Suppr超能文献

门诊医疗服务利用和未治疗疾病方面的水平不公平:来自1995年至2014年印度全国性调查的证据。

Horizontal inequity in outpatient care use and untreated morbidity: evidence from nationwide surveys in India between 1995 and 2014.

作者信息

Pandey Anamika, Ploubidis George B, Clarke Lynda, Dandona Lalit

机构信息

Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India.

Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

出版信息

Health Policy Plan. 2017 Sep 1;32(7):969-979. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czx016.

Abstract

Equity in healthcare has been a long-term guiding principle of health policy in India. We estimate the change in horizontal inequities in healthcare use over two decades comparing the older population (60 years or more) with the younger population (under 60 years). We used data from the nationwide healthcare surveys conducted in India by the National Sample Survey Organization in 1995-96 and 2014 with sample sizes 633 405 and 335 499, respectively. Bivariate and multivariate logit regression analyses were used to study the socioeconomic differentials in self-reported morbidity (SRM), outpatient care and untreated morbidity. Deviations in the degree to which healthcare was distributed according to need were measured by horizontal inequity index (HI). In each consumption quintile the older population had four times higher SRM and outpatient care rate than the younger population in 2014. In 1995-96, the pro-rich inequity in outpatient care was higher for the older (HI: 0.085; 95% CI: 0.066, 0.103) than the younger population (0.039; 0.034, 0.043), but by 2014 this inequity became similar. Untreated morbidity was concentrated among the poor; more so for the older (-0.320; -0.391, -0.249) than the younger (-0.176; -0.211, -0.141) population in 2014. The use of public facilities increased most in the poorest and poor quintiles; the increase was higher for the older than the younger population in the poorest (1.19 times) and poor (1.71 times) quintiles. The use of public facilities was disproportionately higher for the poor in 2014 than in 1995-96 for the older (-0.189; -0.234, -0.145 vs - 0.065; -0.129, -0.001) and the younger (-0.145; -0.175, -0.115 vs - 0.056; -0.086, -0.026) population. The older population has much higher morbidity and is often more disadvantaged in obtaining treatment. Health policy in India should pay special attention to equity in access to healthcare for the older population.

摘要

医疗保健公平性一直是印度卫生政策的长期指导原则。我们比较了老年人口(60岁及以上)和年轻人口(60岁以下),估计了二十多年来医疗保健使用方面横向不公平性的变化。我们使用了国家抽样调查组织于1995 - 1996年和2014年在印度进行的全国性医疗保健调查数据,样本量分别为633405和335499。采用双变量和多变量逻辑回归分析来研究自我报告发病率(SRM)、门诊护理和未治疗发病率方面的社会经济差异。根据需求分配医疗保健的程度偏差通过横向不公平指数(HI)来衡量。在2014年,每个消费五分位数中,老年人口的自我报告发病率和门诊护理率是年轻人口的四倍。1995 - 1996年,老年人口门诊护理方面的亲富不公平性(HI:0.085;95%置信区间:0.066,0.103)高于年轻人口(0.039;0.034,0.043),但到2014年这种不公平性变得相似。未治疗的发病率集中在贫困人口中;2014年老年人口(-0.320;-0.391,-0.249)比年轻人口(-0.176;-0.211,-0.141)更严重。最贫困和贫困五分位数中公共设施的使用增加最多;在最贫困(1.19倍)和贫困(1.71倍)五分位数中,老年人口的增加幅度高于年轻人口。2014年贫困人口使用公共设施的比例比1995 - 1996年更高,老年人口(-0.189;-0.234,-0.145对比 -0.065;-0.129,-0.001)和年轻人口(-0.145;-0.175,-0.115对比 -0.056;-0.086,-0.026)均是如此。老年人口发病率高得多,而且在获得治疗方面往往更处于不利地位。印度的卫生政策应特别关注老年人口获得医疗保健的公平性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b4b/5886081/2e33080c6c34/czx016f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验