• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阑尾炎评分可能有助于降低右下腹疼痛的治疗成本。

Appendicitis scores may be useful in reducing the costs of treatment for right lower quadrant pain.

作者信息

Kırkıl Cüneyt, Karabulut Koray, Aygen Erhan, Ilhan Yavuz Selim, Yur Mesut, Binnetoğlu Kenan, Bülbüller Nurullah

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Fırat University, Faculty of Medicine, Elazığ, Turkey.

出版信息

Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2013 Jan;19(1):13-9. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2013.88714.

DOI:10.5505/tjtes.2013.88714
PMID:23588973
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Unnecessary hospital admissions and negative appendectomies increase healthcare costs of patients with right lower quadrant (RLQ) pain. This study aimed to evaluate the impact on the cost of treatment of appendicitis scoring systems.

METHODS

Charts were reviewed of patients admitted to the general surgery ward of our hospital with RLQ pain within a year. Alvarado and Lintula scores were calculated, and a simulation was performed to determine the treatment charges that would have been generated had the scoring recommendations been used for admission and surgical decision-making.

RESULTS

Of the 114 admitted patients, 64 (56%) underwent appendectomy. The rate of negative appendectomy was 17.2%. The overall accuracy rates of the Alvarado and Lintula scores for both 'admit' and 'operate' decision-making were 82.7% and 91.9%, respectively (p=0.102). Total charges for the 114 patients were $39,655. If the Alvarado or Lintula score had been used, the total treatment charges would have been $34,087 and $25,772 (p=0.015 and p=0.000), with negative appendectomy rates of 18.5% and 3.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of Alvarado and Lintula scores for the decision of hospital admission and appendectomy would have reduced overall treatment charges for acute RLQ pain.

摘要

背景

不必要的住院治疗和阴性阑尾切除术增加了右下腹(RLQ)疼痛患者的医疗费用。本研究旨在评估阑尾炎评分系统对治疗费用的影响。

方法

回顾了我院普通外科病房一年内因RLQ疼痛入院患者的病历。计算Alvarado和Lintula评分,并进行模拟,以确定若将评分建议用于入院和手术决策会产生的治疗费用。

结果

114例入院患者中,64例(56%)接受了阑尾切除术。阴性阑尾切除术的发生率为17.2%。Alvarado和Lintula评分对于“入院”和“手术”决策的总体准确率分别为82.7%和91.9%(p = 0.102)。114例患者的总费用为39,655美元。如果使用Alvarado或Lintula评分,总治疗费用将分别为34,087美元和25,772美元(p = 0.015和p = 0.000),阴性阑尾切除术的发生率分别为18.5%和3.6%。

