Viano David C, Parenteau Chantal S
a ProBiomechanics LLC , Bloomfield Hills , Michigan.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2017 Oct 3;18(7):730-735. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1299144. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
This is a descriptive study of the frequency and risk for brainstem injury by crash type, belt use, and crash severity (delta-V). NASS-CDS electronic cases were reviewed to see whether the transition from vehicles without advanced airbags and seat belts and side airbags and curtains to vehicles with the safety technologies has influenced the risk for brainstem injury.
1994-2013 NASS-CDS was analyzed to determine the number of brainstem injuries in nonejected adults (15+ years old) in vehicle crashes. Crashes were grouped by front, side, rear, and rollover. The effect of belt use was investigated. Light vehicles were included with model year (MY) 1994+. Occupants with severe head injury (Abbreviated Injury Scale [AIS] 4+) and Maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale (MAIS) 4+F injury were also determined. The risk for injury with standard errors was determined using the MAIS 0+F exposure by belt use and crash type. NASS-CDS electronic cases were studied with brainstem injury in 2001-2013 MY vehicles.
NASS-CDS indicates there are 872 ± 133 cases of brainstem injury per year. About 16.0% of AIS 4+ head injury involves the brainstem. For belted occupants, the highest risk for brainstem injury was in side impacts at 0.065 ± 0.010%. In contrast, the highest risk for brainstem injury was 0.310 ± 0.291% in rear impacts and 0.310 ± 0.170% in rollovers for unbelted occupants. The risk for brainstem injury increased with crash severity. The highest risk for brainstem injury was 3.54 ± 1.45% in crashes with >72 km/h (>45 mph) delta-V. Exponential functions fit the change in risk with delta-V. Eighteen NASS-CDS electronic cases showed that brainstem injury occurred in very severe collisions where the occupant experienced multiple injuries from intrusion or impact on vehicle structures stiffened by deformation.
The risk for brainstem injury in belted occupants has remained essentially constant over 20 years, whereas the risk for MAIS 4+F injury has declined 38.3%. The prevention of brainstem injuries must address the extreme speed of collisions and weight mismatches that overwhelm structures, seat belts, frontal airbags, side airbags, and curtains in modern vehicles.
本研究旨在描述不同碰撞类型、安全带使用情况及碰撞严重程度(速度变化量,delta-V)下脑干损伤的发生频率及风险。回顾国家汽车抽样系统 - 碰撞数据系统(NASS-CDS)中的电子病例,以探究从无先进安全气囊、安全带、侧面安全气囊和安全气帘的车辆向配备这些安全技术的车辆转变是否影响了脑干损伤风险。
分析1994 - 2013年的NASS-CDS数据,确定车辆碰撞中未被抛出的成年人(15岁及以上)脑干损伤的数量。碰撞按正面、侧面、后面和翻滚进行分组。研究安全带使用的影响。纳入1994年及以后车型年份(MY)的轻型车辆。还确定了重伤(简略损伤量表[AIS] 4+)和最大简略损伤量表(MAIS)4+F损伤的乘员。根据安全带使用情况和碰撞类型,使用MAIS 0+F暴露量确定损伤风险及标准误。对2001 - 2013年车型年份车辆中发生脑干损伤的NASS-CDS电子病例进行研究。
NASS-CDS表明每年有872±133例脑干损伤病例。约16.0%的AIS 4+头部损伤涉及脑干。对于系安全带的乘员,脑干损伤风险最高的是侧面碰撞,为0.065±0.010%。相比之下,未系安全带的乘员在后面碰撞中脑干损伤风险最高,为0.310±0.291%,在翻滚碰撞中为0.310±0.170%。脑干损伤风险随碰撞严重程度增加。速度变化量>72公里/小时(>45英里每小时)的碰撞中,脑干损伤风险最高,为3.54±1.45%。指数函数符合风险随速度变化量的变化情况。18例NASS-CDS电子病例显示,脑干损伤发生在非常严重的碰撞中,乘员因车辆结构因变形而变硬导致的侵入或撞击而受到多处损伤。
20年来,系安全带乘员的脑干损伤风险基本保持不变,而MAIS 4+F损伤风险下降了38.3%。预防脑干损伤必须解决碰撞速度极快以及重量不匹配的问题,这些问题会使现代车辆中的结构、安全带、正面安全气囊、侧面安全气囊和安全气帘不堪重负。