• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在医院死亡:英格兰的社会经济不平等趋势

Dying in hospital: socioeconomic inequality trends in England.

作者信息

Barratt Helen, Asaria Miqdad, Sheringham Jessica, Stone Patrick, Raine Rosalind, Cookson Richard

机构信息

Senior Clinical Research Associate, Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, UK.

Research Fellow, Centre for Health Economics, University of York, UK.

出版信息

J Health Serv Res Policy. 2017 Jul;22(3):149-154. doi: 10.1177/1355819616686807. Epub 2017 Jan 11.

DOI:10.1177/1355819616686807
PMID:28429981
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5548360/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe trends in socioeconomic inequality in the proportion of deaths occurring in hospital, during a period of sustained effort by the NHS in England to improve end of life care.

METHODS

Whole-population, small area longitudinal study involving 5,260,871 patients of all ages who died in England from 2001/2002 to 2011/2012. Our primary measure of inequality was the slope index of inequality. This represents the estimated gap between the most and least deprived neighbourhood in England, allowing for the gradient in between. Neighbourhoods were geographic Lower Layer Super Output Areas containing about 1500 people each.

RESULTS

The overall proportion of patients dying in hospital decreased from 49.5% to 43.6% during the study period, after initially increasing to 52.0% in 2004/2005. There was substantial 'pro-rich' inequality, with an estimated difference of 5.95 percentage points in the proportion of people dying in hospital (confidence interval 5.26 to 6.63), comparing the most and least deprived neighbourhoods in 2011/2012. There was no significant reduction in this gap over time, either in absolute terms or relative to the mean, despite the overall reduction in the proportion of patients dying in hospital.

CONCLUSIONS

Efforts to reduce the proportion of patients dying in hospital in England have been successful overall but did not reduce inequality. Greater understanding of the reasons for such inequality is required before policy changes can be determined.

摘要

目的

描述在英格兰国民医疗服务体系(NHS)持续努力改善临终关怀期间,医院死亡比例方面的社会经济不平等趋势。

方法

进行全人群、小区域纵向研究,涉及2001/2002年至2011/2012年期间在英格兰死亡的5,260,871名各年龄段患者。我们衡量不平等的主要指标是不平等斜率指数。这代表了英格兰最贫困和最不贫困社区之间的估计差距,并考虑到两者之间的梯度变化。社区为地理上的下层超级输出区,每个区域约有1500人。

结果

在研究期间,医院死亡患者的总体比例从49.5%降至43.6%,最初在2004/2005年升至52.0%。存在显著的“亲富”不平等现象,在2011/2012年,比较最贫困和最不贫困社区,医院死亡人群比例估计相差5.95个百分点(置信区间为5.26至6.63)。尽管医院死亡患者比例总体下降,但随着时间推移,这一差距在绝对值上或相对于均值而言均未显著缩小。

结论

英格兰为降低医院死亡患者比例所做的努力总体上取得了成功,但并未减少不平等。在确定政策变化之前,需要更深入了解这种不平等的原因。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c148/5548360/03ce39f8e829/10.1177_1355819616686807-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c148/5548360/c8b09fea5928/10.1177_1355819616686807-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c148/5548360/03ce39f8e829/10.1177_1355819616686807-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c148/5548360/c8b09fea5928/10.1177_1355819616686807-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c148/5548360/03ce39f8e829/10.1177_1355819616686807-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Dying in hospital: socioeconomic inequality trends in England.在医院死亡:英格兰的社会经济不平等趋势
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2017 Jul;22(3):149-154. doi: 10.1177/1355819616686807. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
2
3
Unequal socioeconomic distribution of the primary care workforce: whole-population small area longitudinal study.基层医疗劳动力的社会经济分布不均:全人群小区域纵向研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 19;6(1):e008783. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008783.
4
How a universal health system reduces inequalities: lessons from England.全民健康系统如何减少不平等:来自英国的经验教训。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 Jul;70(7):637-43. doi: 10.1136/jech-2015-206742. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
5
Primary care and health inequality: Difference-in-difference study comparing England and Ontario.初级医疗保健与健康不平等:比较英格兰和安大略省的双重差分研究
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 28;12(11):e0188560. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188560. eCollection 2017.
6
The costs of inequality: whole-population modelling study of lifetime inpatient hospital costs in the English National Health Service by level of neighbourhood deprivation.不平等的代价:按邻里贫困程度对英国国民医疗服务体系中终身住院费用进行的全人群建模研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 Oct;70(10):990-6. doi: 10.1136/jech-2016-207447. Epub 2016 May 17.
7
Age specific trends in mortality disparities by socio-economic deprivation in small geographical areas of England, 2002-2018: A retrospective registry study.2002 - 2018年英格兰小地理区域内社会经济剥夺导致的死亡率差异的年龄特异性趋势:一项回顾性登记研究。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021 Jun 7;7:100136. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100136. eCollection 2021 Aug.
8
Outcomes and inequalities in diabetes from 2004/2005 to 2011/2012: English longitudinal study.2004/2005年至2011/2012年糖尿病的结局与不平等:英国纵向研究
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Jan;67(654):e1-e9. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X688381. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
9
Socioeconomic inequalities in distance to and participation in a community-based running and walking activity: A longitudinal ecological study of parkrun 2010 to 2019.社区跑步和步行活动的参与度和距离方面的社会经济不平等:2010 年至 2019 年 parkrun 的纵向生态研究。
Health Place. 2021 Sep;71:102626. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102626. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
10
The impact of NHS resource allocation policy on health inequalities in England 2001-11: longitudinal ecological study.NHS 资源分配政策对英格兰 2001-11 年卫生不平等状况的影响:纵向生态研究。
BMJ. 2014 May 27;348:g3231. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g3231.

