• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年患者与非老年患者冲击波碎石术的安全性及治疗结果比较。

Comparison of safety and outcomes of shock wave lithotripsy between elderly and non-elderly patients.

作者信息

Chen Yi-Zhong, Lin Wun-Rong, Lee Chih-Chiao, Sun Fang-Ju, Chow Yung-Chiong, Tsai Wei-Kung, Chiang Pai-Kai, Lin Ting-Po, Chen Marcelo, Chiu Allen W

机构信息

Department of Urology, MacKay Memorial Hospital.

School of Medicine, MacKay Medical College.

出版信息

Clin Interv Aging. 2017 Apr 11;12:667-672. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S134750. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.2147/CIA.S134750
PMID:28442896
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5396840/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study compared the clinical outcomes of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy between elderly (aged $65 years) and non-elderly (aged <65 years) patients.

METHODS

A retrospective review of medical records was performed on 483 (non-elderly: 245, elderly: 238) patients with upper urinary tract stones who underwent shock wave lithotripsy between 2007 and 2015. The demographic data, stone parameters, stone-free rate, retreatment rate, and complication rate were analyzed in both elderly and non-elderly patient groups.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between non-elderly and elderly patients in terms of stone-free rate (46.5% vs 41.1%, >0.05) regardless of stone site or stone size and overall retreatment rate (41.6% vs 37.0%, >0.05). Elderly patients had a higher complication rate than non-elderly patients (15.5% vs 23.5%, =0.026). The most common complication was flank pain. Receiver operating characteristic curves predicted that elderly patients (cutoff value: 65 years of age) had a higher risk of complications and that patients with smaller stones (cutoff value: 0.8 cm) had a higher stone-free rate.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that elderly patients with upper urinary tract stones undergoing shock wave lithotripsy had comparable efficacy for stone-free rates and retreatment rates, but higher complication rates.

摘要

背景

本研究比较了老年(年龄≥65岁)和非老年(年龄<65岁)患者体外冲击波碎石术的临床结果。

方法

对2007年至2015年间接受冲击波碎石术的483例上尿路结石患者(非老年:245例,老年:238例)的病历进行回顾性分析。分析了老年和非老年患者组的人口统计学数据、结石参数、结石清除率、再次治疗率和并发症发生率。

结果

无论结石部位、结石大小和总体再次治疗率如何,非老年和老年患者在结石清除率方面无显著差异(46.5%对41.1%,P>0.05)(41.6%对37.0%,P>0.05)。老年患者的并发症发生率高于非老年患者(15.5%对23.5%,P=0.026)。最常见的并发症是胁腹疼痛。受试者工作特征曲线预测,老年患者(临界值:65岁)并发症风险较高,结石较小的患者(临界值:0.8 cm)结石清除率较高。

