• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the Alvarado scoring system in the management of acute appendicitis.阿尔瓦拉多评分系统在急性阑尾炎管理中的评估
Turk J Surg. 2017 Sep 1;33(3):200-204. doi: 10.5152/turkjsurg.2017.3539. eCollection 2017.
2
The comparison of the effectiveness of tomography and Alvarado scoring system in patients who underwent surgery with the diagnosis of appendicitis.对诊断为阑尾炎并接受手术的患者进行断层扫描与阿尔瓦拉多评分系统有效性的比较。
Ulus Cerrahi Derg. 2015 Jun 24;32(2):111-4. doi: 10.5152/UCD.2015.2813. eCollection 2016.
3
Comparison of Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis and modified Alvarado scoring systems in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.拉贾·伊斯特里·彭吉兰·安娜克·萨利哈阑尾炎评分系统与改良阿尔瓦拉多评分系统在急性阑尾炎诊断中的比较。
ANZ J Surg. 2020 Apr;90(4):521-524. doi: 10.1111/ans.15607. Epub 2019 Dec 15.
4
Evaluation of modified Alvarado scoring system and RIPASA scoring system as diagnostic tools of acute appendicitis.改良阿瓦拉多评分系统和RIPASA评分系统作为急性阑尾炎诊断工具的评估
World J Emerg Med. 2017;8(4):276-280. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2017.04.005.
5
Comparison of RIPASA and Alvarado scores for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.RIPASA 评分与 Alvarado 评分对急性阑尾炎诊断的比较。
Singapore Med J. 2011 May;52(5):340-5.
6
Evaluation of the Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.阿尔瓦拉多评分在急性阑尾炎诊断中的评估
Trop Gastroenterol. 2004 Oct-Dec;25(4):184-6.
7
A Comparative Study of RIPASA Score and ALVARADO Score in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis.RIPASA评分与ALVARADO评分在急性阑尾炎诊断中的比较研究
J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Nov;8(11):NC03-5. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/9055.5170. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
8
How much Reliable Is Alvarado Scoring System in Reducing Negative Appendectomy?阿尔瓦拉多评分系统在减少阴性阑尾切除术中的可靠性如何?
Indian J Surg. 2017 Apr;79(2):106-110. doi: 10.1007/s12262-015-1433-2. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
9
Does alvarado score reduce the need for ultrasonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis?阿尔瓦拉多评分能否减少急性阑尾炎诊断中超声检查的必要性?
Niger J Clin Pract. 2020 Jun;23(6):764-767. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_328_19.
10
MODIFIED ALVARADO SCORE IN CHILDREN WITH DIAGNOSIS OF APPENDICITIS.诊断为阑尾炎的儿童的改良阿尔瓦拉多评分
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2017 Jan-Mar;30(1):51-52. doi: 10.1590/0102-6720201700010014.

引用本文的文献

1
Nationwide prospective audit for the evaluation of appendicitis risk prediction models in adults: right iliac fossa treatment (RIFT)-Turkey.全国范围内前瞻性评估成人阑尾炎风险预测模型的研究:右髂窝治疗(RIFT)-土耳其。
BJS Open. 2024 Sep 3;8(5). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae120.
2
Diagnostic accuracy of Alvarado scoring system relative to histopathological diagnosis for acute appendicitis: A retrospective cohort study.阿尔瓦拉多评分系统相对于急性阑尾炎组织病理学诊断的诊断准确性:一项回顾性队列研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Sep 2;81:104561. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104561. eCollection 2022 Sep.
3
A rare presentation of an ectopic kidney with pyelonephritis mimicking appendicitis.一例罕见的异位肾合并肾盂肾炎表现为类似阑尾炎的病例。
J Surg Case Rep. 2019 Nov 20;2019(11):rjz342. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjz342. eCollection 2019 Nov.
4
Accuracy of neutrophil lymphocyte ratio for diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children: A diagnostic study.中性粒细胞淋巴细胞比率对儿童急性阑尾炎诊断的准确性:一项诊断性研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2019 Oct 17;48:35-38. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2019.10.013. eCollection 2019 Dec.
5
Editorial comment on: 'Evaluation of the Alvarado scoring system in the management of acute appendicitis'.关于《急性阑尾炎管理中阿尔瓦拉多评分系统的评估》的编辑评论
Turk J Surg. 2017 Dec 1;33(4):320-321. doi: 10.5152/turkjsurg.2017.4002. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

