• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CT 上亚实性结节 Lung-RADS 标准的恶性估计:使用 NLST 结节时低风险和高风险谱的准确性。

Malignancy estimation of Lung-RADS criteria for subsolid nodules on CT: accuracy of low and high risk spectrum when using NLST nodules.

机构信息

Diagnostic Image Analysis Group, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2017 Nov;27(11):4672-4679. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4842-8. Epub 2017 Apr 24.

DOI:10.1007/s00330-017-4842-8
PMID:28439653
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5635094/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Lung-RADS proposes malignancy probabilities for categories 2 (<1%) and 4B (>15%). The purpose of this study was to quantify and compare malignancy rates for Lung-RADS 2 and 4B subsolid nodules (SSNs) on a nodule base.

METHODS

We identified all baseline SSNs eligible for Lung-RADS 2 and 4B in the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) database. Solid cores and nodule locations were annotated using in-house software. Malignant SSNs were identified by an experienced radiologist using NLST information. Malignancy rates and percentages of persistence were calculated.

RESULTS

Of the Lung-RADS 2SSNs, 94.3% (1790/1897) could be located on chest CTs. Likewise, 95.1% (331/348) of part-solid nodules ≥6 mm in diameter could be located. Of these, 120 had a solid core ≥8 mm, corresponding to category 4B. Category 2 SSNs showed a malignancy rate of 2.5%, exceeding slightly the proposed rate of <1%. Category 4B SSNs showed a malignancy rate of 23.9%. In both categories one third of benign lesions were transient.

CONCLUSION

Malignancy probabilities for Lung-RADS 2 and 4B generally match malignancy rates in SSNs. An option to include also category 2 SSNs for upgrade to 4X designed for suspicious nodules might be useful in the future. Integration of short-term follow-up to confirm persistence would prevent unnecessary invasive work-up in 4B SSNs.

KEY POINTS

• Malignancy probabilities for Lung-RADS 2/4B generally match malignancy risks in SSNs. • Transient rate between low-risk Lung-RADS 2 and high-risk 4B lesions were similar. • Upgrade of highly suspicious Lung-RADS 2 SSNs to Lung-RADS 4X might be useful. • Up to one third of the benign high-risk Lung-RADS 4B lesions were transient. • Short-term follow-up confirming persistence would avoid unnecessary invasive work-up of 4B lesions.

摘要

目的

Lung-RADS 为类别 2(<1%)和 4B(>15%)提出了恶性肿瘤概率。本研究的目的是定量比较 Lung-RADS 2 和 4B 亚实性结节(SSN)在结节基础上的恶性肿瘤发生率。

方法

我们从国家肺癌筛查试验(NLST)数据库中确定了所有符合 Lung-RADS 2 和 4B 标准的基线 SSN。使用内部软件对实性核心和结节位置进行注释。由一位经验丰富的放射科医生使用 NLST 信息识别恶性 SSN。计算恶性肿瘤发生率和持续存在的百分比。

结果

在 Lung-RADS 2 SSN 中,94.3%(1790/1897)可在胸部 CT 上定位。同样,直径≥6mm 的部分实性结节中,95.1%(331/348)可定位。其中,120 个有≥8mm 的实性核心,对应于 4B 类别。2 类 SSN 的恶性肿瘤发生率为 2.5%,略高于<1%的建议率。4B 类 SSN 的恶性肿瘤发生率为 23.9%。在这两个类别中,三分之一的良性病变是短暂的。

结论

Lung-RADS 2 和 4B 的恶性肿瘤概率通常与 SSN 的恶性肿瘤率相匹配。将来,将类别 2 SSN 纳入专为可疑结节设计的 4X 升级类别可能会很有用。通过短期随访确认持续性,可以防止 4B SSN 不必要的侵入性检查。

