• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

增进我们对精神障碍建模的理解:一项系统评价与荟萃分析方案

Improving our understanding of the modelling of psychotic disorders: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Bahor Zsanett, Nunes-Fonseca Cristina, Thomson Lindsay D G, Sena Emily S, Macleod Malcolm R

机构信息

Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK.

Division of Psychiatry University of Edinburgh, Royal Edinburgh Hospital Edinburgh UK.

出版信息

Evid Based Preclin Med. 2016 Dec;3(2):e00022. doi: 10.1002/ebm2.22. Epub 2017 Mar 17.

DOI:10.1002/ebm2.22
PMID:28405408
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5367269/
Abstract

Psychosis represents a set of symptoms against which current available treatments are not universally effective and are often accompanied by adverse side effects. Clinical management could potentially be improved with a greater understanding of the underlying biology and subsequently with the introduction of novel treatments. Since many clinical drug candidates are identified through modelling, a deeper understanding of the pre-clinical field, might help us understand why translation of results from animal models to inform mental health clinical practice has so far been weak. We set out to give a shallow, but broad unbiased overview of experiments looking at the modelling of psychotic disorders using a systematic review and meta-analysis. This protocol describes the exact methodology we propose to follow in order to quantitatively review both studies characterizing a model and those experiments that investigate the effects of novel therapeutic options. We are interested in assessing the prevalence of the reporting of measures to reduce risk of bias, and the internal and external validity of the animal models and outcome measures used to validate these models. This generation of strong empirical evidence has the potential to identify areas for improvement, make suggestions for future research avenues, and ultimately inform what we think we know to improve the current attrition rate between bench and bedside in psychosis research. A review like this will also support the reduction of animal numbers used in research and the refinement of experiments to maximize their value in informing the field.

摘要

精神病表现出一系列症状,目前可用的治疗方法对其并非普遍有效,且常常伴有不良副作用。若能更深入地了解潜在生物学机制,并随后引入新的治疗方法,临床管理可能会得到改善。由于许多临床候选药物是通过建模确定的,因此更深入地了解临床前领域,可能有助于我们理解为何迄今为止,将动物模型的结果转化为心理健康临床实践的情况一直很薄弱。我们着手通过系统综述和荟萃分析,对研究精神障碍建模的实验进行一个浅显但全面且无偏倚的概述。本方案描述了我们提议遵循的具体方法,以便对描述模型的研究以及那些研究新型治疗选择效果的实验进行定量综述。我们感兴趣的是评估减少偏倚风险措施报告的普遍性,以及用于验证这些模型的动物模型和结果测量的内部和外部有效性。这一强有力的实证证据的产生,有可能确定改进领域,为未来的研究途径提出建议,并最终告知我们如何改进精神病研究中从实验室到临床的当前损耗率。这样的综述也将支持减少研究中使用的动物数量,并优化实验以最大限度地提高其在为该领域提供信息方面的价值。

相似文献

1
Improving our understanding of the modelling of psychotic disorders: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.增进我们对精神障碍建模的理解:一项系统评价与荟萃分析方案
Evid Based Preclin Med. 2016 Dec;3(2):e00022. doi: 10.1002/ebm2.22. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Qualitative Study定性研究
5
Right care, first time: a highly personalised and measurement-based care model to manage youth mental health.精准医疗,首次就诊:高度个性化和基于评估的青少年心理健康管理医疗模式。
Med J Aust. 2019 Nov;211 Suppl 9:S3-S46. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50383.
6
Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review.改善物质使用障碍康复期学生行为和学业成果的康复学校:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 4;14(1):1-86. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.9. eCollection 2018.
7
Trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) agonism for psychosis: a living systematic review and meta-analysis of human and non-human data.用于治疗精神病的痕量胺相关受体1(TAAR1)激动剂:对人类和非人类数据的实时系统评价和荟萃分析。
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Apr 11;9:182. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.21302.1. eCollection 2024.
8
9
Triangulating evidence from the GALENOS living systematic review on trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) agonists in psychosis.对盖伦诺斯关于精神病中痕量胺相关受体1(TAAR1)激动剂的循证医学系统评价的证据进行三角互证。
Br J Psychiatry. 2025 Mar;226(3):162-170. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2024.237. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
10
Letter to the Editor: CONVERGENCES AND DIVERGENCES IN THE ICD-11 VS. DSM-5 CLASSIFICATION OF MOOD DISORDERS.给编辑的信:《ICD-11 与 DSM-5 心境障碍分类的趋同与分歧》
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2021;32(4):293-295. doi: 10.5080/u26899.

