From the Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass (M.M.H.); Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, 101 Merrimac St, 10th Floor, Boston, MA 02114 (L.L.P., A.L.E., C.Y.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa, (E.M.B.); and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (C.Y.K.).
Radiology. 2019 Feb;290(2):506-513. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018180867. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
Purpose To evaluate management strategies and treatment options for patients with ground-glass nodules (GGNs) by using decision-analysis models. Materials and Methods A simulation was developed for 1 000 000 hypothetical patients with GGNs undergoing follow-up per the Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) recommendations. The initial age range was 55-75 years (mean, 64 years). Nodules could grow and develop solid components over time. Clinically significant malignancy rates were calibrated to data from the National Lung Screening Trial. Annual versus 3-year-interval follow-up of Lung-RADS category 2 nodules was compared, and different treatment strategies were tested (stereotactic body radiation therapy, surgery, and no therapy). Results Overall, 2.3% (22 584 of 1 000 000) of nodules were clinically significant malignancies; 6.3% (62 559 of 1 000 000) of nodules were treated. Only 30% (18 668 of 62 559) of Lung-RADS category 4B or 4X nodules were clinically significant malignancies. The risk of clinically significant malignancy for persistent nonsolid nodules after baseline was higher than Lung-RADS estimates for categories 2 and 3 (3% vs <1% and 1%-2%, respectively). Overall survival (OS) at 10 years was 72% (527 827 of 737 306; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 71%, 72%) with annual follow-up and 71% (526 507 of 737 306; 95% CI: 71%, 72%) with 3-year-interval follow-up (P < .01). At 10 years, OS among patients whose nodules progressed to Lung-RADS category 4B or 4X was 80% after radiation therapy (49 945 of 62 559; 95% CI: 80%, 80%), 79% after surgery (49 139 of 62 559; 95% CI: 78%, 79%), and 74% after no therapy (46 512 of 62 559; 95% CI: 74%, 75%) (P < .01). Conclusion Simulation modeling suggests that the follow-up interval for evaluating ground-glass nodules can be increased from 1 year to 3 years with minimal change in outcomes. Stereotactic body radiation therapy demonstrated the best outcomes compared with lobectomy and with no therapy for nonsolid nodules. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
目的 使用决策分析模型评估肺部磨玻璃结节(GGN)患者的管理策略和治疗选择。
材料与方法 为 100 万例接受肺部成像报告和数据系统(Lung-RADS)建议进行随访的假设性 GGN 患者开发了一个模拟。初始年龄范围为 55-75 岁(平均 64 岁)。结节可能随着时间的推移而生长并发展出实性成分。临床显著恶性肿瘤的发生率与国家肺癌筛查试验的数据相匹配。比较了 Lung-RADS 2 类结节的年度与 3 年间隔随访,并测试了不同的治疗策略(立体定向体部放射治疗、手术和不治疗)。
结果 总体而言,2.3%(100 万例中的 22584 例)的结节为临床显著恶性肿瘤;6.3%(100 万例中的 62559 例)的结节得到了治疗。只有 30%(Lung-RADS 4B 或 4X 类别的 62559 个结节中的 18668 个)为临床显著恶性肿瘤。基线后持续性非实性结节的临床显著恶性肿瘤风险高于 Lung-RADS 对 2 类和 3 类结节的估计(分别为 3%、<1%和 1%-2%)。10 年总生存率(OS)为接受年度随访的 72%(737306 例中的 527827 例;95%置信区间[CI]:71%,72%)和接受 3 年间隔随访的 71%(737306 例中的 526507 例;95%CI:71%,72%)(P<.01)。在进展为 Lung-RADS 4B 或 4X 类别的结节患者中,放射治疗后 10 年的 OS 为 80%(62559 例中的 49945 例;95%CI:80%,80%),手术后为 79%(62559 例中的 49139 例;95%CI:78%,79%),不治疗后为 74%(62559 例中的 46512 例;95%CI:74%,75%)(P<.01)。
结论 模拟研究表明,评估磨玻璃结节的随访间隔可以从 1 年延长至 3 年,而对结果的影响最小。与肺叶切除术相比,立体定向体部放射治疗对非实性结节的效果最好,且优于不治疗。