1
Total leukocyte and neutrophil count as preventive tools in reducing negative appendectomies.全白细胞和中性粒细胞计数作为减少阴性阑尾切除术的预防工具。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2015 Mar;21(2):102-6. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2015.29626.
2
Prospective validation of Alvarado score and Pediatric Appendicitis Score for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children.阿尔瓦拉多评分和小儿阑尾炎评分在儿童急性阑尾炎诊断中的前瞻性验证
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2015 Mar;31(3):164-8. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000375.
3
Evaluation of the Alvarado score in acute abdominal pain.阿尔瓦拉多评分在急性腹痛中的评估
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2014 Mar;20(2):86-90. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2014.69639.
4
How reliable is the Alvarado score in acute appendicitis?阿尔瓦拉多评分在急性阑尾炎中可靠性如何?
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2014 Jan;20(1):12-8. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2014.60569.
5
Accuracies of diagnostic methods for acute appendicitis.急性阑尾炎诊断方法的准确性。
Am Surg. 2013 Jan;79(1):101-6.
6
The value of serum fibrinogen level in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.血清纤维蛋白原水平在急性阑尾炎诊断中的价值。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2012 Sep;18(5):384-8. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2012.58855.
7
The Alvarado score for predicting acute appendicitis: a systematic review.阿尔瓦拉多评分预测急性阑尾炎:系统评价。
BMC Med. 2011 Dec 28;9:139. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-139.
8
[Reliability of ultrasonography for diagnosing acute appendicitis].[超声检查诊断急性阑尾炎的可靠性]
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2011 Jan;17(1):19-22. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2011.82195.
9
The accuracy of emergency medicine and surgical residents in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.急诊医学和外科住院医师在急性阑尾炎诊断中的准确性。
Am J Emerg Med. 2010 Sep;28(7):766-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2009.03.017. Epub 2010 Mar 25.
10
The appendicitis inflammatory response score: a tool for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis that outperforms the Alvarado score.阑尾炎炎症反应评分:一种用于诊断急性阑尾炎的工具,其性能优于阿尔瓦拉多评分。
World J Surg. 2008 Aug;32(8):1843-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9649-y.

阿尔瓦拉多评分系统在急性阑尾炎管理中的评估

Evaluation of the Alvarado scoring system in the management of acute appendicitis.

作者信息

Özsoy Zeki, Yenidoğan Erdinç

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Gaziosmanpaşa University School of Medicine, Tokat, Turkey.

出版信息

Turk J Surg. 2017 Sep 1;33(3):200-204. doi: 10.5152/turkjsurg.2017.3539. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.5152/turkjsurg.2017.3539
PMID:28944334
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5602313/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aimed to show the effectiveness of Alvarado score and its components to predict the correct diagnosis of acute appendicitis and to find an optimum cut-off value for Alvarado score.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The patients who underwent surgical operation between January 2011 and January 2012 with the suspicion of acute appendicitis were included in the study. Their demographic and clinical features and histopathological results were retrieved from the medical records. They were divided into three groups according to their Alvarado scores. With the use of "receiver operating characteristic" curve analysis, the optimum cut-off value needed to make a correct diagnosis of acute appendicitis was determined.

RESULTS

In all, 156 patients were included into the study. The mean age was 31.41±13.27 years. Histopathologically, acute appendicitis was detected in 125 (80.1%) patients, and negative appendectomy was found in 31 patients (19.8%). Mean Alvarado score was 6.44±1.49. There was a significant correlation between negative appendectomy and low Alvarado score (p<0.001). The main component of Alvarado score that makes the difference was rebound. Fever higher than 37.3°C, rebound, loss of appetite, and existence of shifting pain were statistically differential components (p=0.042, p<0.001, p=0.045, p<0.001, respectively). The rate of correct diagnosis of acute appendicitis was maximum in group 3 (100%) and minimum in group 1 (21.7%). Optimum cut-off value for Alvarado score was 7.

CONCLUSION

Patients with an Alvarado score of over 7 can be taken into surgical operation without the need of imaging methods.

摘要

目的

在本研究中,我们旨在展示阿尔瓦拉多评分及其各组成部分在预测急性阑尾炎正确诊断方面的有效性,并找到阿尔瓦拉多评分的最佳临界值。

材料与方法

纳入2011年1月至2012年1月期间因疑似急性阑尾炎而接受手术的患者。从病历中获取他们的人口统计学和临床特征以及组织病理学结果。根据阿尔瓦拉多评分将他们分为三组。通过“受试者工作特征”曲线分析,确定急性阑尾炎正确诊断所需的最佳临界值。

结果

总共156名患者纳入研究。平均年龄为31.41±13.27岁。组织病理学检查发现,125例(80.1%)患者为急性阑尾炎,31例(19.8%)患者为阴性阑尾切除术。阿尔瓦拉多评分的平均值为6.44±1.49。阴性阑尾切除术与低阿尔瓦拉多评分之间存在显著相关性(p<0.001)。造成差异的阿尔瓦拉多评分的主要组成部分是反跳痛。体温高于37.3°C、反跳痛、食欲不振和转移性疼痛的存在在统计学上是有差异的组成部分(分别为p=0.042、p<0.001、p=0.045、p<0.001)。急性阑尾炎的正确诊断率在第3组最高(100%),在第1组最低(21.7%)。阿尔瓦拉多评分的最佳临界值为7。

结论

阿尔瓦拉多评分超过7分的患者无需影像学检查即可进行手术。