Suppr超能文献

牙槽突和根折的诊断:CBCT 影像与根尖片比较的体外研究。

Diagnosis of alveolar and root fractures: an in vitro study comparing CBCT imaging with periapical radiographs.

机构信息

Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Odontologia, Departamento de Estomatologia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

出版信息

J Appl Oral Sci. 2017 Mar-Apr;25(2):227-233. doi: 10.1590/1678-77572016-0332.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare periapical radiograph (PR) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in the diagnosis of alveolar and root fractures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Sixty incisor teeth (20 higid and 40 with root fracture) from dogs were inserted in 60 anterior alveolar sockets (40 higid and 20 with alveolar fracture) of 15 macerated canine maxillae. Each fractured socket had a root fractured tooth inserted in it. Afterwards, each maxilla was submitted to PR in two different vertical angulation incidences, and to CBCT imaging with a small field of view (FOV) and high-definition protocol. Images were randomized and posteriorly analyzed by two oral and maxillofacial radiologists two times, with a two-week interval between observations.

RESULTS

Sensitivity and specificity values were good for root fractures for PR and CBCT. For alveolar fractures, sensitivity ranged from 0.10 to 0.90 for PR and from 0.50 to 0.65 for CBCT. Specificity for alveolar fractures showed lower results than for root fractures for PR and CBCT. Areas under the ROC curve showed good results for both PR and CBCT for root fractures. However, results were fair for both PR and CBCT for alveolar fractures. When submitted to repeated measures ANOVA tests, there was a statistically significant difference between PR and CBCT for root fractures. Root fracture intraobserver agreement ranged from 0.90 to 0.93, and alveolar fracture intraobserver agreement ranged from 0.30 to 0.57. Interobserver agreement results were substantial for root fractures and poor/fair for alveolar fractures (0.11 for PR and 0.30 for CBCT).

CONCLUSION

Periapical radiograph with two different vertical angulations may be considered an accurate method to detect root fractures. However, PR showed poorer results than CBCT for the diagnosis of alveolar fractures. When no fractures are diagnosed in PR and the patient describes pain symptoms, the subsequent exam of choice is CBCT.

摘要

目的

比较根尖片(PR)和锥形束 CT(CBCT)在诊断牙槽突和根折中的作用。

材料和方法

将 60 颗犬切牙(20 颗完整和 40 颗根折)插入 15 个犬上颌前牙槽窝(40 个完整和 20 个牙槽突骨折)中。每个骨折牙槽窝中都插入了一颗根折的牙齿。之后,每个上颌骨都分别进行了两种不同垂直角度的 PR 拍摄,并进行了小视野(FOV)和高清协议的 CBCT 成像。图像被随机化,由两名口腔颌面放射科医生进行两次分析,两次观察之间间隔两周。

结果

PR 和 CBCT 对根折的敏感性和特异性均较好。对于牙槽突骨折,PR 的敏感性范围为 0.10 至 0.90,而 CBCT 的敏感性范围为 0.50 至 0.65。PR 和 CBCT 对牙槽突骨折的特异性均低于根折。ROC 曲线下面积显示 PR 和 CBCT 对根折的结果均较好。然而,PR 和 CBCT 对牙槽突骨折的结果均为一般。当进行重复测量方差分析时,PR 和 CBCT 对根折的结果有统计学意义。根折的观察者内一致性范围为 0.90 至 0.93,牙槽突骨折的观察者内一致性范围为 0.30 至 0.57。根折的观察者间一致性结果为高度一致,而牙槽突骨折的观察者间一致性结果为低/一般(PR 为 0.11,CBCT 为 0.30)。

结论

两种不同垂直角度的根尖片可能被认为是检测根折的准确方法。然而,PR 对牙槽突骨折的诊断结果不如 CBCT。如果 PR 未诊断出骨折,且患者描述有疼痛症状,则后续的首选检查是 CBCT。

相似文献

1
Diagnosis of alveolar and root fractures: an in vitro study comparing CBCT imaging with periapical radiographs.
J Appl Oral Sci. 2017 Mar-Apr;25(2):227-233. doi: 10.1590/1678-77572016-0332.
2
Diagnosis of alveolar and root fractures in macerated canine maxillae: a comparison between two different CBCT protocols.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2017 Aug;46(6):20170037. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20170037. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
4
Vertical root fracture detection with cone-beam computed tomography in Biodentine™ filled teeth.
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Oct 4;24(1):1178. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04947-7.
7
Detection of Simulated Vertical Root Fractures: Which Cone-beam Computed Tomographic System Is the Most Accurate?
J Endod. 2016 Jun;42(6):972-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.03.013. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
10
Radiographic diagnosis of root fractures: a systematic review, meta-analyses and sources of heterogeneity.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2017 Dec;46(8):20170400. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20170400. Epub 2017 Nov 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Splinting in horizontal root fractures: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 26;20(6):e0326979. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326979. eCollection 2025.
2
Developing evidence-based clinical imaging guidelines for the diagnosis of vertically fractured teeth.
Oral Radiol. 2024 Oct;40(4):471-483. doi: 10.1007/s11282-024-00766-2. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
3
Detecting Mandible Fractures in CBCT Scans Using a 3-Stage Neural Network.
J Dent Res. 2024 Dec;103(13):1384-1391. doi: 10.1177/00220345241256618. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
6
A perspective on the diagnosis of cracked tooth: imaging modalities evolve to AI-based analysis.
Biomed Eng Online. 2022 Jun 15;21(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12938-022-01008-4.
8
Accuracy of three cone-beam CT devices and two software systems in the detection of vertical root fractures.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2021 Mar 1;50(3):20200334. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20200334. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
9
Evaluation Algorithm of Root Canal Shape Based on Steklov Spectrum Analysis.
Comput Math Methods Med. 2019 Nov 3;2019:4830914. doi: 10.1155/2019/4830914. eCollection 2019.
10
Evaluation of an artificial intelligence system for detecting vertical root fracture on panoramic radiography.
Oral Radiol. 2020 Oct;36(4):337-343. doi: 10.1007/s11282-019-00409-x. Epub 2019 Sep 18.

本文引用的文献

2
Cone-beam Computed Tomography for Detecting Vertical Root Fractures in Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Systematic Review.
J Endod. 2016 Feb;42(2):177-85. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.10.005. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
5
Multidisciplinary approach for the treatment of horizontal root-fractured maxillary anterior teeth.
Case Rep Dent. 2014;2014:472759. doi: 10.1155/2014/472759. Epub 2014 Nov 17.
6
Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiography in apical periodontitis diagnosis.
J Endod. 2014 Dec;40(12):2057-60. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.09.003. Epub 2014 Oct 11.
7
Influence of cone-beam computed tomographic scan mode for detection of horizontal root fracture.
J Endod. 2014 Sep;40(9):1472-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Apr 26.
9
Dentoalveolar trauma.
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2013 Oct;46(5):807-23. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2013.06.009.
10
Office-based management of dental alveolar trauma.
Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2013 Sep;21(2):185-97. doi: 10.1016/j.cxom.2013.05.005.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验