Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Heart Center Lübeck, Medical Clinic II, Lübeck, Germany; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Heart Center Lübeck, Medical Clinic II, Lübeck, Germany; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Apr 18;69(15):1913-1920. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.02.027.
Mortality in cardiogenic shock (CS) remains high. Early risk stratification is crucial to make adequate treatment decisions.
This study sought to develop an easy-to-use, readily available risk prediction score for short-term mortality in patients with CS, derived from the IABP-SHOCK II (Intraaortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock) trial.
The score was developed using a stepwise multivariable regression analysis.
Six variables emerged as independent predictors for 30-day mortality and were used as score parameters: age >73 years, prior stroke, glucose at admission >10.6 mmol/l (191 mg/dl), creatinine at admission >132.6 μmol/l (1.5 mg/dl), Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow grade <3 after percutaneous coronary intervention, and arterial blood lactate at admission >5 mmol/l. Either 1 or 2 points were attributed to each variable, leading to a score in 3 risk categories: low (0 to 2), intermediate (3 or 4), and high (5 to 9). The observed 30-day mortality rates were 23.8%, 49.2%, and 76.6%, respectively (p < 0.0001). Validation in the IABP-SHOCK II registry population showed good discrimination with an area under the curve of 0.79. External validation in the CardShock trial population (n = 137) showed short-term mortality rates of 28.0% (score 0 to 2), 42.9% (score 3 to 4), and 77.3% (score 5 to 9; p < 0.001) and an area under the curve of 0.73. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a stepwise increase in mortality between the different score categories (0 to 2 vs. 3 to 4: p = 0.04; 0 to 2 vs. 5 to 9: p = 0.008).
The IABP-SHOCK II risk score can be easily calculated in daily clinical practice and strongly correlated with mortality in patients with infarct-related CS. It may help stratify patient risk for short-term mortality and might, thus, facilitate clinical decision making. (Intraaortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock II [IABP-SHOCK II]; NCT00491036).
心源性休克(CS)患者的死亡率仍然很高。早期风险分层对于做出适当的治疗决策至关重要。
本研究旨在开发一种简单易用、易于获得的 CS 患者短期死亡率风险预测评分,该评分源自 IABP-SHOCK II(主动脉内球囊泵在心源性休克中的应用)试验。
使用逐步多变量回归分析来开发该评分。
6 个变量成为 30 天死亡率的独立预测因素,并被用作评分参数:年龄>73 岁、既往卒中、入院时血糖>10.6mmol/L(191mg/dl)、入院时肌酐>132.6μmol/L(1.5mg/dl)、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后血栓溶解心肌梗死血流分级<3 级、以及入院时动脉血乳酸>5mmol/L。每个变量赋予 1 或 2 分,导致分为 3 个风险类别:低(0 至 2)、中(3 或 4)和高(5 至 9)。观察到的 30 天死亡率分别为 23.8%、49.2%和 76.6%(p<0.0001)。在 IABP-SHOCK II 注册研究人群中的验证显示,曲线下面积为 0.79,具有良好的区分度。在 CardShock 试验人群(n=137)中的外部验证显示,短期死亡率分别为 28.0%(评分 0 至 2)、42.9%(评分 3 至 4)和 77.3%(评分 5 至 9;p<0.001),曲线下面积为 0.73。Kaplan-Meier 分析显示,不同评分类别之间死亡率呈逐步增加(0 至 2 与 3 至 4:p=0.04;0 至 2 与 5 至 9:p=0.008)。
IABP-SHOCK II 风险评分可在日常临床实践中轻松计算,与梗死相关 CS 患者的死亡率密切相关。它可能有助于对短期死亡率进行患者风险分层,并因此有助于临床决策。(主动脉内球囊泵在心源性休克 II [IABP-SHOCK II];NCT00491036)。