结论

本研究表明,接受冲击波碎石术的老年上尿路结石患者在结石清除率和再次治疗率方面疗效相当,但并发症发生率较高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd6e/5396840/45a62e2633a9/cia-12-667Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd6e/5396840/deb69ada0a82/cia-12-667Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd6e/5396840/45a62e2633a9/cia-12-667Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd6e/5396840/deb69ada0a82/cia-12-667Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd6e/5396840/45a62e2633a9/cia-12-667Fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of safety and outcomes of shock wave lithotripsy between elderly and non-elderly patients.老年患者与非老年患者冲击波碎石术的安全性及治疗结果比较。
Clin Interv Aging. 2017 Apr 11;12:667-672. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S134750. eCollection 2017.
2
Comparison of electrohydraulic and electromagnetic extracorporeal shock wave lithotriptors for upper urinary tract stones in a single center.单中心比较两种体外冲击波碎石机(电磁式和液电式)治疗上尿路结石的疗效。
World J Urol. 2019 May;37(5):931-935. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2464-7. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
3
A new nomogram for prediction of outcome of pediatric shock-wave lithotripsy.一种用于预测儿童冲击波碎石术治疗结果的新列线图。
J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Apr;11(2):84.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.01.004. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
4
Optimization of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Delivery Rates Achieves Excellent Outcomes for Ureteral Stones: Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial.优化体外冲击波碎石术输送率可实现输尿管结石的优异疗效:一项前瞻性随机试验的结果。
J Urol. 2015 Aug;194(2):418-23. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.110. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
5
Low success rate of repeat shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones after failed initial treatment.初次治疗失败后输尿管结石重复冲击波碎石术的成功率较低。
J Urol. 2000 Dec;164(6):1905-7.
6
[Extracorporeal lithotripsy or ureteroscopy for the treatment of calculi of the lower ureter].体外冲击波碎石术或输尿管镜术治疗输尿管下段结石
Prog Urol. 1993 Feb;3(1):48-53.
7
Use of ureteral stent in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for upper urinary calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis.体外冲击波碎石术治疗上尿路结石中输尿管支架的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Urol. 2011 Oct;186(4):1328-35. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.05.073.
8
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for large ureteral stones using HM3 lithotriptor.使用HM3碎石机对大型输尿管结石进行体外冲击波碎石术。
J Urol. 2006 Oct;176(4 Pt 1):1449-52; discussion 1452. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.06.020.
9
Preoperative nomograms for predicting stone-free rate after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.用于预测体外冲击波碎石术后结石清除率的术前列线图。
J Urol. 2006 Oct;176(4 Pt 1):1453-6; discussion 1456-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.06.089.
10
Results of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of upper urinary tract stones.体外冲击波碎石术治疗上尿路结石的结果
Hinyokika Kiyo. 2007 Nov;53(11):771-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Flexible ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy with PolyScope for senile patients with renal calculi.使用聚光镜的软性输尿管镜钬激光碎石术治疗老年肾结石患者
Exp Ther Med. 2018 Sep;16(3):1723-1728. doi: 10.3892/etm.2018.6369. Epub 2018 Jun 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Age- and region-related changes in the biomechanical properties and composition of the human ureter.人类输尿管生物力学特性及组成的年龄和区域相关变化。
J Biomech. 2017 Jan 25;51:57-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.11.067. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
2
Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL): outcomes from a national SWL database in New Zealand.冲击波碎石术(SWL):来自新西兰全国SWL数据库的结果。
BJU Int. 2016 Apr;117 Suppl 4:76-81. doi: 10.1111/bju.13431. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
3
EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis.EAU 指南:尿石症的介入治疗
Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):475-82. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.041. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
4
Kidney stones: a global picture of prevalence, incidence, and associated risk factors.肾结石:全球范围内的患病率、发病率及相关风险因素概述
Rev Urol. 2010 Spring;12(2-3):e86-96.
5
Single center, single operator comparative study of the effectiveness of electrohydraulic and electromagnetic lithotripters in the management of 10- to 20-mm single upper urinary tract calculi.电液压碎石机与电磁碎石机治疗10至20毫米单个上尿路结石有效性的单中心、单操作者对比研究
Urology. 2008 Nov;72(5):991-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.03.050. Epub 2008 Sep 26.
6
[Significance of age on prognosis in patients treated by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy].
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 2008 May;99(4):571-7. doi: 10.5980/jpnjurol1989.99.571.
7
Is extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy the preferred treatment option for elderly patients with urinary stone? A multivariate analysis of the effect of patient age on treatment outcome.体外冲击波碎石术是老年尿石症患者的首选治疗方案吗?患者年龄对治疗结果影响的多因素分析。
BJU Int. 2007 Aug;100(2):392-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.06909.x. Epub 2007 Apr 13.
8
Shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones in elderly male patients.老年男性患者输尿管结石的冲击波碎石术
Aging Male. 2006 Sep;9(3):171-4. doi: 10.1080/13685530600907985.
9
Single-center experience using three shockwave lithotripters with different generator designs in management of urinary calculi.单中心使用三种具有不同发生器设计的冲击波碎石机治疗尿路结石的经验。
J Endourol. 2006 Jan;20(1):1-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.20.1.
10
A multivariate analysis of risk factors associated with subcapsular hematoma formation following electromagnetic shock wave lithotripsy.电磁冲击波碎石术后与肾包膜下血肿形成相关危险因素的多变量分析。
J Urol. 2004 Dec;172(6 Pt 1):2271-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000143459.03836.2d.