比,家庭即时检测INR对服用口服抗凝药物的成年人的INR监测依从性有何影响?