• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响创伤性脑损伤患者接受减压手术后出院(DAMA)的因素:综合分析。

Factors influencing discharge against medical advice (DAMA) in traumatic brain injury patients requiring decompressive surgery: a comprehensive analysis.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, 148, Gurodong-ro, Guro-gu, Seoul, 08308, Korea.

Department of Neurosurgery, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Jun 7;47(1):259. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-02499-6.

DOI:10.1007/s10143-024-02499-6
PMID:38844722
Abstract

raumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant global health concern, particularly affecting young individuals, and is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Despite improvements in treatment infrastructure, many TBI patients choose discharge against medical advice (DAMA), often declining necessary surgical interventions. We aimed to investigate the factors that can be associated with DAMA in TBI patients that were recommended to have surgical treatment. This study was conducted at single tertiary university center (2008-2018), by retrospectively reviewing 1510 TBI patients whom visited the emergency room. We analyzed 219 TBI surgical candidates, including 50 declining surgery (refused group) and the others whom agreed and underwent decompressive surgery. Retrospective analysis covered demographic characteristics, medical history, insurance types, laboratory results, CT scan findings, and GCS scores. Statistical analyses identified factors influencing DAMA. Among surgical candidates, 169 underwent surgery, while 50 declined. Age (60.8 ± 17.5 vs. 70.5 ± 13.8 years; p < 0.001), use of anticoagulating medication (p = 0.015), and initial GCS scores (9.0 ± 4.3 vs. 5.3 ± 3.2; p < 0.001) appeared to be associated with refusal of decompressive surgery. Based on our analysis, factors influencing DAMA for decompressive surgery included age, anticoagulant use, and initial GCS scores. Contrary to general expectations and some previous studies, our analysis revealed that the patients' medical conditions had a larger impact than socioeconomic status under the Korean insurance system, which fully covers treatment for TBI. This finding provides new insights into the factors affecting DAMA and could be valuable for future administrative plans involving national insurance.

摘要

创伤性脑损伤(TBI)是一个重大的全球健康问题,尤其影响年轻人,是全球范围内死亡率和发病率的主要原因。尽管治疗基础设施有所改善,但许多 TBI 患者选择违反医嘱出院(DAMA),经常拒绝必要的手术干预。我们旨在研究与推荐接受手术治疗的 TBI 患者的 DAMA 相关的因素。这项研究在一个单一的三级大学中心进行(2008-2018 年),通过回顾性分析 1510 名就诊急诊室的 TBI 患者。我们分析了 219 名 TBI 手术候选者,包括 50 名拒绝手术的患者(拒绝组)和其他同意并接受减压手术的患者。回顾性分析涵盖了人口统计学特征、病史、保险类型、实验室结果、CT 扫描结果和 GCS 评分。统计分析确定了影响 DAMA 的因素。在手术候选者中,169 名接受了手术,而 50 名拒绝了手术。年龄(60.8±17.5 岁比 70.5±13.8 岁;p<0.001)、使用抗凝药物(p=0.015)和初始 GCS 评分(9.0±4.3 分比 5.3±3.2 分;p<0.001)似乎与拒绝减压手术有关。根据我们的分析,影响减压手术 DAMA 的因素包括年龄、抗凝药物使用和初始 GCS 评分。与一般预期和一些先前的研究相反,我们的分析表明,在韩国保险制度下,患者的医疗状况比社会经济地位对 DAMA 的影响更大,该制度完全涵盖了 TBI 的治疗。这一发现为影响 DAMA 的因素提供了新的见解,并可能对涉及国家保险的未来行政计划具有价值。