结论

采用Alvarado和Lintula评分进行入院和阑尾切除术决策可降低急性RLQ疼痛的总体治疗费用。

相似文献

1
Appendicitis scores may be useful in reducing the costs of treatment for right lower quadrant pain.阑尾炎评分可能有助于降低右下腹疼痛的治疗成本。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2013 Jan;19(1):13-9. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2013.88714.
2
External validation of Lintula score in Turkish acute appendicitis patients.林图拉评分在土耳其急性阑尾炎患者中的外部验证。
Int J Surg. 2012;10(1):25-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.11.006. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
3
Evaluation Of Modified Alvarado, Ripasa And Lintula Scoring System As Diagnostic Tools For Acute Appendicitis.改良阿尔瓦拉多、里帕萨和林图拉评分系统作为急性阑尾炎诊断工具的评估
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2020 Jan-Mar;32(1):46-50.
4
Alvarado score as an admission criterion in children with pain in right iliac fossa.阿尔瓦拉多评分作为右下腹疼痛儿童的入院标准。
Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2010 Sep-Dec;7(3):163-5. doi: 10.4103/0189-6725.70417.
5
Scoring systems in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the elderly.老年人急性阑尾炎诊断中的评分系统
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2011 Sep;17(5):396-400.
6
Comparison of RIPASA and Alvarado scores for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.RIPASA 评分与 Alvarado 评分对急性阑尾炎诊断的比较。
Singapore Med J. 2011 May;52(5):340-5.
7
Receiver operator characteristic curve analysis of the Lintula score for reduction of negative appendectomies in adults.用于减少成人阴性阑尾切除术的林图拉评分的受试者工作特征曲线分析。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2015 Feb;25(2):100-3.
8
Analysis of scores in diagnosis of acute appendicitis in women.女性急性阑尾炎诊断评分分析
Coll Antropol. 2005 Jun;29(1):133-8.
9
The accuracy of emergency medicine and surgical residents in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.急诊医学和外科住院医师在急性阑尾炎诊断中的准确性。
Am J Emerg Med. 2010 Sep;28(7):766-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2009.03.017. Epub 2010 Mar 25.
10
Diagnosing appendicitis at different time points in children with right lower quadrant pain: comparison between Pediatric Appendicitis Score and the Alvarado score.在右下腹痛的儿童中不同时间点诊断阑尾炎:儿科阑尾炎评分和 Alvarado 评分的比较。
World J Surg. 2012 Jan;36(1):216-21. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1310-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Accuracy of RIPASA and Lintula Scores in Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis Using Surgical Findings as the Gold Standard.以手术结果为金标准时,RIPASA评分和林图拉评分在诊断急性阑尾炎中的准确性。
Cureus. 2022 Nov 9;14(11):e31297. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31297. eCollection 2022 Nov.
2
Are the immature granulocyte count and percentage important in continue medical treatment in acute appendicitis? A prospective, randomized, and controlled study.不成熟粒细胞计数和百分比在急性阑尾炎继续治疗中重要吗?一项前瞻性、随机和对照研究。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022 Jul;28(7):979-987. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2021.76307.
3
Evaluation of CXCR1 as a possible diagnostic biomarker in acute appendicitis.
评估CXCR1作为急性阑尾炎潜在诊断生物标志物的价值。
Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2020 Winter;13(Suppl1):S106-S112.
4
Comparison between the specificity and sensitivity of the RIPASA and Alvarado Scoring systems in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis among patients with complaints of right iliac fossa.右下腹疼痛患者中RIPASA评分系统和阿尔瓦拉多评分系统在急性阑尾炎诊断中的特异性和敏感性比较
AIMS Public Health. 2020 Jan 2;7(1):1-9. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2020001. eCollection 2020.
5
Differential diagnoses of magnetic resonance imaging for suspected acute appendicitis in pregnant patients.妊娠期疑似急性阑尾炎患者磁共振成像的鉴别诊断
World J Emerg Med. 2018;9(1):26-32. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2018.01.004.
6
How much Reliable Is Alvarado Scoring System in Reducing Negative Appendectomy?阿尔瓦拉多评分系统在减少阴性阑尾切除术中的可靠性如何?
Indian J Surg. 2017 Apr;79(2):106-110. doi: 10.1007/s12262-015-1433-2. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
7
WSES Jerusalem guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis.WSES耶路撒冷急性阑尾炎诊断与治疗指南。
World J Emerg Surg. 2016 Jul 18;11:34. doi: 10.1186/s13017-016-0090-5. eCollection 2016.
8
Acute appendicitis: transcript profiling of blood identifies promising biomarkers and potential underlying processes.急性阑尾炎:血液转录谱分析鉴定出有前景的生物标志物及潜在的潜在机制。
BMC Med Genomics. 2016 Jul 15;9(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12920-016-0200-y.
9
Alvarado, Eskelinen, Ohhmann and Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis scores for diagnosis of acute appendicitis.阿尔瓦拉多、埃斯凯林恩、奥夫曼和 Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha 用于诊断急性阑尾炎的评分。
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Dec 21;19(47):9057-62. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i47.9057.