引用本文的文献

1
Muscarinic receptor agonists and positive allosteric modulators in animal models of psychosis: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.毒蕈碱受体激动剂和正变构调节剂在精神病动物模型中的应用:系统评价与荟萃分析方案
F1000Res. 2025 Jan 2;13:1017. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.155356.2. eCollection 2024.
2
Trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) agonism for psychosis: a living systematic review and meta-analysis of human and non-human data.用于治疗精神病的痕量胺相关受体1(TAAR1)激动剂:对人类和非人类数据的实时系统评价和荟萃分析。
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Apr 11;9:182. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.21302.1. eCollection 2024.
3
Trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) agonists for psychosis: protocol for a living systematic review and meta-analysis of human and non-human studies.用于治疗精神病的痕量胺相关受体1(TAAR1)激动剂:人类和非人类研究的实时系统评价与荟萃分析方案
Wellcome Open Res. 2023 Aug 25;8:365. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.19866.1. eCollection 2023.
4
The Automated Systematic Search Deduplicator (ASySD): a rapid, open-source, interoperable tool to remove duplicate citations in biomedical systematic reviews.自动化系统搜索去重器 (ASySD):一种快速、开源、可互操作的工具,用于去除生物医学系统评价中的重复引文。
BMC Biol. 2023 Sep 7;21(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12915-023-01686-z.
5
Technological advances in preclinical meta-research.临床前元研究中的技术进步。
BMJ Open Sci. 2021 Jul 25;5(1):e100131. doi: 10.1136/bmjos-2020-100131. eCollection 2021.
6
Development and uptake of an online systematic review platform: the early years of the CAMARADES Systematic Review Facility (SyRF).一个在线系统评价平台的开发与应用:CAMARADES系统评价工具(SyRF)的早期阶段
BMJ Open Sci. 2021 Mar 30;5(1):e100103. doi: 10.1136/bmjos-2020-100103. eCollection 2021.
7
Risk of bias assessment in preclinical literature using natural language processing.基于自然语言处理的临床前文献偏倚风险评估。
Res Synth Methods. 2022 May;13(3):368-380. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1533. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
8
Machine learning algorithms for systematic review: reducing workload in a preclinical review of animal studies and reducing human screening error.机器学习算法在系统评价中的应用:减少动物研究临床前评价中的工作量和减少人为筛选错误。
Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 15;8(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-0942-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Meta-analysis of data from animal studies: a practical guide.动物研究数据的荟萃分析:实用指南。
J Neurosci Methods. 2014 Jan 15;221:92-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.09.010. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
2
From antipsychotic to anti-schizophrenia drugs: role of animal models.从抗精神病药到抗精神分裂症药物:动物模型的作用。
Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2012 Oct;33(10):515-21. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2012.06.006. Epub 2012 Jul 16.
3
Incidence of schizophrenia and other psychoses in England, 1950-2009: a systematic review and meta-analyses.1950-2009 年英格兰的精神分裂症和其他精神病发病率:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e31660. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031660. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
4
Animal models of schizophrenia.精神分裂症的动物模型。
Br J Pharmacol. 2011 Oct;164(4):1162-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01386.x.
5
Animal models of neuropsychiatric disorders.神经精神疾病的动物模型。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2011;7:39-61. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032210-104454.
6
Past and present progress in the pharmacologic treatment of schizophrenia.精神分裂症的药物治疗:过去与现在的进展。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2010 Sep;71(9):1115-24. doi: 10.4088/JCP.10r06264yel.
7
Publication bias in reports of animal stroke studies leads to major overstatement of efficacy.动物中风研究报告中的发表偏倚导致疗效的严重夸大。
PLoS Biol. 2010 Mar 30;8(3):e1000344. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000344.
8
Can animal models of disease reliably inform human studies?疾病的动物模型能可靠地为人类研究提供信息吗?
PLoS Med. 2010 Mar 30;7(3):e1000245. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000245.
9
Schizophrenia.精神分裂症
Lancet. 2009 Aug 22;374(9690):635-45. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60995-8.
10
Treatments for schizophrenia: a critical review of pharmacology and mechanisms of action of antipsychotic drugs.精神分裂症的治疗:抗精神病药物药理学及作用机制的批判性综述
Mol Psychiatry. 2005 Jan;10(1):79-104. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4001556.