Suppr超能文献

心肌梗死后心源性休克患者的风险分层。

Risk Stratification for Patients in Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Heart Center Lübeck, Medical Clinic II, Lübeck, Germany; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.

Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Heart Center Lübeck, Medical Clinic II, Lübeck, Germany; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Apr 18;69(15):1913-1920. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.02.027.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mortality in cardiogenic shock (CS) remains high. Early risk stratification is crucial to make adequate treatment decisions.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to develop an easy-to-use, readily available risk prediction score for short-term mortality in patients with CS, derived from the IABP-SHOCK II (Intraaortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock) trial.

METHODS

The score was developed using a stepwise multivariable regression analysis.

RESULTS

Six variables emerged as independent predictors for 30-day mortality and were used as score parameters: age >73 years, prior stroke, glucose at admission >10.6 mmol/l (191 mg/dl), creatinine at admission >132.6 μmol/l (1.5 mg/dl), Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow grade <3 after percutaneous coronary intervention, and arterial blood lactate at admission >5 mmol/l. Either 1 or 2 points were attributed to each variable, leading to a score in 3 risk categories: low (0 to 2), intermediate (3 or 4), and high (5 to 9). The observed 30-day mortality rates were 23.8%, 49.2%, and 76.6%, respectively (p < 0.0001). Validation in the IABP-SHOCK II registry population showed good discrimination with an area under the curve of 0.79. External validation in the CardShock trial population (n = 137) showed short-term mortality rates of 28.0% (score 0 to 2), 42.9% (score 3 to 4), and 77.3% (score 5 to 9; p < 0.001) and an area under the curve of 0.73. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a stepwise increase in mortality between the different score categories (0 to 2 vs. 3 to 4: p = 0.04; 0 to 2 vs. 5 to 9: p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

The IABP-SHOCK II risk score can be easily calculated in daily clinical practice and strongly correlated with mortality in patients with infarct-related CS. It may help stratify patient risk for short-term mortality and might, thus, facilitate clinical decision making. (Intraaortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock II [IABP-SHOCK II]; NCT00491036).

摘要

背景

心源性休克(CS)患者的死亡率仍然很高。早期风险分层对于做出适当的治疗决策至关重要。

目的

本研究旨在开发一种简单易用、易于获得的 CS 患者短期死亡率风险预测评分,该评分源自 IABP-SHOCK II(主动脉内球囊泵在心源性休克中的应用)试验。

方法

使用逐步多变量回归分析来开发该评分。

结果

6 个变量成为 30 天死亡率的独立预测因素,并被用作评分参数:年龄>73 岁、既往卒中、入院时血糖>10.6mmol/L(191mg/dl)、入院时肌酐>132.6μmol/L(1.5mg/dl)、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后血栓溶解心肌梗死血流分级<3 级、以及入院时动脉血乳酸>5mmol/L。每个变量赋予 1 或 2 分,导致分为 3 个风险类别:低(0 至 2)、中(3 或 4)和高(5 至 9)。观察到的 30 天死亡率分别为 23.8%、49.2%和 76.6%(p<0.0001)。在 IABP-SHOCK II 注册研究人群中的验证显示,曲线下面积为 0.79,具有良好的区分度。在 CardShock 试验人群(n=137)中的外部验证显示,短期死亡率分别为 28.0%(评分 0 至 2)、42.9%(评分 3 至 4)和 77.3%(评分 5 至 9;p<0.001),曲线下面积为 0.73。Kaplan-Meier 分析显示,不同评分类别之间死亡率呈逐步增加(0 至 2 与 3 至 4:p=0.04;0 至 2 与 5 至 9:p=0.008)。

结论

IABP-SHOCK II 风险评分可在日常临床实践中轻松计算,与梗死相关 CS 患者的死亡率密切相关。它可能有助于对短期死亡率进行患者风险分层,并因此有助于临床决策。(主动脉内球囊泵在心源性休克 II [IABP-SHOCK II];NCT00491036)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验