Wright Rebecca, Lowton Karen, Hansen Bryan R, Grocott Patricia
JCMB, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, King's College London, 57 Waterloo Road, London SE1 8WA, UK.
Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, 525 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2020 Dec 23;3:100016. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2020.100016. eCollection 2021 Nov.
Older adults (>65 years) with palliative care needs are increasingly accessing the emergency department. Some interventions have been developed to improve the care provided, but the majority of research has focused on provider perspectives. Limited understanding of patient and family experiences and priorities means important needs may be overlooked.
To explore patient and family caregiver experiences and identify their improvement priorities for emergency department-based palliative care delivery.
A participatory action research design, experienced-based co-design, was adopted. Filmed and audio-recorded interviews and individual feedback sessions were used to capture patient data.
An urban emergency department in the UK.
Six patients aged ≥65 with palliative care needs and four family caregivers were recruited from the emergency department.
Participants took part in individual or dyad audio-recorded or filmed interviews. Interview data were analyzed using thematic framework analysis. One-to-one feedback sessions with participants were used to validate findings and rank the themes to identify patient and family priorities for improvement.
The analysis identified five prominent themes that captured the patient and family experience of emergency department-based palliative care. 1) Systems and processes; 2) communication and information; 3) changing expectations (of what can be done for one's health on a personal and system level); 4) recommendations (for improving palliative care in the emergency department); and, 5) acknowledgement and validation (of the patient and family). All themes except 'recommendations' were selected as improvement priorities. Within the context of these improvement priorities, participants provided rich insights into their perceptions of care and identified small but significant actions that could be implemented to improve their experiences of palliative care in the emergency department. These included being offered a drink or phone call, being included in conversations about their care, and being kept informed of what was happening with their care.
Older people with palliative care needs and their family caregivers were able to share their experiences and highlight improvement priorities for emergency department care using the experience-based co-design approach. Their experiences offer new perspectives, which can be used alongside emergency department and palliative care clinician perspectives to support service and outcome measure development in future emergency department-based palliative care.
#EBCD study shows older adults with #PalliativeCare needs value communication, compassion & inclusion in #SharedDecisionMaking in the #ED.
有姑息治疗需求的老年人(>65岁)越来越多地前往急诊科就诊。已开展了一些干预措施以改善所提供的护理,但大多数研究都集中在提供者的角度。对患者及其家属的经历和优先事项了解有限,这意味着重要需求可能被忽视。
探讨患者及其家庭护理人员的经历,并确定他们对急诊科姑息治疗的改进优先事项。
采用了参与式行动研究设计,即基于经验的协同设计。通过拍摄和录音访谈以及个人反馈会议来收集患者数据。
英国一家城市急诊科。
从急诊科招募了6名有姑息治疗需求的65岁及以上患者和4名家庭护理人员。
参与者参加个人或双人的录音或录像访谈。访谈数据采用主题框架分析法进行分析。与参与者进行一对一的反馈会议,以验证研究结果并对主题进行排序,以确定患者及其家庭的改进优先事项。
分析确定了五个突出主题,这些主题反映了患者及其家属在急诊科姑息治疗中的经历。1)系统和流程;2)沟通与信息;3)期望的变化(在个人和系统层面上对自身健康所能做之事的期望);4)建议(关于改善急诊科姑息治疗);5)对患者及其家属的认可和肯定。除“建议”外,所有主题均被选为改进优先事项。在这些改进优先事项的背景下,参与者对他们的护理认知提供了丰富的见解,并确定了一些虽小但很重要的行动,这些行动可以实施以改善他们在急诊科的姑息治疗体验。这些行动包括提供饮品或打电话、让他们参与有关其护理的谈话以及随时告知他们护理进展情况。
有姑息治疗需求 的老年人及其家庭护理人员能够利用基于经验的协同设计方法分享他们的经历,并突出急诊科护理的改进优先事项。他们的经历提供了新的视角,可与急诊科和姑息治疗临床医生的视角一起用于支持未来基于急诊科的姑息治疗的服务和结果指标的制定。
#急诊姑息治疗研究表明,有#姑息治疗需求的老年人重视在#急诊科#共同决策中的沟通、同情和包容。