Suppr超能文献

急诊科工作人员改善老年人姑息治疗服务的重点:一项定性研究。

Emergency department staff priorities for improving palliative care provision for older people: A qualitative study.

机构信息

1 Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing & Midwifery, King's College London, London, UK.

2 Ronald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Palliat Med. 2018 Feb;32(2):417-425. doi: 10.1177/0269216317705789. Epub 2017 Apr 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Emergency department-based palliative care services are increasing, but research to develop these services rarely includes input from emergency clinicians, jeopardizing the effectiveness of subsequent palliative care interventions.

AIM

To collaboratively identify with emergency clinicians' improvement priorities for emergency department-based palliative care for older people.

DESIGN

This was one component of an experience-based co-design project, conducted using semi-structured interviews and feedback sessions.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: In-depth interviews with 15 emergency clinicians (nurses and doctors) at a large teaching hospital emergency department in the United Kingdom exploring experiences of palliative care delivery for older people. A thematic analysis identified core challenges that were presented to 64 clinicians over five feedback sessions, validating interview findings, and identifying shared priorities for improving palliative care delivery.

RESULTS

Eight challenges emerged: patient age; access to information; communication with patients, family members, and clinicians; understanding of palliative care; role uncertainty; complex systems and processes; time constraints; and limited training and education. Through feedback sessions, clinicians selected four challenges as improvement priorities: time constraints; communication and information; systems and processes; and understanding of palliative care. As resulting improvement plans evolved, "training and education" replaced "time constraints" as a priority.

CONCLUSION

Clinician priorities for improving emergency department-based palliative care were identified through collaborative, iterative processes. Though generally aware of older palliative patients' needs, clinicians struggled to provide high-quality care due to a range of complex factors. Further research should identify whether priorities are shared across other emergency departments, and develop, implement, and evaluate strategies developed by clinicians.

摘要

背景

基于急诊的姑息治疗服务正在增加,但很少有研究从急诊临床医生的角度来开发这些服务,这可能会影响后续姑息治疗干预的效果。

目的

与急诊临床医生合作,确定改善老年人基于急诊的姑息治疗的优先事项。

设计

这是一个基于经验的共同设计项目的一个组成部分,采用半结构化访谈和反馈会议进行。

地点/参与者:在英国一家大型教学医院的急诊部,对 15 名急诊临床医生(护士和医生)进行深入访谈,探讨他们为老年人提供姑息治疗的经验。主题分析确定了核心挑战,并在五次反馈会议上呈现给 64 名临床医生,验证了访谈结果,并确定了改善姑息治疗的共同优先事项。

结果

出现了 8 个挑战:患者年龄;获取信息;与患者、家属和临床医生的沟通;对姑息治疗的理解;角色不确定性;复杂的系统和流程;时间限制;以及有限的培训和教育。通过反馈会议,临床医生选择了四个挑战作为改进的优先事项:时间限制;沟通和信息;系统和流程;以及对姑息治疗的理解。随着改进计划的发展,“培训和教育”取代了“时间限制”成为优先事项。

结论

通过协作、迭代的过程确定了改善基于急诊的姑息治疗的临床医生优先事项。尽管临床医生普遍了解老年姑息治疗患者的需求,但由于一系列复杂因素,他们难以提供高质量的护理。进一步的研究应该确定这些优先事项是否在其他急诊部门中得到共享,并开发、实施和评估临床医生制定的策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验