Suppr超能文献

基于互联网的认知行为疗法与面对面临床护理治疗耳鸣的疗效比较:一项随机临床试验。

Effectiveness of Guided Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy vs Face-to-Face Clinical Care for Treatment of Tinnitus: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Department of Vision and Hearing Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Lamar University, Beaumont, Texas.

出版信息

JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Dec 1;144(12):1126-1133. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2018.2238.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Accessible clinical care is not always available to individuals with distressing tinnitus. Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy has the potential to increase access to evidence-based services that manage tinnitus. Research comparing the effectiveness of this internet-based intervention with face-to-face care is required.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether an internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy intervention is at least as effective as established individualized face-to-face clinical care in reducing tinnitus distress and tinnitus-related difficulties.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A randomized, multicenter, 2-arm parallel group, noninferiority trial with 2-month follow-up was performed between October 4, 2016, and July 14, 2017. Invited to participate were 374 adults based in the United Kingdom who had been referred to their local tinnitus clinics because of bothersome tinnitus. The experimental group received the internet-based intervention online, and the active control group underwent the usual face-to-face tinnitus care at 1 of 3 UK-based National Health Service hospitals. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to either intervention using variable permuted block sizes of 4 and 6. Of 92 participants who were randomized (46 each in the experimental and control groups), 88 participants completed the assessment immediately after intervention and 74 participants completed the follow-up assessment.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomized to receive either 8 weeks of guided internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy or a mean of 2 to 3 individualized face-to-face appointments in a tinnitus clinic.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was a change in tinnitus distress (assessed by the Tinnitus Functional Index). Secondary assessment measures were included for insomnia, anxiety, depression, hearing disability, hyperacusis, cognitive failures, and satisfaction with life.

RESULTS

Of 92 patients overall, 55 (60%) were men with a mean (SD) age of 52.96 (12.07) years and mean (SD) tinnitus duration of 6.54 (9.25) years. The between-group difference in the Tinnitus Functional Index scores after intervention were 5.18 (95% CI, -4.17 to 14.53) at the initial assessment and 5.52 (95% CI, -4.60 to 15.61) at follow-up; both differences were within the noninferiority margin of 13 points for the lower 95% CI. For the secondary outcomes, only outcomes for insomnia fell outside the noninferiority margin, both after intervention and at follow-up, favoring internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This is the first trial, to our knowledge, to compare an internet-based intervention with standard individualized face-to-face care for tinnitus. It revealed that both interventions are equally effective for reducing tinnitus distress and most tinnitus-related difficulties.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02665975.

摘要

重要性

并非所有有困扰性耳鸣的个体都能获得可及的临床护理。基于互联网的认知行为疗法有可能增加获得管理耳鸣的循证服务的机会。需要比较这种基于互联网的干预与面对面护理的有效性的研究。

目的

评估基于互联网的认知行为疗法干预是否至少与既定的个体化面对面临床护理同样有效,可以减轻耳鸣困扰和与耳鸣相关的困难。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项在 2016 年 10 月 4 日至 2017 年 7 月 14 日之间进行的随机、多中心、2 臂平行组、非劣效性试验,随访 2 个月。邀请了 374 名因耳鸣而被转介到当地耳鸣诊所的英国成年人参加。实验组通过互联网接受基于互联网的干预,实验组在英国的 3 家国家卫生服务医院中的 1 家接受常规的面对面耳鸣护理。参与者以 1:1 的比例随机分配(使用 4 和 6 的可变区组大小)接受干预。在随机分配的 92 名参与者(实验组和对照组各 46 名)中,88 名参与者在干预后立即完成评估,74 名参与者完成随访评估。

干预

参与者被随机分配接受 8 周的指导基于互联网的认知行为疗法或在耳鸣诊所进行平均 2 到 3 次个体化的面对面预约。

主要结果和测量指标

主要结果是耳鸣困扰的变化(通过耳鸣功能指数评估)。次要评估措施包括失眠、焦虑、抑郁、听力障碍、听觉过敏、认知失败和生活满意度。

结果

在总共 92 名患者中,55 名(60%)为男性,平均(SD)年龄为 52.96(12.07)岁,平均(SD)耳鸣持续时间为 6.54(9.25)年。干预后 Tinnitus Functional Index 评分的组间差异为初始评估时为 5.18(95%CI,-4.17 至 14.53),随访时为 5.52(95%CI,-4.60 至 15.61);两个差异均在 13 分的较低 95%置信区间的非劣效性边界内。对于次要结局,仅失眠结局在干预后和随访时均超出非劣效性边界,均有利于基于互联网的认知行为疗法。

结论和相关性

这是我们所知的第一个比较基于互联网的干预与标准个体化面对面护理治疗耳鸣的试验。它表明,两种干预措施在减轻耳鸣困扰和大多数与耳鸣相关的困难方面同样有效。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02665975。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

7
Practical guide to sample size calculations: an introduction.样本量计算实用指南:引言
Pharm Stat. 2016 Jan-Feb;15(1):68-74. doi: 10.1002/pst.1709. Epub 2015 Nov 20.
8
Cost of care for subjective tinnitus in relation to patient satisfaction.主观性耳鸣的护理成本与患者满意度的关系。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Mar;152(3):518-23. doi: 10.1177/0194599814566179. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
10
A lexicon of assessment and outcome measures for telemental health.远程心理健康评估与结果测量词汇表。
Telemed J E Health. 2014 Mar;20(3):282-92. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2013.0357. Epub 2014 Jan 29.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验