Balakumar Vikram, Murugan Raghavan, Sileanu Florentina E, Palevsky Paul, Clermont Gilles, Kellum John A
1The Center for Critical Care Nephrology, CRISMA, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.2The Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.3The Clinical Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness (CRISMA) Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.4Renal Section, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.
Crit Care Med. 2017 Aug;45(8):e749-e757. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002372.
Among critically ill patients with acute kidney injury, exposure to positive fluid balance, compared with negative fluid balance, has been associated with mortality and impaired renal recovery. However, it is unclear whether positive and negative fluid balances are associated with poor outcome compared to patients with even fluid balance (euvolemia). In this study, we examined the association between exposure to positive or negative fluid balance, compared with even fluid balance, on 1-year mortality and renal recovery.
Retrospective cohort study.
Eight medical-surgical ICUs at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Critically ill patients admitted between July 2000 and October 2008.
None.
Among 18,084 patients, fluid balance was categorized as negative (< 0%), even (0% to < 5%), or positive (≥ 5%). Following propensity matching, positive fluid balance, compared with even or negative fluid balance, was associated with increased mortality (30.3% vs 21.1% vs 22%, respectively; p < 0.001). Using Gray's model, negative fluid balance, compared with even fluid balance, was associated with lower short-term mortality (adjusted hazard ratio range, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.68-0.96) but higher long-term mortality (adjusted hazard ratio range, 1.16-1.22; p = 0.004). Conversely, positive fluid balance was associated with higher mortality throughout 1-year (adjusted hazard ratio range, 1.30-1.92; p < 0.001), which was attenuated in those who received renal replacement therapy (positive fluid balance × renal replacement therapy interaction (adjusted hazard ratio range, 0.43-0.89; p < 0.001). Of patients receiving renal replacement therapy, neither positive (adjusted odds ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.68-1.4) nor negative (adjusted odds ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.43-1.55) fluid balance was associated with renal recovery.
Among critically ill patients, exposure to positive or negative fluid balance, compared with even fluid balance, was associated with higher 1-year mortality. This mortality risk associated with positive fluid balance, however, was attenuated by use of renal replacement therapy. We found no association between fluid balance and renal recovery.
在急性肾损伤的重症患者中,与负液体平衡相比,正液体平衡与死亡率和肾脏恢复受损有关。然而,与液体平衡正常(血容量正常)的患者相比,正液体平衡和负液体平衡是否与不良结局相关尚不清楚。在本研究中,我们研究了与液体平衡正常相比,正液体平衡或负液体平衡与1年死亡率和肾脏恢复之间的关联。
回顾性队列研究。
宾夕法尼亚州匹兹堡市匹兹堡大学医学中心的8个内科-外科重症监护病房。
2000年7月至2008年10月期间收治的重症患者。
无。
在18084例患者中,液体平衡分为负平衡(<0%)、平衡(0%至<5%)或正平衡(≥5%)。经过倾向匹配后,与平衡或负液体平衡相比,正液体平衡与死亡率增加相关(分别为30.3%、21.1%和22%;p<0.001)。使用格雷模型,与液体平衡正常相比,负液体平衡与较低的短期死亡率相关(校正风险比范围为0.81;95%CI,0.68-0.96)但与较高的长期死亡率相关(校正风险比范围为1.16-1.22;p=0.004)。相反地,正液体平衡与整个1年期间较高的死亡率相关(校正风险比范围为1.30-1.92;p<0.001),在接受肾脏替代治疗的患者中这种情况有所减轻(正液体平衡×肾脏替代治疗交互作用(校正风险比范围为0.43-0.89;p<0.001)。在接受肾脏替代治疗的患者中,则正液体平衡(校正比值比为0.98;95%CI,0.68-1.4)和负液体平衡(校正比值比为0.81;95%CI,0.43-1.55)均与肾脏恢复无关。
在重症患者中,与液体平衡正常相比,正液体平衡或负液体平衡与较高的1年死亡率相关。然而,正液体平衡相关的这种死亡风险可通过肾脏替代治疗而减轻。我们发现液体平衡与肾脏恢复之间无关联。