关键点

  1. Lung-RADS 2/4B 的恶性肿瘤概率通常与 SSN 的恶性肿瘤风险相匹配。

  2. 低风险 Lung-RADS 2 和高风险 4B 病变之间的短暂率相似。

  3. 将高度可疑的 Lung-RADS 2 SSN 升级为 Lung-RADS 4X 可能会很有用。

  4. 三分之一的良性高危 Lung-RADS 4B 病变是短暂的。

  5. 短期随访确认持续性可避免对 4B 病变进行不必要的侵入性检查。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98b8/5635094/3d66c7880d61/330_2017_4842_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98b8/5635094/4cd438dbc626/330_2017_4842_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98b8/5635094/3d66c7880d61/330_2017_4842_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98b8/5635094/4cd438dbc626/330_2017_4842_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98b8/5635094/3d66c7880d61/330_2017_4842_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Malignancy estimation of Lung-RADS criteria for subsolid nodules on CT: accuracy of low and high risk spectrum when using NLST nodules.CT 上亚实性结节 Lung-RADS 标准的恶性估计:使用 NLST 结节时低风险和高风险谱的准确性。
Eur Radiol. 2017 Nov;27(11):4672-4679. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4842-8. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
2
Lung-RADS Category 4X: Does It Improve Prediction of Malignancy in Subsolid Nodules?肺-放射学报告和数据系统(Lung-RADS)类别 4X:它是否能提高亚实性结节恶性肿瘤的预测准确性?
Radiology. 2017 Jul;284(1):264-271. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017161624. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
3
Cancer Risk in Subsolid Nodules in the National Lung Screening Trial.国家肺癌筛查试验中亚实性结节的癌症风险。
Radiology. 2019 Nov;293(2):441-448. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019190905. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
4
Vancouver Risk Calculator Compared with ACR Lung-RADS in Predicting Malignancy: Analysis of the National Lung Screening Trial.温哥华风险计算器与 ACR 肺-RADS 在预测恶性肿瘤中的比较:国家肺癌筛查试验分析。
Radiology. 2019 Apr;291(1):205-211. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018181050. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
5
Malignancy risk estimation of screen-detected nodules at baseline CT: comparison of the PanCan model, Lung-RADS and NCCN guidelines.基于基线 CT 筛查结节的恶性风险评估:PanCan 模型、Lung-RADS 和 NCCN 指南的比较。
Eur Radiol. 2017 Oct;27(10):4019-4029. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4767-2. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
6
Improved interobserver agreement on nodule type and Lung-RADS classification of subsolid nodules using computer-aided solid component measurement.使用计算机辅助实性成分测量提高亚实性结节的结节类型和 Lung-RADS 分类的观察者间一致性。
Eur J Radiol. 2022 Jul;152:110339. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110339. Epub 2022 May 5.
7
Discrimination between transient and persistent subsolid pulmonary nodules on baseline CT using deep transfer learning.基于深度迁移学习的基线 CT 鉴别亚实性肺结节的良恶性。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Dec;30(12):6913-6923. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07071-6. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
8
Predicting Malignancy Risk of Screen-Detected Lung Nodules-Mean Diameter or Volume.基于直径或体积预测筛查性肺结节的恶性风险
J Thorac Oncol. 2019 Feb;14(2):203-211. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.10.006. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
9
Detection of Subsolid Nodules in Lung Cancer Screening: Complementary Sensitivity of Visual Reading and Computer-Aided Diagnosis.肺癌筛查中亚实性结节的检测:视觉阅读和计算机辅助诊断的互补灵敏度。
Invest Radiol. 2018 Aug;53(8):441-449. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000464.
10
Cancer Risk in Nodules Detected at Follow-Up Lung Cancer Screening CT.随访肺癌筛查 CT 检测到的结节中的癌症风险。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022 Apr;218(4):634-641. doi: 10.2214/AJR.21.26927. Epub 2021 Nov 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Retrospective Analysis Comparing Lung-RADS v2022 and British Thoracic Society Guidelines for Differentiating Lung Metastases from Primary Lung Cancer.比较Lung-RADS v2022与英国胸科学会指南鉴别肺转移瘤与原发性肺癌的回顾性分析
Biomedicines. 2025 Jan 8;13(1):130. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13010130.
2
Surgical Resection of Benign Nodules in Lung Cancer Screening: Incidence and Features.肺癌筛查中良性结节的手术切除:发生率及特征
JTO Clin Res Rep. 2023 Nov 20;4(12):100605. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2023.100605. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Retrospective Analysis of Subsolid Nodules' Frequency Using Chest Computed Tomography Detection in an Outpatient Population.

