Zandy Shannon L, Doherty James M, Wibisono Nathan D, Gonzales Rueben A
Division of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Division of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2017 Jun 15;1055-1056:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2017.04.003. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
Reversed-phase HPLC with derivatization using o-phthalaldehyde (OPA) and sulfite allows electrochemical detection of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in microdialysis samples. However, OPA/sulfite derivatives have been reported to produce lower fluorescent yield than OPA derivatives using organic thiols as the nucleophile. To overcome this limitation we examined excitation and emission spectra, reaction time, pH, and concentration of reagents in the derivatization solution. Optimal detection parameters were determined as λ=220nm and λ=385nm for maximal fluorescence. The derivatization reaction occurred immediately and the product was stable up to 24 h [corrected]. A pH of 10.4 for the borate buffer used in the derivatization solution was significantly better than lower pH. Increasing the amount of sulfite combined with diluting the derivatization solution in borate buffer resulted in complete separation of the GABA peak from contaminants without any loss in signal. Controlling the temperature of the detector at 15°C significantly improved sensitivity with a detection limit of approximately 1nM. To validate this assay, we performed microdialysis in the dorsal striatum and ventral tegmental area (VTA) of adult Long Evans rats. GABA concentrations in dialysates were determined using external standards and standard additions, in order to further confirm interfering peaks were not present in biological samples. Within the dorsal striatum (n=4), basal GABA concentrations were 12.9±2.2 and 14.5±2.2nM (external and additions, respectively). Respective basal GABA concentrations in the VTA (n=3) were 4.6±1.1 and 5.1±0.6nM. Thus, we have developed a novel, sensitive fluorescence method to determine GABA in microdialysates using HPLC of an OPA/sulfite derivative.
使用邻苯二甲醛(OPA)和亚硫酸盐衍生化的反相高效液相色谱法可实现对微透析样品中γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)的电化学检测。然而,据报道,与使用有机硫醇作为亲核试剂的OPA衍生物相比,OPA/亚硫酸盐衍生物产生的荧光产率较低。为克服这一局限性,我们研究了衍生化溶液中的激发和发射光谱、反应时间、pH值及试剂浓度。确定最佳检测参数为λ=220nm和λ=385nm以实现最大荧光。衍生化反应立即发生,产物在长达24小时内保持稳定[已校正]。衍生化溶液中使用的硼酸盐缓冲液pH值为10.4明显优于较低的pH值。增加亚硫酸盐的量并在硼酸盐缓冲液中稀释衍生化溶液可使GABA峰与污染物完全分离,且信号无任何损失。将检测器温度控制在15°C可显著提高灵敏度,检测限约为1nM。为验证该检测方法,我们在成年Long Evans大鼠的背侧纹状体和腹侧被盖区(VTA)进行了微透析。使用外标法和标准加入法测定透析液中的GABA浓度,以进一步确认生物样品中不存在干扰峰。在背侧纹状体(n = 4)中,基础GABA浓度分别为12.9±2.2和14.5±2.2nM(外标法和标准加入法)。VTA(n = 3)中的基础GABA浓度分别为4.6±1.1和5.1±0.6nM。因此,我们开发了一种新颖、灵敏的荧光方法,通过OPA/亚硫酸盐衍生物的高效液相色谱法测定微透析液中的GABA。