Department of Urology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Department of Urology, Yidu Central Hospital of Weifang City, Weifang, Shandong, China.
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Jul;27(13-14):2583-2589. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13854. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
To assess the effects of three different bowel preparation methods on the incidence of infectious complications in patients who underwent transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy.
The standard bowel preparation protocol for prostate biopsy has not been established.
A retrospective study in a single centre.
From January 2013-December 2015, the clinical records of 1,130 patients who underwent prostate biopsy were, respectively, reviewed. All the patients received metronidazole prophylaxis before biopsy. The patients were divided into three groups according to the bowel preparation methods: patients in Group A (n = 402) received only soapy enema; patients in Group B (n = 413) received polyethylene glycol; while patients in Group C (n = 315) received polyethylene glycol plus povidone-iodine enema. Infectious complications were classified as fever (>37.5°C), urinary tract infection and sepsis. The postoperative adverse events were also observed.
The overall postbiopsy infectious complications were observed in 48 (4.25%) patients of all the cases, including 23 (5.72%) cases in Group A, 20 (4.84%) cases in Group B and five patients (1.59%) in Group C. There was significant difference among the groups (p = .018). In detail, these infectious complications included 22 (1.95%) cases of fever and 26 (2.30%) cases of urinary tract infection. No sepsis was observed among the total patients. The incidence of adverse events was 14.43% (58/402) occurred in Group A, 25.91% (107/413) in Group B and 26.67% (84/315) in Group C. The difference was statistically significant.
Our study confirmed that combined preparation regimens of polyethylene glycol with povidone-iodine enema could significantly reduce the postbiopsy infection rate. Conventional soapy enema is associated with less adverse events.
Findings of this study provide useful evidence-based information for healthcare professionals. The application of combined preparation regimens of polyethylene glycol with povidone-iodine enema resulted in better improvement in the prevention of postbiopsy infection.
评估三种不同肠道准备方法对经直肠超声引导前列腺活检患者感染并发症发生率的影响。
前列腺活检的标准肠道准备方案尚未确定。
单中心回顾性研究。
2013 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月,回顾分析了 1130 例接受前列腺活检的患者的临床资料。所有患者在活检前均接受甲硝唑预防。根据肠道准备方法将患者分为三组:A 组(n=402)仅接受肥皂灌肠;B 组(n=413)接受聚乙二醇;C 组(n=315)接受聚乙二醇加碘伏灌肠。感染性并发症分为发热(>37.5°C)、尿路感染和败血症。观察术后不良事件。
所有病例中,术后感染并发症 48 例(4.25%),A 组 23 例(5.72%),B 组 20 例(4.84%),C 组 5 例(1.59%)。三组间差异有统计学意义(p=0.018)。具体而言,这些感染性并发症包括发热 22 例(1.95%)和尿路感染 26 例(2.30%)。所有患者均无败血症。A 组不良事件发生率为 14.43%(58/402),B 组为 25.91%(107/413),C 组为 26.67%(84/315)。差异有统计学意义。
本研究证实,聚乙二醇联合碘伏灌肠的联合准备方案可显著降低活检后感染率。常规肥皂灌肠与较少的不良事件相关。
本研究结果为医疗保健专业人员提供了有用的循证信息。聚乙二醇联合碘伏灌肠联合准备方案的应用可更好地改善活检后感染的预防。