• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于食品中大肠菌群和大肠杆菌/大肠菌群计数的定量干培养方法与传统培养基及最大可能数法的比较。

Comparison of the quantitative dry culture methods with both conventional media and most probable number method for the enumeration of coliforms and Escherichia coli/coliforms in food.

作者信息

Teramura H, Sota K, Iwasaki M, Ogihara H

机构信息

Yokohama Research Center, JNC Corporation, Yokohama, Japan.

Department of Food Bioscience and Biotechnology, College of Bioresource Science, Nihon University, Fujisawa, Japan.

出版信息

Lett Appl Microbiol. 2017 Jul;65(1):57-65. doi: 10.1111/lam.12744. Epub 2017 May 30.

DOI:10.1111/lam.12744
PMID:28419503
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Sanita-kun™ CC (coliform count) and EC (Escherichia coli/coliform count), sheet quantitative culture systems which can avoid chromogenic interference by lactase in food, were evaluated in comparison with conventional methods for these bacteria. Based on the results of inclusivity and exclusivity studies using 77 micro-organisms, sensitivity and specificity of both Sanita-kun™ met the criteria for ISO 16140. Both media were compared with deoxycholate agar, violet red bile agar, Merck Chromocult™ coliform agar (CCA), 3M Petrifilm™ CC and EC (PEC) and 3-tube MPN, as reference methods, in 100 naturally contaminated food samples. The correlation coefficients of both Sanita-kun™ for coliform detection were more than 0·95 for all comparisons. For E. coli detection, Sanita-kun™ EC was compared with CCA, PEC and MPN in 100 artificially contaminated food samples. The correlation coefficients for E. coli detection of Sanita-kun™ EC were more than 0·95 for all comparisons. There were no significant differences in all comparisons when conducting a one-way analysis of variance (anova). Both Sanita-kun™ significantly inhibited colour interference by lactase when inhibition of enzymatic staining was assessed using 40 natural cheese samples spiked with coliform. Our results demonstrated Sanita-kun™ CC and EC are suitable alternatives for the enumeration of coliforms and E. coli/coliforms, respectively, in a variety of foods, and specifically in fermented foods.

SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY

Current chromogenic media for coliforms and Escherichia coli/coliforms have enzymatic coloration due to breaking down of chromogenic substrates by food lactase. The novel sheet culture media which have film layer to avoid coloration by food lactase have been developed for enumeration of coliforms and E. coli/coliforms respectively. In this study, we demonstrated these media had comparable performance with reference methods and less interference by food lactase. These media have a possibility not only to be useful alternatives but also to contribute for accurate enumeration of these bacteria in a variety of foods, and specifically in fermented foods.

摘要

未贴标签

对Sanita-kun™ CC(大肠菌群计数)和EC(大肠杆菌/大肠菌群计数)这两种可避免食品中乳糖酶产生显色干扰的片状定量培养系统,与检测这些细菌的传统方法进行了比较评估。基于使用77种微生物进行的包容性和排他性研究结果,Sanita-kun™这两种产品的灵敏度和特异性均符合ISO 16140标准。在100份天然污染食品样本中,将这两种培养基与脱氧胆酸盐琼脂、紫红胆盐琼脂、默克Chromocult™大肠菌群琼脂(CCA)、3M Petrifilm™ CC和EC(PEC)以及3管MPN作为参考方法进行了比较。在所有比较中,Sanita-kun™两种产品检测大肠菌群的相关系数均大于0.95。对于大肠杆菌检测,在100份人工污染食品样本中,将Sanita-kun™ EC与CCA、PEC和MPN进行了比较。在所有比较中,Sanita-kun™ EC检测大肠杆菌的相关系数均大于0.95。进行单因素方差分析(anova)时,所有比较均无显著差异。当使用40份添加了大肠菌群的天然奶酪样本评估酶促染色抑制情况时,Sanita-kun™两种产品均显著抑制了乳糖酶的颜色干扰。我们的结果表明,Sanita-kun™ CC和EC分别是在各种食品,特别是发酵食品中计数大肠菌群和大肠杆菌/大肠菌群的合适替代方法。

