Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Rd., Shanghai, 200032, China.
Surg Endosc. 2017 Nov;31(11):4780-4789. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5555-4. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) has been widely promoted in recent years as a safe and effective treatment for choledocholithiasis. However, there are no standard guidelines for the treatment of patients who have concomitant hepatolithiasis of the left liver and abdominal adhesions. The aim of the current research was to compare the outcomes of open versus laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with left hepatectomy (OCBDH vs. LCBDH) in patients with choledocholithiasis concomitant with left-sided hepatolithiasis, and to evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for choledocholithiasis in patients with abdominal adhesions.
Between October 2012 and October 2015, a total of 321 consecutive patients with choledocholithiasis underwent surgical treatment. LCBDE was performed in 107 patients, and open common bile duct exploration (OCBDE) was performed in 111 patients. Further, 31 patients and 72 patients underwent LCBDH and OCBDH, respectively. A total of 133 patients who underwent LCBDE or OCBDE had abdominal adhesions, which were classified as mild, moderate, or severe according to an abdominal adhesion scoring system, which was validated in the LCBDE group and OCBDE group. The perioperative results were reviewed and analyzed retrospectively.
In the mild adhesion group, blood loss, postoperative recovery in the LCBDE group was lesser than those in the OCBDE group. In the moderate adhesion group, the postoperative recovery was significantly shorter in the LCBDE group than in the OCBDE group. In the severe adhesion group, the operation time and blood loss in the LCBDE group were higher than those in the OCBDE group. The postoperative recovery was significantly better in the LCBDH group than in the OCBDH group.
LCBDH can obviously improve recovery and shorten the hospitalization period. Further, LCBDE is safe and feasible for patients of choledocholithiasis with mild and moderate abdominal adhesions.
腹腔镜胆总管探查术(LCBDE)近年来已广泛推广,作为治疗胆总管结石的一种安全有效的方法。然而,对于同时患有左肝内胆管结石和腹部粘连的患者,尚无标准的治疗指南。本研究旨在比较开腹与腹腔镜联合左肝切除术治疗胆总管结石合并左肝内胆管结石的疗效,并评估腹腔镜治疗合并腹部粘连的胆总管结石的安全性和可行性。
2012 年 10 月至 2015 年 10 月,共 321 例胆总管结石患者接受手术治疗。107 例行 LCBDE,111 例行开腹胆总管探查术(OCBDE)。进一步,31 例和 72 例患者分别行 LCBDH 和 OCBDH。共 133 例行 LCBDE 或 OCBDE 的患者有腹部粘连,根据腹部粘连评分系统将粘连分为轻度、中度和重度,该评分系统在 LCBDE 组和 OCBDE 组中得到验证。回顾性分析其围手术期结果。
在轻度粘连组中,LCBDE 组的出血量和术后恢复均少于 OCBDE 组。在中度粘连组中,LCBDE 组的术后恢复明显短于 OCBDE 组。在重度粘连组中,LCBDE 组的手术时间和出血量均高于 OCBDE 组。LCBDH 组的术后恢复明显优于 OCBDH 组。
LCBDH 可明显改善恢复情况并缩短住院时间。此外,对于轻、中度腹部粘连的胆总管结石患者,LCBDE 是安全可行的。