Rosenberg Nora E, Graybill Lauren A, Wesevich Austin, McGrath Nuala, Golin Carol E, Maman Suzanne, Bhushan Nivedita, Tsidya Mercy, Chimndozi Limbikani, Hoffman Irving F, Hosseinipour Mina C, Miller William C
*UNC Project, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lilongwe, Malawi; †School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; ‡Departments of Epidemiology and Health Behavior, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; §Faculty of Medicine and Faculty of Social, Human, and Mathematical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; and ‖Department of Epidemiology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017 Aug 1;75(4):417-425. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001398.
In sub-Saharan Africa couple HIV testing and counseling (CHTC) has been associated with substantial increases in safe sex, especially when at least one partner is HIV infected. However, this relationship has not been characterized in an Option B+ context.
The study was conducted at the antenatal clinic at Bwaila District Hospital in Lilongwe, Malawi in 2016 under an Option B+ program.
Ninety heterosexual couples with an HIV-infected pregnant woman (female-positive couples) and 47 couples with an HIV-uninfected pregnant woman (female-negative couples) were enrolled in an observational study. Each couple member was assessed immediately before and 1 month after CHTC for safe sex (abstinence or consistent condom use in the last month). Generalized estimating equations were used to model change in safe sex before and after CHTC and to compare safe sex between female-positive and female-negative couples.
Mean age was 26 years among women and 32 years among men. Before CHTC, safe sex was comparable among female-positive couples (8%) and female-negative couples (2%) [risk ratio (RR): 3.7, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.5 to 29.8]. One month after CHTC, safe sex was higher among female-positive couples (75%) than among female-negative couples (3%) (RR: 30.0, 95% CI: 4.3 to 207.7). Safe sex increased substantially after CTHC for female-positive couples (RR 9.6, 95% CI: 4.6 to 20.0), but not for female-negative couples (RR: 1.2, 95% CI: 0.1 to 18.7).
Engaging pregnant couples in CHTC can have prevention benefits for couples with an HIV-infected pregnant woman, but additional prevention approaches may be needed for couples with an HIV-uninfected pregnant woman.
在撒哈拉以南非洲地区,夫妻艾滋病毒检测与咨询(CHTC)与安全性行为的显著增加相关,尤其是当至少一方感染艾滋病毒时。然而,在“B+方案”背景下,这种关系尚未得到描述。
该研究于2016年在马拉维利隆圭市布瓦伊拉区医院的产前诊所开展,采用“B+方案”。
90对一方感染艾滋病毒的异性夫妻(女性阳性夫妻)和47对未感染艾滋病毒的孕妇夫妻(女性阴性夫妻)参与了一项观察性研究。在进行夫妻艾滋病毒检测与咨询之前及之后1个月,对每对夫妻的成员进行安全性行为评估(过去一个月内禁欲或坚持使用避孕套)。采用广义估计方程对夫妻艾滋病毒检测与咨询前后安全性行为的变化进行建模,并比较女性阳性夫妻和女性阴性夫妻之间的安全性行为。
女性平均年龄为26岁,男性平均年龄为32岁。在夫妻艾滋病毒检测与咨询之前,女性阳性夫妻(8%)和女性阴性夫妻(2%)的安全性行为相当[风险比(RR):3.7,95%置信区间(CI):0.5至29.8]。在夫妻艾滋病毒检测与咨询之后1个月,女性阳性夫妻(75%)的安全性行为高于女性阴性夫妻(3%)(RR:30.0,95%CI:4.3至207.7)。对于女性阳性夫妻,夫妻艾滋病毒检测与咨询之后安全性行为大幅增加(RR 9.6,95%CI:4.6至20.0),但对于女性阴性夫妻则未增加(RR:1.2,95%CI:0.1至18.7)。
让孕妇夫妻参与夫妻艾滋病毒检测与咨询对有感染艾滋病毒孕妇的夫妻有预防益处,但对于未感染艾滋病毒孕妇的夫妻可能需要额外的预防措施。