Khullar Vik, Anding Ralf, Robinson Dudley, Castro-Diaz David, Dmochowski Roger, Cardozo Linda
Department of Urogynaecology, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK.
Department of Neurourology, Bonn, Germany.
Neurourol Urodyn. 2017 Apr;36(4):909-914. doi: 10.1002/nau.23245.
An International Consultation on Incontinence-Research Society (ICI-RS) Think Tank in 2015 discussed and evaluated the evidence of when stress incontinence surgery should be performed with prolapse surgery and highlighted evidence gaps, with the aim of recommending further clinical and research proposals.
A review of the literature assessing randomized studies where women with vaginal prolapse have been randomized to vaginal prolapse surgery with or without continence surgery were evaluated. The different clinical presentations were also evaluated and their impact on outcome was critically reviewed.
There are three symptomatic groups of women with vaginal prolapse who are treated. The first group is continent women with vaginal prolapse. The second group has stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and vaginal prolapse. The last group has vaginal prolapse and have been found through testing to have occult SUI. The studies have reported a range of outcomes for each of these groups. There are different outcomes based on the surgical method used to correct the prolapse and also the different continence surgical techniques. There are insufficient studies to allow firm conclusions to be drawn. The economic impact of the different management pathways is also discussed although costs vary according to different national medical funding systems.
There is considerable uncertainty about the optimal method of managing women with vaginal prolapse and stress incontinence due to the different surgical techniques available. In particular the group of women with occult SUI are a challenge as the optimal diagnostic method has not yet been defined.
2015年国际尿失禁咨询委员会-研究学会(ICI-RS)智囊团讨论并评估了压力性尿失禁手术与盆腔器官脱垂手术同时进行的证据,并突出了证据空白,目的是推荐进一步的临床和研究建议。
对评估随机研究的文献进行综述,这些研究将阴道脱垂女性随机分为接受或不接受尿失禁手术的阴道脱垂手术组。还评估了不同的临床表现,并对其对结局的影响进行了严格审查。
有三组有症状的阴道脱垂女性接受治疗。第一组是有阴道脱垂的无尿失禁女性。第二组有压力性尿失禁(SUI)和阴道脱垂。最后一组有阴道脱垂,经检查发现有隐匿性SUI。这些研究报告了每组的一系列结局。根据用于纠正脱垂的手术方法以及不同的尿失禁手术技术,会有不同的结局。研究不足,无法得出确凿结论。尽管成本因不同国家的医疗资助系统而异,但也讨论了不同管理途径的经济影响。
由于可用的手术技术不同,对于阴道脱垂和压力性尿失禁女性的最佳管理方法存在很大不确定性。特别是隐匿性SUI女性群体是一个挑战,因为尚未确定最佳诊断方法。