Dodd S J, Tolman Deborah
Silberman School of Social Work, Hunter College, City University of New York.
Soc Work. 2017 Jul 1;62(3):227-234. doi: 10.1093/sw/swx016.
Sexuality is not an invisible dimension within social work. Social workers are constantly engaged with aspects of sexuality across virtually all practice domains. Indeed, some of the most fundamental and frequent concerns of social workers involve sexual abuse, sexual violence, and HIV and other sexually transmitted infections. However, conversations about healthy sexuality, positive sexuality, or sexual well-being that are well ensconced in many disciplines are all but absent from current social work literature, education, and practice. In this academic silence, social work is missing a significant opportunity to contribute to the larger conversation around healthy sexuality in a way that illuminates a more holistic perspective and that acknowledges desire and sexual satisfaction across the spectrum, including among marginalized and oppressed groups. In this article, authors make the case for shifting away from a pervasive focus on sexuality as solely risk based to one of balance, incorporating the normative nature and importance of sexuality, intimacy, pleasure, and desire within social work curricula, practice, and dialogue in general. They encourage social workers to recognize sexuality as a critical site of intersectionality and argue for the integration of a multidimensional approach to sexuality within social work education, practice, and research.
性取向并非社会工作中一个无形的维度。社会工作者几乎在所有实践领域都不断涉及到性取向的各个方面。事实上,社会工作者一些最基本和常见的关注点涉及性虐待、性暴力以及艾滋病毒和其他性传播感染。然而,在许多学科中已经确立的关于健康性取向、积极性取向或性福祉的讨论,在当前的社会工作文献、教育和实践中几乎不存在。在这种学术沉默中,社会工作错失了一个重要机会,无法以一种阐明更全面视角并承认包括边缘化和受压迫群体在内的全范围内的欲望和性满足的方式,为围绕健康性取向的更大讨论做出贡献。在本文中,作者主张从普遍仅将性取向视为基于风险的关注点,转向一种平衡的关注点,将性取向、亲密关系、愉悦和欲望的规范性本质及重要性纳入社会工作课程、实践及一般对话中。他们鼓励社会工作者将性取向视为一个关键的交叉性领域,并主张在社会工作教育、实践和研究中整合一种多维的性取向方法。