Bath Philip Mw, Krishnan Kailash, Appleton Jason P
Stroke, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, City Hospital Campus, Nottingham, UK, NG5 1PB.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 21;4(4):CD000398. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000398.pub2.
Nitric oxide (NO) has multiple effects that may be beneficial in acute stroke, including lowering blood pressure, and promoting reperfusion and cytoprotection. Some forms of nitric oxide synthase inhibition (NOS-I) may also be beneficial. However, high concentrations of NO are likely to be toxic to brain tissue. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 1998, and last updated in 2002.
To assess the safety and efficacy of NO donors, L-arginine, and NOS-I in people with acute stroke.
We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched 6 February 2017), MEDLINE (1966 to June 2016), Embase (1980 to June 2016), ISI Science Citation Indexes (1981 to June 2016), Stroke Trials Registry (searched June 2016), International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) (searched June 2016), Clinical Trials registry (searched June 2016), and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (searched June 2016). Previously, we had contacted drug companies and researchers in the field.
Randomised controlled trials comparing nitric oxide donors, L-arginine, or NOS-I versus placebo or open control in people within one week of onset of confirmed stroke.
Two review authors independently applied the inclusion criteria, assessed trial quality and risk of bias, and extracted data. The review authors cross-checked data and resolved issues through discussion. We obtained published and unpublished data, as available. Data were reported as mean difference (MD) or odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
We included five completed trials, involving 4197 participants; all tested transdermal glyceryl trinitrate (GTN), an NO donor. The assessed risk of bias was low across the included studies; one study was double-blind, one open-label and three were single-blind. All included studies had blinded outcome assessment. Overall, GTN did not improve the primary outcome of death or dependency at the end of trial (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) > 2, OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.10, 4195 participants, high-quality evidence). GTN did not improve secondary outcomes, including death (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.50) and quality of life (MD -0.01, 95% CI -0.17 to 0.15) at the end of trial overall (high-quality evidence). Systolic/diastolic blood pressure (BP) was lower in people treated with GTN (MD -7.2 mmHg (95% CI -8.6 to -5.9) and MD -3.3 (95% CI -4.2 to -2.5) respectively) and heart rate was higher (MD 2.0 beats per minute (95% CI 1.1 to 2.9)). Headache was more common in those randomised to GTN (OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.55 to 3.62). We did not find any trials assessing other nitrates, L-arginine, or NOS-I.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is currently insufficient evidence to recommend the use of NO donors, L-arginine or NOS-I in acute stroke, and only one drug (GTN) has been assessed. In people with acute stroke, GTN reduces blood pressure, increases heart rate and headache, but does not alter clinical outcome (all based on high-quality evidence).
一氧化氮(NO)具有多种可能对急性中风有益的作用,包括降低血压、促进再灌注和细胞保护。某些形式的一氧化氮合酶抑制(NOS-I)可能也有益处。然而,高浓度的NO可能对脑组织有毒性。这是Cochrane系统评价的更新,该评价首次发表于1998年,上次更新于2002年。
评估NO供体、L-精氨酸和NOS-I在急性中风患者中的安全性和疗效。
我们检索了Cochrane中风小组试验注册库(最后检索时间为2017年2月6日)、MEDLINE(1966年至2016年6月)、Embase(1980年至2016年6月)、ISI科学引文索引(1981年至2016年6月)、中风试验注册库(2016年6月检索)、国际标准随机对照试验编号(ISRCTN)(2016年6月检索)、临床试验注册库(2016年6月检索)以及国际临床试验注册平台(ICTRP)(2016年6月检索)。此前,我们已联系该领域的制药公司和研究人员。
在确诊中风发病一周内,比较NO供体、L-精氨酸或NOS-I与安慰剂或开放对照的随机对照试验。
两位综述作者独立应用纳入标准,评估试验质量和偏倚风险,并提取数据。综述作者交叉核对数据并通过讨论解决问题。我们尽可能获取已发表和未发表的数据。数据报告为平均差(MD)或比值比(OR)及95%置信区间(CI)。
我们纳入了五项完成的试验,涉及4197名参与者;所有试验均测试了一种NO供体——经皮硝酸甘油(GTN)。纳入研究中评估的偏倚风险较低;一项研究为双盲,一项为开放标签,三项为单盲。所有纳入研究均采用了盲法结局评估。总体而言,GTN并未改善试验结束时死亡或依赖的主要结局(改良Rankin量表(mRS)>2,OR 0.97,95%CI 0.86至1.10,4195名参与者,高质量证据)。GTN并未改善次要结局,包括试验结束时的死亡(OR 0.78,95%CI 0.40至1.50)和总体生活质量(MD -0.01,95%CI -0.17至0.15)(高质量证据)。接受GTN治疗的患者收缩压/舒张压(BP)较低(分别为MD -7.2 mmHg(95%CI -8.6至-5.9)和MD -3.3(95%CI -4.2至-2.5)),心率较高(MD 2.0次/分钟(95%CI 1.1至2.9))。随机分组至GTN组的患者中头痛更为常见(OR 2.37,95%CI 1.55至3.62)。我们未找到评估其他硝酸盐、L-精氨酸或NOS-I的试验。
目前尚无足够证据推荐在急性中风中使用NO供体、L-精氨酸或NOS-I,且仅评估了一种药物(GTN)。在急性中风患者中,GTN可降低血压、增加心率并导致头痛,但不改变临床结局(均基于高质量证据)。