相似文献

1
Factors influencing discharge against medical advice (DAMA) in traumatic brain injury patients requiring decompressive surgery: a comprehensive analysis.影响创伤性脑损伤患者接受减压手术后出院(DAMA)的因素:综合分析。
Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Jun 7;47(1):259. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-02499-6.
2
Sequential changes in Rotterdam CT scores related to outcomes for patients with traumatic brain injury who undergo decompressive craniectomy.接受减压性颅骨切除术的创伤性脑损伤患者的鹿特丹CT评分与预后相关的序贯变化。
J Neurosurg. 2016 Jun;124(6):1640-5. doi: 10.3171/2015.4.JNS142760. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
3
Letter to editor: Comments on, "Factors influencing discharge against medical advice (DAMA) in traumatic brain injury patients requiring decompressive surgery: a comprehensive analysis".致编辑的信:对《影响需要减压手术的创伤性脑损伤患者自动出院的因素:综合分析》的评论
Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Aug 30;47(1):515. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-02777-3.
4
Cisternostomy is not beneficial to reduce the occurrence of post-traumatic hydrocephalus in Traumatic Brain Injury.经蝶窦入路视神经减压术不能降低颅脑创伤后发生脑积水的风险。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024 Apr 30;166(1):200. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-06084-0.
5
Quantitative cerebral blood flow using xenon-enhanced CT after decompressive craniectomy in traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤去骨瓣减压术后应用氙增强 CT 进行定量脑血流检测。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Jul;129(1):241-246. doi: 10.3171/2017.4.JNS163036. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
6
Prognostic Predictors of Early Outcomes and Discharge Status of Patients Undergoing Decompressive Craniectomy After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.严重创伤性脑损伤患者行去骨瓣减压术后早期结局和出院状态的预后预测因素。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Jun;126:e101-e108. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.246. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
7
The basal cisternostomy for management of severe traumatic brain injury: A retrospective study.基底池造瘘术治疗重型颅脑损伤:一项回顾性研究。
Chin J Traumatol. 2025 Mar;28(2):118-123. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2024.09.007. Epub 2024 Nov 20.
8
Prognostic value of changes in brain tissue oxygen pressure before and after decompressive craniectomy following severe traumatic brain injury.去骨瓣减压术后脑组织氧压变化对严重颅脑损伤患者预后的评估价值。
J Neurosurg. 2018 May;128(5):1538-1546. doi: 10.3171/2017.1.JNS161840. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
9
Postoperative complications influencing the long-term outcome of head-injured patients after decompressive craniectomy.术后并发症影响颅脑损伤患者去骨瓣减压术后的长期预后。
Brain Behav. 2019 Jan;9(1):e01179. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1179. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
10
Prognostic significance of abnormal hematological parameters in severe traumatic brain injury requiring decompressive craniectomy.需要去骨瓣减压术的严重创伤性脑损伤患者血液学参数异常的预后意义。
J Neurosurg. 2019 Feb 8;132(2):545-551. doi: 10.3171/2018.10.JNS182293. Print 2020 Feb 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and validation of a prehospital-stage prediction tool for traumatic brain injury: a multicentre retrospective cohort study in Korea.开发和验证创伤性脑损伤的院前阶段预测工具:韩国多中心回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 12;12(1):e055918. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055918.
2
Decreasing Incidence and Mortality in Traumatic Brain Injury in Korea, 2008-2017: A Population-Based Longitudinal Study.2008-2017 年韩国创伤性脑损伤发生率和死亡率的下降:一项基于人群的纵向研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 26;17(17):6197. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176197.
3
Discharge against medical advice among neurological patients: Characteristics and outcomes.
未经医嘱擅自离院的神经科患者:特征和结局。
Health Serv Res. 2020 Oct;55(5):681-689. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13306. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
4
Disparities in Health Care Utilization of Adults With Traumatic Brain Injuries Are Related to Insurance, Race, and Ethnicity: A Systematic Review.创伤性脑损伤成年患者医疗保健利用方面的差异与保险、种族和民族有关:一项系统综述。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2018 May/Jun;33(3):E40-E50. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000338.
5
Treatment-limiting decisions in patients with severe traumatic brain injury in a Norwegian regional trauma center.严重创伤性脑损伤患者在挪威区域性创伤中心的治疗限制决策。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Apr 26;25(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0385-x.
6
Discharge Against Medical Advice in Traumatic Brain Injury: Follow-Up and Readmission Rate.创伤性脑损伤患者自动出院:随访及再入院率
Can J Neurol Sci. 2017 May;44(3):311-317. doi: 10.1017/cjn.2016.241. Epub 2016 May 26.
7
Utilization and Cost of Health Services in Individuals With Traumatic Brain Injury.创伤性脑损伤患者的医疗服务利用情况及费用
Glob J Health Sci. 2015 Apr 19;7(6):156-69. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v7n6p156.
8
Surgical decision making for the elderly patients in severe head injuries.老年重型颅脑损伤患者的手术决策
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2014 Apr;55(4):195-9. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2014.55.4.195. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
9
Characteristics of patients with acute traumatic brain injury discharged against medical advice in a level 1 urban trauma centre.一级城市创伤中心违背医嘱出院的急性创伤性脑损伤患者的特征
Brain Inj. 2014;28(10):1288-94. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2014.916820. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
10
Prognostic significance of age in traumatic brain injury.年龄在创伤性脑损伤中的预后意义。
J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2012 May;3(2):131-5. doi: 10.4103/0976-3147.98208.