• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Do Non-Reflective Thinkers Apply Extreme Personal Meanings to their Activated Moods?

作者信息

Dodd Alyson L, Haigh Matthew

机构信息

Department of Psychology,Northumbria University,Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST,UK.

出版信息

Behav Cogn Psychother. 2017 Sep;45(5):483-496. doi: 10.1017/S1352465817000248. Epub 2017 Apr 26.

DOI:10.1017/S1352465817000248
PMID:28443523
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The integrative cognitive model of mood swings proposes that mood symptoms are driven by extreme, self-referent appraisals. For example, if activated mood is appraised positively, this prompts selection of mood regulation strategies that act to up-regulate mood. Appraisals are driven by fast and automatic Type 1 cognitive processes, which, left unchecked, can cause activated mood to escalate.

AIMS

It was hypothesized that greater propensity to override these automatic processes by engaging in reflective (Type 2) thinking would be negatively associated with extreme appraisals of activation and activation.

METHOD

Study 1 (n = 150) was a cross-sectional survey consisting of measures of activation, extreme appraisals, and an objective performance-based measure of the propensity to engage in reflective thought (cognitive reflection test; CRT). In Study 2 (n = 241) participants completed these measures plus three alternative measures of effortful cognitive engagement (CRT-2, Need for Cognition and Actively Open-Minded Thinking).

RESULTS

In Study 1, propensity to engage in reflective thought (higher CRT scores) was not significantly associated with activated mood or extreme appraisals, but activated mood and extreme appraisals were positively correlated. In study 2, the association between activation and extreme appraisals was replicated. Predicted associations between alternative measures of reflective thinking, activated mood, and extreme appraisals were not found.

CONCLUSIONS

Extreme appraisals of internal states may be a psychological mechanism underlying activated mood. Propensity to reflect on and override default cognitions was unrelated to these extreme appraisals and activated mood. Further research in a clinical sample using mood-relevant measures of reflective thinking is warranted.

摘要

相似文献

1
Do Non-Reflective Thinkers Apply Extreme Personal Meanings to their Activated Moods?
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2017 Sep;45(5):483-496. doi: 10.1017/S1352465817000248. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
2
Extreme cognitions are associated with diminished ability to use disconfirming evidence.极端认知与使用反证的能力下降有关。
Psychol Psychother. 2017 Mar;90(1):70-83. doi: 10.1111/papt.12096. Epub 2016 May 30.
3
Appraisals to affect: Testing the integrative cognitive model of bipolar disorder.对情感的评估:检验双相情感障碍的综合认知模型。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2016 Sep;55(3):225-35. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12081. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
4
Appraisals of Internal States and their Consequences: Relationship to Adolescent Analogue Bipolar Symptoms.内部状态评估及其后果:与青少年类似双相症状的关系。
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2016 Mar;44(2):214-24. doi: 10.1017/S1352465815000132. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
5
Positive and negative appraisals of the consequences of activated states uniquely relate to symptoms of hypomania and depression.积极和消极地评价激活状态的后果,与轻躁狂和抑郁症状有独特的关系。
Cogn Emot. 2012;26(5):899-906. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2011.613918. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
6
Psychological mechanisms and the ups and downs of personal recovery in bipolar disorder.双相情感障碍中的心理机制与个人康复的起伏
Br J Clin Psychol. 2017 Sep;56(3):310-328. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12140. Epub 2017 May 22.
7
Extreme positive and negative appraisals of activated states interact to discriminate bipolar disorder from unipolar depression and non-clinical controls.激活状态的极端正性和负性评价相互作用,可区分双相障碍与单相抑郁和非临床对照。
J Affect Disord. 2011 Nov;134(1-3):438-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.05.042. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
8
Response styles, bipolar risk, and mood in students: The Behaviours Checklist.学生的应对方式、双相情感障碍风险与情绪:行为清单
Psychol Psychother. 2015 Dec;88(4):412-26. doi: 10.1111/papt.12052. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
9
Bipolar vulnerability and extreme appraisals of internal states: a computerized ratings study.双相易损性与内部状态的极端评估:一项计算机评分研究。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2011 Sep-Oct;18(5):387-96. doi: 10.1002/cpp.779. Epub 2011 Sep 2.
10
Is the cognitive reflection test a measure of both reflection and intuition?认知反思测试是对反思和直觉的一种衡量手段吗?
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Mar;48(1):341-8. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0576-1.

引用本文的文献

1
"When my Moods Drive Upward There Is Nothing I Can Do about It": A Review of Extreme Appraisals of Internal States and the Bipolar Spectrum.“当我的情绪高涨时,我对此无能为力”:对内部状态的极端评估与双相谱系的综述
Front Psychol. 2017 Aug 4;8:1235. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01235. eCollection 2017.