Moreira Marcelo Rasga, Ribeiro José Mendes, Ouverney Assis Mafort
Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Fiocruz. R. Leopoldo Bulhões 1480, Manguinhos. 21041-210 Rio de Janeiro RJ Brasil.
Cien Saude Colet. 2017 Apr;22(4):1097-1108. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232017224.03742017.
This paper aims to identify and analyze the political obstacles to the implementation of Organizational Contract of Public Action (COAP) based on the perceptions of municipal health secretaries of Bipartite Interagency Commissions (CIB). For this purpose, we interviewed 195 secretaries (92% of the total) from October 2015 to August 2016. Based on the approach of policy analysis, the main hurdles identified were, in short, a traditional obstacle (lack of resources), one that has been gaining strength in recent years (judicialization of politics) and another, perhaps unheard of: the party-political system and the State Executive Branch are the great absentees in the coalitions in support of SUS regionalization policies. We can conclude that such obstacles indicate an extremely negative setting for the implementation of the COAP and other SUS regionalization policies. Thus, it is incumbent upon those involved to reflect, negotiate and build consensus on improving the health of the population and overcome such obstacles if, of course, they embrace the authors' concept that regionalization is fundamental for the SUS.
本文旨在根据双边跨部门委员会(CIB)市政卫生秘书的看法,识别并分析实施公共行动组织契约(COAP)的政治障碍。为此,我们在2015年10月至2016年8月期间采访了195名秘书(占总数的92%)。基于政策分析方法,简而言之,识别出的主要障碍包括一个传统障碍(资源匮乏)、一个近年来日益突出的障碍(政治司法化)以及另一个或许闻所未闻的障碍:政党政治体系和州行政部门在支持统一卫生系统(SUS)区域化政策的联盟中严重缺席。我们可以得出结论,这些障碍表明实施COAP和其他SUS区域化政策的环境极其不利。因此,如果相关各方认同作者关于区域化对SUS至关重要的观点,那么他们就有责任进行反思、谈判并就改善民众健康达成共识,以克服这些障碍。