Department of Radiology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Changle West Road No. 127 Xi'an City 710032, Shaanxi Province, China.
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Changle West Road No. 127, Xi'an City 710032, Shaanxi Province, China.
Eur J Radiol. 2022 Jul;152:110339. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110339. Epub 2022 May 5.
The Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) classification of subsolid nodules (SSNs) can be challenging due to limited interobserver agreement in determining the type and size of the nodule. Our study aimed to assess the effect of a computer-aided method on the interobserver agreement of Lung-RADS classification for SSNs.
This study consisted of 156 SSNs in 121 patients who underwent initial CT screening for lung cancer. Three independent readers determined the nodule type and measured the size of the entire nodule as well as the solid component, first without and then assisted by a semi-automated computer-aided tool. They assigned to each nodule the corresponding Lung-RADS 1.1 category. Agreement in size measurements was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman indexes, while agreement in nodule type and Lung-RADS was determined using Fleiss kappa statistics. The relationship between final diagnosis of the nodules and Lung-RADS classifications was also evaluated.
Among the 156 nodules, manual size measurement reached an ICC of 0.994, and 48 nodules contained solid component measured by all the three readers both manually and semi-automatically. ICCs for the solid component measurement were 0.952, 0.997 and 0.996 for manual diameter, semi- automated diameter and volume measurement, respectively. Bias and 95% limits of agreement for average diameter of solid component were smaller with semi-automated measurements than with manual measurements. Kappa values of semi-automated assessment for nodule type (0.974) and Lung-RADS classification (0.958 for diameter and 0.952 for volume) were higher than with the manual measurements (0.783 for nodule type and 0.652 for Lung-RADS classification). Compared to manual work, the semi-automated assessment identified more 4B nodules among the 26 pathologically confirmed invasive adenocarcinomas (IACs).
Semi-automated assessment could improve the interobserver agreement of nodule type and Lung-RADS classification for SSNs, and be inclined to classify SSNs corresponding to pathologically confirmed IACs into higher risk categories.
由于在确定结节类型和大小方面的观察者间一致性有限,肺部 CT 筛查报告和数据系统(Lung-RADS)对亚实性结节(SSN)的分类具有一定挑战性。本研究旨在评估计算机辅助方法对 SSN 的 Lung-RADS 分类的观察者间一致性的影响。
本研究包括 121 例初始肺癌 CT 筛查患者的 156 个 SSN。3 名独立的读者首先确定结节类型,并测量整个结节以及实性成分的大小,然后在半自动计算机辅助工具的辅助下进行测量。他们将相应的 Lung-RADS 1.1 类别分配给每个结节。通过组内相关系数(ICC)和 Bland-Altman 指数评估大小测量的一致性,通过 Fleiss kappa 统计评估结节类型和 Lung-RADS 的一致性。还评估了结节的最终诊断与 Lung-RADS 分类之间的关系。
在 156 个结节中,手动测量的大小达到了 0.994 的 ICC,并且所有 3 名读者均手动和半自动地测量了 48 个结节的实性成分。手动直径、半自动直径和体积测量的实性成分 ICC 分别为 0.952、0.997 和 0.996。半自动测量的实性成分平均直径的偏倚和 95%一致性界限均小于手动测量。半自动评估的结节类型(0.974)和 Lung-RADS 分类(直径为 0.958,体积为 0.952)的 kappa 值高于手动测量(结节类型为 0.783,Lung-RADS 分类为 0.652)。与手动工作相比,半自动评估在 26 例经病理证实的浸润性腺癌(IAC)中识别出更多的 4B 结节。
半自动评估可以提高 SSN 结节类型和 Lung-RADS 分类的观察者间一致性,并且倾向于将与病理证实的 IAC 相对应的 SSN 分类为更高风险类别。