Beukes Eldré W, Allen Peter M, Manchaiah Vinaya, Baguley David M, Andersson Gerhard
Department of Vision and Hearing Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.
Vision and Eye Research Unit, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.
J Am Acad Audiol. 2017 Apr;28(4):340-351. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.16055.
Managing chronic tinnitus is challenging, and innovative ways to address the resulting health-care burden are required. Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT) for tinnitus shows promise as a cost-effective treatment option. The feasibility and effectiveness of iCBT in the United Kingdom are yet to be explored. Furthermore, it is not known if iCBT can be supported by an audiologist rather than a psychologist.
This study aimed to determine the feasibility of guided iCBT using audiological support on tinnitus distress and tinnitus-related comorbidities. Furthermore, it aimed to establish the feasibility of iCBT for tinnitus distress in the United Kingdom, by determining recruitment, attrition, and compliance rates. Finally, it aimed to identify which aspects of the protocol require refinement for subsequent clinical trials.
A single-group open trial design was implemented. This study would serve as a prerequisite study, to identify barriers, before undertaking effectiveness trials.
Participants consisted of 37 adults (18 males, 19 females), with an age range of between 50 and 59 yr. The mean preintervention tinnitus severity rating was 56.15 (standard deviation = 18.35), which is categorized as "severe tinnitus" as measured by the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI). Five participants withdrew during the study, and 29 of the remaining participants completed the postintervention questionnaire.
The guided iCBT intervention ran over an eight-week period and consisted of 16 obligatory modules and five optional modules. The intervention was designed to be interactive, interesting, and stimulating. A key element was the provision of support from an audiologist throughout the program.
Online questionnaires were used throughout the study. These were administered at baseline and postintervention to determine attrition and compliance rates and to facilitate sample size estimates for further clinical trials. Outcome measures for tinnitus severity, hearing handicap, insomnia, cognitive functioning, hyperacusis, anxiety, depression, and life satisfaction were used to investigate the effects of iCBT with audiological support. In addition, a weekly questionnaire was incorporated to monitor change in tinnitus distress while undertaking the intervention.
Feasibility was established using an audiologist to support this guided iCBT intervention, as a significant change postintervention was found for tinnitus severity, as measured by the TFI and the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory, Screening version. The attrition rate was 22% and compliance was variable. Although these results were based on a small sample, they provide encouraging evidence for the feasibility of delivering iCBT treatment for tinnitus symptoms with audiology support in the United Kingdom.
An Internet-based intervention of tinnitus appears to be feasible in the United Kingdom when using audiological support. Randomized controlled trials to further investigate the effectiveness of iCBT for tinnitus in the United Kingdom are required.
管理慢性耳鸣具有挑战性,需要创新方法来应对由此产生的医疗负担。基于互联网的耳鸣认知行为疗法(iCBT)作为一种具有成本效益的治疗选择显示出前景。iCBT在英国的可行性和有效性尚未得到探索。此外,尚不清楚iCBT是否可以由听力学家而非心理学家提供支持。
本研究旨在确定在听力支持下进行的指导性iCBT对耳鸣困扰和耳鸣相关合并症的可行性。此外,通过确定招募、损耗和依从率,旨在确定iCBT在英国治疗耳鸣困扰的可行性。最后,旨在确定方案的哪些方面需要改进以用于后续临床试验。
采用单组开放试验设计。本研究将作为一项前置研究,在进行有效性试验之前识别障碍。
参与者包括37名成年人(18名男性,19名女性),年龄在50至59岁之间。干预前耳鸣严重程度的平均评分为56.15(标准差=18.35),根据耳鸣功能指数(TFI)测量,这被归类为“重度耳鸣”。5名参与者在研究期间退出,其余29名参与者完成了干预后的问卷调查。
指导性iCBT干预为期八周,包括16个必修模块和5个选修模块。该干预旨在具有互动性、趣味性和启发性。一个关键要素是在整个项目中由听力学家提供支持。
在整个研究过程中使用在线问卷。在基线和干预后进行问卷调查,以确定损耗和依从率,并为进一步的临床试验促进样本量估计。使用耳鸣严重程度、听力障碍、失眠、认知功能、听觉过敏、焦虑、抑郁和生活满意度的结果测量来研究在听力支持下iCBT的效果。此外,纳入了每周问卷以监测在进行干预时耳鸣困扰的变化。
使用听力学家支持这种指导性iCBT干预的可行性得以确立,因为通过TFI和耳鸣障碍量表筛查版测量,发现干预后耳鸣严重程度有显著变化。损耗率为22%,依从性各不相同。尽管这些结果基于小样本,但它们为在英国通过听力支持提供iCBT治疗耳鸣症状的可行性提供了令人鼓舞的证据。
在英国,当使用听力支持时,基于互联网的耳鸣干预似乎是可行的。需要进行随机对照试验以进一步研究iCBT在英国治疗耳鸣的有效性。