引用本文的文献

1
The ideal and the real: Patient and bereaved family caregiver perspectives on the significance of place of death.理想与现实:患者及失去亲人的家庭照顾者对死亡地点意义的看法
Death Stud. 2024;48(4):312-325. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2023.2225042. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
2
The end of life experiences of people living with socio-economic deprivation in the developed world: an integrative review.发达国家中社会经济贫困人群的临终经历:综合回顾。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Nov 5;21(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01080-6.
3
Socioeconomic Disparity Trends in End-of-Life Care for Cancer and Non-Cancer Patients: Are We Closing the Gap?

本文引用的文献

1
The costs of inequality: whole-population modelling study of lifetime inpatient hospital costs in the English National Health Service by level of neighbourhood deprivation.不平等的代价:按邻里贫困程度对英国国民医疗服务体系中终身住院费用进行的全人群建模研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 Oct;70(10):990-6. doi: 10.1136/jech-2016-207447. Epub 2016 May 17.
2
How a universal health system reduces inequalities: lessons from England.全民健康系统如何减少不平等:来自英国的经验教训。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 Jul;70(7):637-43. doi: 10.1136/jech-2015-206742. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
3
Is home always the best and preferred place of death?
癌症和非癌症患者临终关怀中的社会经济差异趋势:我们正在缩小差距吗?
Clin Epidemiol. 2022 May 4;14:653-664. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S362170. eCollection 2022.
4
Economics of death and dying: a critical evaluation of environmental damages and healthcare reforms across the globe.死亡与临终经济学:对全球环境损害和医疗改革的批判性评估。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Oct;26(29):29799-29809. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-06159-x. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
家总是最佳且首选的死亡之地吗?
BMJ. 2015 Oct 7;351:h4855. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h4855.
4
A call for equity in the delivery of UK palliative care.呼吁在英国提供姑息治疗时实现公平。
Lancet. 2015 Apr 18;385(9977):1478. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60736-X.
5
Closing the divide: the Harvard Global Equity Initiative-Lancet Commission on global access to pain control and palliative care.弥合差距:哈佛全球公平倡议-《柳叶刀》全球疼痛控制与姑息治疗可及性委员会
Lancet. 2015 Aug 22;386(9995):722-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60289-6. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
6
Opinions of patients with cancer on the relative importance of place of death in the context of a 'good death'.癌症患者对于在“善终”背景下死亡地点的相对重要性的看法。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2011 Dec;1(3):310-4. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000041. Epub 2011 Aug 25.
7
Heterogeneity and changes in preferences for dying at home: a systematic review.临终地点偏好的异质性和变化:系统评价。
BMC Palliat Care. 2013 Feb 15;12:7. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-12-7.
8
Reversal of the British trends in place of death: time series analysis 2004-2010.英国死亡地点趋势逆转:2004-2010 年时间序列分析。
Palliat Med. 2012 Mar;26(2):102-7. doi: 10.1177/0269216311432329. Epub 2012 Jan 18.
9
The hospital environment for end of life care of older adults and their families: an integrative review.老年人及其家庭终末期关怀的医院环境:综合评价。
J Adv Nurs. 2012 May;68(5):981-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05900.x. Epub 2011 Dec 29.
10
Achieving the preferred place of care for hospitalized patients at the end of life.实现临终住院患者首选关怀地。
Palliat Med. 2011 Jun;25(4):333-6. doi: 10.1177/0269216310387459. Epub 2011 Jan 12.