Suppr超能文献

手指体积描记法与肱动脉示波法测量血压结果的一致性。

Agreement between finger plethysmography- and brachial oscillometry-derived blood pressure measurements.

作者信息

Allan Philip D, O'Donnell Terrence, Tzeng Yu-Chieh

机构信息

Wellington Medical Technology Group, Department of Surgery & Anaesthesia, University of Otago, Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.

Centre for Translational Physiology, University of Otago, Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.

出版信息

Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2018 May;38(3):439-446. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12435. Epub 2017 Apr 26.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Blood pressure (BP) is commonly assessed by brachial oscillometry in clinical practice, whereas in physiological studies, finger plethysmography is often employed. This study assessed the limits of agreement between BP metrics obtained from each device.

METHODS

In 96 participants, we simultaneously recorded BP by brachial oscillometry (BP+; Uscom, Sydney, NSW, Australia) and finger plethysmography (Finometer MIDI, MLE1054-V; Finapres Medical Systems B.V., Amsterdam, the Netherlands). Agreement between the two devices was assessed by correlation and Bland-Altman analysis. We assessed average BP differences between the two devices using the criteria of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instruments (AAMI), which require systolic and diastolic BP differences to be within ≤5 ± 8 (mean ± SD).

RESULTS

Bland-Altman analysis showed wide limits of agreement (±~17 mmHg or greater) between finger-derived brachial and oscillometric BP. Both systolic and mean BP exhibited positive proportional biases (both P<0·05). Systolic BP differed significantly between devices (7·4 ± 17·7 mmHg, P<0·001), which did not meet the AAMI criteria. No mean bias was observed for diastolic BP (-1·5 ± 8·6 mmHg, P = 0·097), and the SD of ±8·6 mmHg is potentially acceptable given the finger signal may be expected to capture biological variability in BP. Mean BP showed poor concordance (3·7 ± 10·5 mmHg, P<0·001).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that systolic and mean BP measurements made by brachial oscillometry do not agree with those from finger plethysmography. In contrast, diastolic BP values show acceptable agreement.

摘要

目的

在临床实践中,血压(BP)通常通过肱动脉示波法进行评估,而在生理学研究中,经常采用手指体积描记法。本研究评估了从每种设备获得的血压指标之间的一致性界限。

方法

在96名参与者中,我们同时通过肱动脉示波法(BP+;Uscom,悉尼,新南威尔士州,澳大利亚)和手指体积描记法(Finometer MIDI,MLE1054-V;Finapres Medical Systems B.V.,阿姆斯特丹,荷兰)记录血压。通过相关性分析和布兰德-奥特曼分析评估两种设备之间的一致性。我们使用美国医疗仪器促进协会(AAMI)的标准评估两种设备之间的平均血压差异,该标准要求收缩压和舒张压差异在≤5±8(均值±标准差)以内。

结果

布兰德-奥特曼分析显示,手指测量的肱动脉血压和示波法血压之间的一致性界限较宽(±~17 mmHg或更大)。收缩压和平均血压均表现出正向比例偏差(均P<0·05)。两种设备的收缩压差异显著(7·4±17·7 mmHg,P<0·001),不符合AAMI标准。舒张压未观察到平均偏差(-1·5±8·6 mmHg,P = 0·097),考虑到手指信号可能预期捕捉到血压的生物变异性,±8·6 mmHg的标准差可能是可接受的。平均血压显示一致性较差(3·7±10·5 mmHg,P<0·001)。

结论

这些发现表明,通过肱动脉示波法测量的收缩压和平均血压与手指体积描记法测量的结果不一致。相比之下,舒张压值显示出可接受的一致性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验