研究的意义和影响

当前用于大肠菌群和大肠杆菌/大肠菌群的显色培养基由于食品乳糖酶分解显色底物而产生酶促显色。已开发出具有薄膜层以避免食品乳糖酶显色的新型片状培养基,分别用于计数大肠菌群和大肠杆菌/大肠菌群。在本研究中,我们证明这些培养基与参考方法具有可比的性能,且受食品乳糖酶的干扰较小。这些培养基不仅有可能成为有用的替代方法,而且有助于在各种食品,特别是发酵食品中准确计数这些细菌。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the quantitative dry culture methods with both conventional media and most probable number method for the enumeration of coliforms and Escherichia coli/coliforms in food.用于食品中大肠菌群和大肠杆菌/大肠菌群计数的定量干培养方法与传统培养基及最大可能数法的比较。
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2017 Jul;65(1):57-65. doi: 10.1111/lam.12744. Epub 2017 May 30.
2
Evaluation of Sanita-kun E. coli & coliform sheet medium for the enumeration of total coliforms and E. coli.用于总大肠菌群和大肠杆菌计数的Sanita-kun大肠杆菌和大肠菌群平板培养基的评估。
J AOAC Int. 2010 Jan-Feb;93(1):163-83.
3
Enumeration of coliforms and Escherichia coli in frozen black tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon by conventional and rapid methods.采用传统方法和快速方法对冷冻斑节对虾中的大肠菌群和大肠杆菌进行计数。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2003 Mar 15;81(2):113-21. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1605(02)00190-3.
4
Matrix Extension Study: Validation of the Compact Dry EC Method for Enumeration of Escherichia coli and non-E. coli Coliform Bacteria in Selected Foods.基质扩展研究:用于选定食品中大肠杆菌和非大肠杆菌大肠菌群计数的紧凑型干式EC方法的验证
J AOAC Int. 2016 Mar-Apr;99(2):451-60. doi: 10.5740/jaoacint.15-0268. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
5
Evaluation of the 3M™ Petrifilm™ Rapid E. coli/Coliform Count Plate for the Enumeration of E. coli and Coliforms: Collaborative Study, First Action: 2018.13.3M™ Petrifilm™ 快速大肠埃希氏菌/大肠菌群计数平板评估用于大肠埃希氏菌和大肠菌群计数:协作研究,首次行动:2018.13。
J AOAC Int. 2020 Apr 1;103(2):513-522. doi: 10.1093/jaocint/qsz013.
6
MC-Media Pad EC for Enumeration of Escherichia coli and Coliforms in a Variety of Foods.用于多种食品中大肠杆菌和大肠菌群计数的MC-媒体平板EC
J AOAC Int. 2019 Sep 1;102(5):1502-1515. doi: 10.1093/jaoac/102.5.1502.
7
Evaluation of the Sanita-kun coliforms, a dehydrated medium sheet for coliform detection. Performance-Tested Method 100402.
J AOAC Int. 2006 Mar-Apr;89(2):399-416.
8
Enumeration of total coliforms and E. coli in foods by the SimPlate coliform and E. coli color indicator method and conventional culture methods: collaborative study.
J AOAC Int. 2005 Sep-Oct;88(5):1318-33.
9
Validation of the 3M™ Petrifilm™ Coliform Count Plate for Enumeration of Coliforms in Bottled Water: AOAC Performance Tested MethodSM 082101.3M™ Petrifilm™ 大肠菌群计数平板验证用于瓶装水中大肠菌群的计数:AOAC 经性能测试的方法 SM 082101。
J AOAC Int. 2022 Apr 27;105(3):866-875. doi: 10.1093/jaoacint/qsab137.
10
Validation of RAPID E. coli 2 for enumeration and differentiation of Escherichia coli and other coliform bacteria in selected foods--Performance-Tested Method 050601.RAPID E. coli 2用于选定食品中大肠杆菌和其他大肠菌群细菌计数及鉴别方法的验证——性能测试方法050601
J AOAC Int. 2007 Sep-Oct;90(5):1284-315.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of coliform paper test and ATP bioluminescence assay for monitoring the disinfection of kitchen utensils in canteens of hebei, China.河北省食堂餐具消毒监测中大肠菌群纸片法与ATP生物发光法的比较
Heliyon. 2023 Mar 24;9(4):e14839. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14839. eCollection 2023 Apr.
2
Improving the accuracy of coliform detection in meat products using modified dry rehydratable film method.使用改良的干可复水膜法提高肉制品中大肠菌群检测的准确性。
Food Sci Biotechnol. 2020 May 30;29(9):1289-1294. doi: 10.1007/s10068-020-00778-8. eCollection 2020 Sep.