本文引用的文献

1
Natural History of Pulmonary Subsolid Nodules: A Prospective Multicenter Study.肺部亚实性结节的自然史:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
J Thorac Oncol. 2016 Jul;11(7):1012-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.04.006. Epub 2016 Apr 16.
2
HRCT features distinguishing pre-invasive from invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas appearing as ground-glass nodules.高分辨率CT(HRCT)特征可区分表现为磨玻璃结节的浸润前与浸润性肺腺癌。
Eur Radiol. 2016 Sep;26(9):2921-8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-4131-3. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
3
Differentiating between Subsolid and Solid Pulmonary Nodules at CT: Inter- and Intraobserver Agreement between Experienced Thoracic Radiologists.
回顾性分析胸部 CT 检测在门诊人群中检出亚实性结节的频率。
Tomography. 2023 Aug 9;9(4):1494-1503. doi: 10.3390/tomography9040119.
4
Qualitative (and Quantitative) Values of the Lung-RADS and Computed Tomography in Diagnosing Solitary Pulmonary Nodules.Lung-RADS与计算机断层扫描在诊断孤立性肺结节中的定性(及定量)价值
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Nov 4;12(11):2699. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12112699.
5
Malignancy Prediction Capacity and Possible Prediction Model of Circulating Tumor Cells for Suspicious Pulmonary Lesions.循环肿瘤细胞对可疑肺部病变的恶性预测能力及可能的预测模型
J Pers Med. 2021 May 21;11(6):444. doi: 10.3390/jpm11060444.
6
Developing a lung nodule management protocol specifically for cardiac CT: Methodology in the DISCHARGE trial.制定专门针对心脏CT的肺结节管理方案:DISCHARGE试验的方法
Eur J Radiol Open. 2020 Jun 25;7:100235. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2020.100235. eCollection 2020.
7
Cancer Risk in Subsolid Nodules in the National Lung Screening Trial.国家肺癌筛查试验中亚实性结节的癌症风险。
Radiology. 2019 Nov;293(2):441-448. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019190905. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
8
A Decision Analysis of Follow-up and Treatment Algorithms for Nonsolid Pulmonary Nodules.非实性肺结节随访和治疗算法的决策分析。
Radiology. 2019 Feb;290(2):506-513. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018180867. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
在 CT 下区分亚实性和实性肺结节:有经验的胸部放射科医生的组内和组间一致性。
Radiology. 2016 Mar;278(3):888-96. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015150714. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
4
Persistent Pure Ground-Glass Nodules Larger Than 5 mm: Differentiation of Invasive Pulmonary Adenocarcinomas From Preinvasive Lesions or Minimally Invasive Adenocarcinomas Using Texture Analysis.直径大于5mm的持续性纯磨玻璃结节:利用纹理分析鉴别浸润性肺腺癌与浸润前病变或微浸润腺癌
Invest Radiol. 2015 Nov;50(11):798-804. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000186.
5
The British Thoracic Society guidelines on the investigation and management of pulmonary nodules.英国胸科学会肺结节诊治指南。
Thorax. 2015 Aug;70(8):794-8. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207221. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
6
CT Screening for Lung Cancer: Nonsolid Nodules in Baseline and Annual Repeat Rounds.CT筛查肺癌:基线及年度复查中的非实性结节
Radiology. 2015 Nov;277(2):555-64. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015142554. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
7
Using the CT features to differentiate invasive pulmonary adenocarcinoma from pre-invasive lesion appearing as pure or mixed ground-glass nodules.利用CT特征鉴别表现为纯磨玻璃结节或混合磨玻璃结节的浸润性肺腺癌与癌前病变。
Br J Radiol. 2015 Sep;88(1053):20140811. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20140811. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
8
Observer Variability for Classification of Pulmonary Nodules on Low-Dose CT Images and Its Effect on Nodule Management.低剂量 CT 图像上肺结节分类的观察者变异性及其对结节管理的影响。
Radiology. 2015 Dec;277(3):863-71. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015142700. Epub 2015 May 22.
9
Management of ground-glass opacities: should all pulmonary lesions with ground-glass opacity be surgically resected?磨玻璃影的处理:所有伴磨玻璃影的肺部病变都应手术切除吗?
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2013 Oct;2(5):354-63. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2218-6751.2013.09.03.
10
Performance of Lung-RADS in the National Lung Screening Trial: a retrospective assessment.国家肺癌筛查试验中Lung-RADS的表现:一项回顾性评估
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Apr 7;162(7):485-91. doi: 10.7326/M14-2086.