Suppr超能文献

如果考虑经皮左心耳封堵术,对于不耐受抗血小板治疗的患者是否有替代治疗方法?

Is there an alternative treatment for patients intolerant to antiplatelet therapy if percutaneous left atrial appendage closure is considered?

作者信息

Akca F, Verberkmoes N J, Verstraeten S E, van Laar C, van Putte B P, van Straten A H M

机构信息

Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Neth Heart J. 2017 Sep;25(9):510-515. doi: 10.1007/s12471-017-0987-y.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure has become of major interest for patients with atrial fibrillation intolerant to oral anticoagulation therapy (OAC). Patients with a contraindication to both OAC and antiplatelet therapy are not eligible for percutaneous LAA closure. We aimed to find an alternative treatment for these specific patients.

METHODS

From March 2014 until December 2015 five patients were referred for percutaneous LAA closure. Alternative treatment was necessary due to an absolute contraindication to OAC and antiplatelet therapy (n = 4) or after previous failed percutaneous device implantation (n = 1). A stand-alone full thoracoscopic closure of the LAA using the Atriclip PRO device (AtriCure Inc., Dayton, OH, USA) was performed under guidance of transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE). After three months all patients underwent a computed tomography scan. Mean follow-up was 7.2 months [range 4.5-9.8 months].

RESULTS

All procedures were achieved without the occurrence of complications. Complete LAA closure was obtained in all patients without any residual flow confirmed by TEE. Postoperative computed tomography confirmed persisting adequate clip positioning with complete LAA closure and absence of intracardial thrombi. During follow-up no thromboembolic events occurred.

CONCLUSION

For atrial fibrillation patients with an absolute contraindication to OAC and antiplatelet therapy a stand-alone, minimally invasive thoracoscopic closure of the LAA is a safe and feasible alternative treatment. This might be a solution to avoid serious bleeding complications while eliminating the thromboembolic risk originating from the LAA in patients who are not eligible for percutaneous LAA closure.

摘要

引言

对于不耐受口服抗凝治疗(OAC)的房颤患者,左心耳(LAA)封堵术已成为主要关注的治疗方法。对OAC和抗血小板治疗均有禁忌的患者不符合经皮LAA封堵术的条件。我们旨在为这些特定患者寻找替代治疗方法。

方法

2014年3月至2015年12月期间,有5例患者被转诊接受经皮LAA封堵术。由于OAC和抗血小板治疗存在绝对禁忌(n = 4)或先前经皮器械植入失败(n = 1),需要采用替代治疗方法。在经食管超声心动图(TEE)引导下,使用Atriclip PRO装置(美国俄亥俄州代顿市的AtriCure公司)进行独立的全胸腔镜LAA封堵术。三个月后,所有患者均接受了计算机断层扫描。平均随访时间为7.2个月[范围4.5 - 9.8个月]。

结果

所有手术均未发生并发症。所有患者均实现了LAA完全封堵,TEE证实无残余血流。术后计算机断层扫描证实夹子位置持续合适,LAA完全封堵且无心内血栓形成。随访期间未发生血栓栓塞事件。

结论

对于对OAC和抗血小板治疗有绝对禁忌的房颤患者,独立的、微创的胸腔镜LAA封堵术是一种安全可行的替代治疗方法。这可能是一种解决方案,可避免严重出血并发症,同时消除不符合经皮LAA封堵术条件的患者因LAA产生的血栓栓塞风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a53/5571603/65cccf4724b8/12471_2017_987_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验