Suppr超能文献

健康科学合作关系中察觉到的利益冲突。

Perceived conflict of interest in health science partnerships.

作者信息

Besley John C, McCright Aaron M, Zahry Nagwan R, Elliott Kevin C, Kaminski Norbert E, Martin Joseph D

机构信息

College of Communication Arts and Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.

Lyman Briggs College, Department of Sociology, Environmental Science and Policy Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Apr 20;12(4):e0175643. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175643. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

University scientists conducting research on topics of potential health concern often want to partner with a range of actors, including government entities, non-governmental organizations, and private enterprises. Such partnerships can provide access to needed resources, including funding. However, those who observe the results of such partnerships may judge those results based on who is involved. This set of studies seeks to assess how people perceive two hypothetical health science research collaborations. In doing so, it also tests the utility of using procedural justice concepts to assess perceptions of research legitimacy as a theoretical way to investigate conflict of interest perceptions. Findings show that including an industry collaborator has clear negative repercussions for how people see a research partnership and that these perceptions shape people's willingness to see the research as a legitimate source of knowledge. Additional research aimed at further communicating procedures that might mitigate the impact of industry collaboration is suggested.

摘要

从事潜在健康问题研究的大学科学家通常希望与一系列行为主体合作,包括政府实体、非政府组织和私营企业。这种合作关系可以提供获得所需资源的途径,包括资金。然而,观察此类合作关系结果的人可能会根据参与方来评判这些结果。这组研究旨在评估人们如何看待两个假设的健康科学研究合作项目。在此过程中,它还测试了使用程序正义概念来评估研究合法性认知作为一种调查利益冲突认知的理论方法的效用。研究结果表明,纳入行业合作伙伴对人们如何看待研究合作关系有明显的负面影响,而且这些认知会影响人们将该研究视为合法知识来源的意愿。建议开展进一步的研究,以更好地传达可能减轻行业合作影响的程序。

相似文献

1
Perceived conflict of interest in health science partnerships.健康科学合作关系中察觉到的利益冲突。
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 20;12(4):e0175643. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175643. eCollection 2017.
5
At issue: A model for academic/industry collaboration.争议点:学术/产业合作模式
Schizophr Bull. 2004;30(4):997-1004. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a007148.
7
Partnerships between universities and industry.
JAMA. 2002 Mar 20;287(11):1398-9; author reply 1399-400. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.11.1398.

引用本文的文献

7
Open Science in regulatory environmental risk assessment.监管环境风险评估中的开放科学。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2021 Nov;17(6):1229-1242. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4433. Epub 2021 May 18.

本文引用的文献

3
Understanding bias--the case for careful study.理解偏差——认真研究的必要性
N Engl J Med. 2015 May 14;372(20):1959-63. doi: 10.1056/NEJMms1502497.
7
The impact of accident attention, ideology, and environmentalism on American attitudes toward nuclear energy.
Risk Anal. 2014 May;34(5):949-64. doi: 10.1111/risa.12151. Epub 2013 Dec 13.
9
Industry sponsorship and research outcome.行业赞助与研究成果。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12:MR000033. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000033.pub2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验