• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

你开车没问题吗?餐厅用餐者的通勤行为与血液酒精浓度

Are you okay to drive? Commuting behavior and blood alcohol concentrations among restaurant diners.

作者信息

Scott-Parker Bridie, Stokes Leanne, Panaho Shane, Cawkwell Megan, Caldwell Jamie

机构信息

a Adolescent Risk Research Unit , Sunshine Coast Mind and Neuroscience-Thompson Institute, University of the Sunshine Coast , Birtinya , Queensland , Australia.

b School of Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Business, and Law , University of the Sunshine Coast , Birtinya , Queensland , Australia.

出版信息

Traffic Inj Prev. 2017 Oct 3;18(7):673-680. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1293824. Epub 2017 Feb 25.

DOI:10.1080/15389588.2017.1293824
PMID:28436736
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Drink driving is widely recognized as a major road safety problem. In Australia, health promotion messages encourage monitoring the number of standard drinks consumed prior to driving. This pilot research aimed to investigate commuting behavior and blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of diners, including intended drivers, at Sunshine Coast restaurants.

METHODS

Five hundred and forty-four diners (n = 260 males) consented to participate in a brief interview and to use a breathalyzer device to measure their BAC.

RESULTS

Forty percent of participants advised they don't drink and drive (34% of males, 45% of females; 67.25% of <17-20 years, 30.5% of 50-59 years), and of the remaining participants, 75% advised they count the number of their drinks (69% of males, 84% of females; 32% of <17-20 years, 82% of 50-59 years), while 10% of participants monitored their BAC by how they were feeling (12% of males, 6% of females). Thirty-seven percent of participants said it was easy/very easy to estimate their BAC (41% of males; 33% of females; 21% of <17-20 years, 43% of 50-59 years). The actual BAC was less than expected for 56% of participants, with one-third underestimating BAC and some intended drivers having an actual BAC in excess of the 0.05 limit.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the proportion of diners who reported they count the number of drinks, or use feelings as a way to gauge BAC, coupled with the considerable proportion who underestimated their BAC, a safer public health message is to avoid driving if you intend to drink. In addition, targeted intervention for experienced drivers (and, arguably, drinkers) appears warranted, as every participant aged less than 21 years who stated he or she would drive home indeed had a zero BAC. Interestingly every female driver who stated she would be driving home also had a legal BAC, suggesting gender-specific intervention.

摘要

目的

酒后驾车被广泛认为是一个主要的道路安全问题。在澳大利亚,健康促进信息鼓励人们在开车前监测饮用的标准饮品数量。这项初步研究旨在调查阳光海岸地区餐厅用餐者(包括有意驾车者)的通勤行为和血液酒精浓度(BAC)。

方法

544名用餐者(n = 260名男性)同意参与简短访谈,并使用呼气酒精含量测定仪测量他们的BAC。

结果

40%的参与者表示他们不会酒后驾车(男性为34%,女性为45%;17至20岁以下的为67.25%,50至59岁的为30.5%),在其余参与者中,75%表示他们会计算饮酒量(男性为69%,女性为84%;17至20岁以下的为32%,50至59岁的为82%),而10%的参与者通过自身感觉来监测BAC(男性为12%,女性为6%)。37%的参与者表示很容易/非常容易估计自己的BAC(男性为41%;女性为33%;17至20岁以下的为21%,50至59岁的为43%)。56%的参与者实际BAC低于预期,三分之一的人低估了BAC,一些有意驾车者的实际BAC超过了0.05的限制。

结论

鉴于报告会计算饮酒量或通过感觉来判断BAC的用餐者比例,以及相当一部分人低估了自己的BAC,更安全的公共卫生信息是如果打算饮酒就避免开车。此外,对有经验的驾驶者(可以说,饮酒者)进行有针对性的干预似乎是必要的,因为每个表示会开车回家的21岁以下参与者的BAC确实为零。有趣的是,每个表示会开车回家的女性驾驶者的BAC也都在合法范围内,这表明需要进行针对性别的干预。

相似文献

1
Are you okay to drive? Commuting behavior and blood alcohol concentrations among restaurant diners.你开车没问题吗?餐厅用餐者的通勤行为与血液酒精浓度
Traffic Inj Prev. 2017 Oct 3;18(7):673-680. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1293824. Epub 2017 Feb 25.
2
Perceived driving safety and estimated blood alcohol concentration (BAC) the morning after drinking amongst young Australians attending a music festival: a cross-sectional survey.音乐节后次日早晨澳大利亚年轻群体对驾驶安全性和血液酒精浓度(BAC)的感知:一项横断面调查。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2018 Jun 20;13(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13011-018-0157-2.
3
Motorists' knowledge, attitudes and practices toward alcohol-impaired driving/riding in Ghana.加纳驾驶者对酒后驾驶/骑行的认知、态度和行为
Traffic Inj Prev. 2017 Jan 2;18(1):28-34. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2016.1193172. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
4
Multiple "Lower BAC" offenders: Characteristics and response to remedial interventions.多名“BAC 较低”违法者:特征与补救干预措施的反应。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Jun;115:110-117. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.02.019. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
5
Profile of women detected drink driving via Roadside Breath Testing (RBT) in Queensland, Australia, between 2000 and 2011.2000年至2011年间澳大利亚昆士兰州通过路边呼气测试(RBT)检测出的酒驾女性概况。
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Jun;67:67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.02.006. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
6
Understanding the context of alcohol impaired driving for fatal crash-involved drivers: A descriptive case analysis.了解涉及致命撞车事故的酒驾司机的背景情况:一项描述性案例分析。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2017 Nov 17;18(8):781-787. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1322696. Epub 2017 May 2.
7
Blood alcohol concentration in fatally injured drivers and the efficacy of alcohol policies of the new law on road traffic safety: A retrospective 10-year study in autonomous province of Vojvodina, Republic of Serbia.致命伤驾驶员的血液酒精浓度及新道路交通安全法酒精政策的效力:塞尔维亚共和国伏伊伏丁那自治省的一项10年回顾性研究
Traffic Inj Prev. 2016 Aug 17;17(6):553-7. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1125479. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
8
Road safety implications of the blood alcohol concentrations among alcohol users exiting bars in northern Ghana.加纳北部酒吧饮酒者血液酒精浓度对道路安全的影响
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018;19(8):799-805. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1503415. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
9
Drivers who self-estimate lower blood alcohol concentrations are riskier drivers after drinking.自我估计血液酒精浓度较低的司机在饮酒后驾车风险更高。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2016 Apr;233(8):1387-94. doi: 10.1007/s00213-016-4233-x. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
10
General Motor Vehicle Drivers' Knowledge and Practices Regarding Drink Driving in Yinchuan and Guangzhou, China.中国银川和广州一般机动车驾驶员关于酒后驾车的知识与行为
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16(7):652-7. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.1001509.