Haider Adil H, Schneider Eric B, Kodadek Lisa M, Adler Rachel R, Ranjit Anju, Torain Maya, Shields Ryan Y, Snyder Claire, Schuur Jeremiah D, Vail Laura, German Danielle, Peterson Susan, Lau Brandyn D
Center for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard Medical School, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts2Department of Surgery, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jun 1;177(6):819-828. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0906.
The Institute of Medicine and The Joint Commission recommend routine documentation of patients' sexual orientation in health care settings. Currently, very few health care systems collect these data since patient preferences and health care professionals' support regarding collection of data about patient sexual orientation are unknown.
To identify the optimal patient-centered approach to collect sexual orientation data in the emergency department (ED) in the Emergency Department Query for Patient-Centered Approaches to Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity study.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: An exploratory, sequential, mixed-methods design was used first to evaluate qualitative interviews conducted in the Baltimore, Maryland, and Washington, DC, areas. Fifty-three patients and 26 health care professionals participated in the qualitative interviews. Interviews were followed by a national online survey, in which 1516 (potential) patients (244 lesbian, 289 gay, 179 bisexual, and 804 straight) and 429 ED health care professionals (209 physicians and 220 nurses) participated. Survey participants were recruited using random digit dialing and address-based sampling techniques.
Qualitative interviews were used to obtain the perspectives of patients and health care professionals on sexual orientation data collection, and a quantitative survey was used to gauge patients' and health care professionals' willingness to provide or obtain sexual orientation information.
Mean (SD) age of patient and clinician participants was 49 (16.4) and 51 (9.4) years, respectively. Qualitative interviews suggested that patients were less likely to refuse to provide sexual orientation than providers expected. Nationally, 154 patients (10.3%) reported that they would refuse to provide sexual orientation; however, 333 (77.8%) of all clinicians thought patients would refuse to provide sexual orientation. After adjustment for demographic characteristics, only bisexual patients had increased odds of refusing to provide sexual orientation compared with heterosexual patients (odds ratio, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.26-4.56).
Patients and health care professionals have discordant views on routine collection of data on sexual orientation. A minority of patients would refuse to provide sexual orientation. Implementation of a standardized, patient-centered approach for routine collection of sexual orientation data is required on a national scale to help to identify and address health disparities among lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations.
美国医学研究所和联合委员会建议在医疗保健机构中对患者的性取向进行常规记录。目前,很少有医疗保健系统收集这些数据,因为患者对收集其性取向数据的偏好以及医疗保健专业人员对此的支持情况尚不清楚。
在“以患者为中心的性取向和性别认同急诊科查询”研究中,确定在急诊科收集性取向数据的最佳以患者为中心的方法。
设计、背景和参与者:采用探索性、序贯性、混合方法设计,首先评估在马里兰州巴尔的摩市和华盛顿特区进行的定性访谈。53名患者和26名医疗保健专业人员参与了定性访谈。访谈之后进行了一项全国性在线调查,1516名(潜在)患者(244名女同性恋者、289名男同性恋者、179名双性恋者和804名异性恋者)和429名急诊科医疗保健专业人员(209名医生和220名护士)参与了该调查。调查参与者通过随机数字拨号和基于地址的抽样技术招募。
定性访谈用于获取患者和医疗保健专业人员对性取向数据收集的看法,定量调查用于衡量患者和医疗保健专业人员提供或获取性取向信息的意愿。
患者和临床医生参与者的平均(标准差)年龄分别为49(16.4)岁和51(9.4)岁。定性访谈表明,患者拒绝提供性取向的可能性低于提供者的预期。在全国范围内,154名患者(10.3%)报告称他们会拒绝提供性取向;然而,所有临床医生中有333名(77.8%)认为患者会拒绝提供性取向。在对人口统计学特征进行调整后,与异性恋患者相比,只有双性恋患者拒绝提供性取向的几率增加(优势比,2.40;95%置信区间,1.26 - 4.56)。
患者和医疗保健专业人员在性取向数据的常规收集方面存在不一致的看法。少数患者会拒绝提供性取向。需要在全国范围内实施一种标准化的、以患者为中心的方法来常规收集性取向数据,以帮助识别和解决女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋人群中的健康差异问题。